14 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Westbrook v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Westbrook v. State, 658 So.2d 847, 849 (Miss.1995) (citing Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542 (Miss.1990)). 2001Westbrook v. State, 658 So.2d 847, 849 (Miss.1995) ( citing Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542 (Miss.1990)). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martinson v. City of Jackson
green
2 sentences2009Martinson v. City of Jackson, 215 So.2d 414 (Miss.1968). ¶ 42. 2009Martinson v. City of Jackson, 215 So.2d 414 (Miss.1968). ¶ 42. | 6 | 1969–2009 |
Wakefield v. Kraft
green
2 sentences1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. 1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. | 4 | 1968–1982 |
Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals
green
2 sentences1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. 1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. | 4 | 1968–1982 |
American Oil Co. v. Miller
green
2 sentences1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. 1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. | 4 | 1968–1982 |
Griffin v. State
green
2 sentences2001Westbrook v. State, 658 So.2d 847, 849 (Miss.1995) (citing Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542 (Miss.1990)). 2001Westbrook v. State, 658 So.2d 847, 849 (Miss.1995) ( citing Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542 (Miss.1990)). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Williams
green
2 sentences1971Co. v. Williams, 87 Miss. 344 , 39 So. 489 (1905): * * * It is the firmly established doctrine in this state that punitory or exemplary damages are always properly allowed where the trespass complained of or the breach of duty committed was malicious, wanton, willful, or capricious. [Cumberland] Telephone [& Telegraph] Co. v. Cassedy, 78 Miss. 670 , 29 South. 762 . 1971Co. v. Williams, 87 Miss. 344 , 39 So. 489 (1905): * * * It is the firmly established doctrine in this state that punitory or exemplary damages are always properly allowed where the trespass complained of or the breach of duty committed was malicious, wanton, willful, or capricious. [Cumberland] Telephone [& Telegraph] Co. v. Cassedy, 78 Miss. 670 , 29 South. 762 . | 2 | 1957–1971 |
Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.
green
2 sentences1999Kennington Co., 155 Miss. 242 , 124 So. 344 (1929), the Mississippi Supreme Court stated, [I]n the absence of any statutory requirement that the authority of an attorney shall be evidenced by writing, his position as an officer of the court makes it unnecessary for him, in the ordinary case, to show his authority in any way, there being a firmly established presumption in favor of an attorney's authority to act for any client whom he professes to represent. 1999Kennington Co., 155 Miss. 242 , 124 So. 344 (1929), the Mississippi Supreme Court stated, [I]n the absence of any statutory requirement that the authority of an attorney shall be evidenced by writing, his position as an officer of the court makes it unnecessary for him, in the ordinary case, to show his authority in any way, there being a firmly established presumption in favor of an attorney's authority to act for any client whom he professes to represent. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Sullivan v. City of Bay St. Louis
green
1 sentence1982Wakefield v. Kraft, 202 Md. 136 , 96 A.2d 27 ; American Oil Co. v. Miller, 204 Md. 32 , 102 A.2d 727 ; Temmink v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore County, 205 Md. 489 , 109 A.2d 85 ." 215 So.2d at 417 . [ 375 So.2d at 1201 ]. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Strong
green
1 sentence1961Some of the evidence introduced did not comply with the firmly established rule for determining damages in eminent domain cases, namely: “The fair market value of the whole property before the taking, less the fair market value of the whole property immediately after the taking.” See cases cited in Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Strong, 129 So. 2d 349 (Miss. 1961). | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Mangum v. Finucane
neutral
1 sentence1880See Farmers’ Bank v. Douglas, 11 Smed. & M. 469 ; Ingraham v. Gregg, 13 Smed. & M. 22; Hunt v. Knox, 34 Miss. 656 ; Mangum v. Finucane, 38 Miss. 354 ; Wright v. Henderson, 7 How. 539 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.