10 Delaware opinions name it 3 courts 1960–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Douglas Kimzey v. Yelp!green1 sentence2025Mo. Aug. 11, 2025). 69 Kimzey, 836 F.3d at 1270-71 (discussing libelous posts of users). 70 Doe v. Grindr, 709 F. Supp. 3d at 1053-54 (discussing the geolocation feature on software that was used to facilitate the multiple rapes of a young boy, the Court explained: “The harm Doe alleges does not flow solely from the product software. | 1 | 1 |
Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. Comgreen1 sentence2025Council of San Fernando Valley, 521 F.3d at 1169 (“[P]roviding neutral tools to carry out what may be unlawful or illicit searches does not amount to ‘development’ for purposes of the immunity exception.”); see generally Courtright v. Epic Games, Inc., 2025 WL 2319148 , at *4-5 (W.D. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Carrollgreen1 sentence2015That brings the Court to the question of whether the Authority’s conduct after its board received the Complaint can be viewed, on the undisputed facts, as 7 See, e.g., DiStiso v. Cook, 791 F.3d 226, 238 (2d Cir. 2012); Jones v. Carroll, 628 F. Supp. 2d 551, 561 (D. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Yannaigreen1 sentence2015That brings the Court to the question of whether the Authority’s conduct after its board received the Complaint can be viewed, on the undisputed facts, as 7 See, e.g., DiStiso v. Cook, 791 F.3d 226, 238 (2d Cir. 2012); Jones v. Carroll, 628 F. Supp. 2d 551, 561 (D. | 1 | 1 |
City of Temple Terrace v. HILLSBOROUGH ASS'N, ETC.green2 sentences1988See City of Temple Terrace v. Hillsborough Ass’n. v. Retarded Citizens, Inc., Fla. App., 322 So.2d 571 (1975), aff'd, Fla. Supr., 332 So.2d 610 (1976). 1988See City of Temple Terrace v. Hillsborough Ass’n. v. Retarded Citizens, Inc., Fla. App., 322 So.2d 571 (1975), aff'd, Fla. Supr., 332 So.2d 610 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
HILLSBOROUGH ASS'N ETC. v. City of Temple Terracegreen2 sentences1988See City of Temple Terrace v. Hillsborough Ass’n. v. Retarded Citizens, Inc., Fla. App., 322 So.2d 571 (1975), aff'd, Fla. Supr., 332 So.2d 610 (1976). 1988See City of Temple Terrace v. Hillsborough Ass’n. v. Retarded Citizens, Inc., Fla. App., 322 So.2d 571 (1975), aff'd, Fla. Supr., 332 So.2d 610 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Brawner v. Brawnergreen1 sentence1979See also Brawner v. Brawner, Mo.Supr., 327 S.W.2d 808, 815 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
Sorensen v. Sorensengreen1 sentence1976Id. at 41; accord Goller v. White, supra, 122 N.W.2d at 197; Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra, at 914. | 1 | 1 |
Goller v. Whitegreen1 sentence1976Id. at 41; accord Goller v. White, supra, 122 N.W.2d at 197; Sorensen v. Sorensen, supra, at 914. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Insurance v. Iaconi
neutral
2 sentences1960On the other hand, in American Insurance Co. v. Iaconi, 47 Del. 167 , 89 A.2d 141 , 36 A.L.R.2d 604 , we declined to apply it, and disapproved a decision of the Superior Court that had stood unchallenged for many years. 1960On the other hand, in American Insurance Co. v. Iaconi, 47 Del. 167 , 89 A.2d 141 , 36 A.L.R.2d 604 , we declined to apply it, and disapproved a decision of the Superior Court that had stood unchallenged for many years. | 2 | 1960–1960 |
American Ins. Co. v. Iaconi
green
2 sentences1960On the other hand, in American Insurance Co. v. Iaconi, 47 Del. 167 , 89 A.2d 141 , 36 A.L.R.2d 604 , we declined to apply it, and disapproved a decision of the Superior Court that had stood unchallenged for many years. 1960On the other hand, in American Insurance Co. v. Iaconi, 47 Del. 167 , 89 A.2d 141 , 36 A.L.R.2d 604 , we declined to apply it, and disapproved a decision of the Superior Court that had stood unchallenged for many years. | 2 | 1960–1960 |
Strahorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
green
2 sentences1995History in Delaware Parental Immunity Doctrine The doctrine of parental immunity was first recognized in Delaware by the Superior Court in the case of Strahorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Del.Super., 50 Del. 50 , 123 A.2d 107 (1956). 1995History in Delaware Parental Immunity Doctrine The doctrine of parental immunity was first recognized in Delaware by the Superior Court in the case of Strahorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Del.Super., 50 Del. 50 , 123 A.2d 107 (1956). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Plotkin v. Plotkin
green
1 sentence1987In Alfree the Supreme Court held en banc that one spouse may not sue the other at law, thus reaffirming the common law rule recognized by the Superior Court in Plotkin v. Plotkin, Del.Super., 125 A. 455 (1924) and by other courts of this State since 1924. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Flait v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington
green
2 sentences1979Traditionally, the history of sovereign immunity in Delaware followed a trend of erosion that culminated in City of Wilmington v. Spencer, supra, and Thomas v. Mayor and Council of the City of Wilmington, supra. In Flait v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington, Del.Supr., 48 Del. 89 , 97 A.2d 545 (1953), although criticizing the doctrine of immunity, the Supreme Court accepted it on the basis of stare decisis. 1979Traditionally, the history of sovereign immunity in Delaware followed a trend of erosion that culminated in City of Wilmington v. Spencer, supra, and Thomas v. Mayor and Council of the City of Wilmington, supra. In Flait v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington, Del.Supr., 48 Del. 89 , 97 A.2d 545 (1953), although criticizing the doctrine of immunity, the Supreme Court accepted it on the basis of stare decisis. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
City of Wilmington v. Spencer
red
1 sentence1979Traditionally, the history of sovereign immunity in Delaware followed a trend of erosion that culminated in City of Wilmington v. Spencer, supra, and Thomas v. Mayor and Council of the City of Wilmington, supra. In Flait v. Mayor & Council of Wilmington, Del.Supr., 48 Del. 89 , 97 A.2d 545 (1953), although criticizing the doctrine of immunity, the Supreme Court accepted it on the basis of stare decisis. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.