Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mercergreen2 sentences2018If anything, the prosecutor lost credibility with the jury by making the argument. “[W]e are faced with the firmly established rule that misconduct of the prosecutor does not require a new trial unless it appears to have been so prejudicial as to deprive defendant of a fair trial.” State v. Mercer, 154 N.W.2d 140, 142 (Iowa 1967). 2016See State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734 , 756–57 (Iowa 2006) (finding defendant was not prejudiced where the jury was instructed “to decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence from the evidence and the law in these instructions, and that evidence did not include statements, arguments, and comments by the lawyers”); State v. Reeves, No. 13–0908, 2014 WL 2884864 , at *4–5 (Iowa Ct. App. June 25, 2014) (holding the defendant failed to establish prejudice where the evidence was strong and the jury was properly instructed to consider only the evidence). “[W]e are faced with the firmly established rule t | 3 | 3 |
Jordan v. Reagreen2 sentences2024As the Arizona Court of Appeals explained in Jordan v. Rea, a court’s resolution of a dispute regarding the care of a child is “consistent with ‘the firmly established principle that at all levels, at all times and in all forums, the welfare and best interest of the child is of prime and overriding importance.’ ” 212 P.3d 919, 928 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) (quoting Funk v. Ossman, 724 P.2d 1247, 1250 (Az. 2024As the Arizona Court of Appeals explained in Jordan v. Rea, a court’s resolution of a dispute regarding the care of a child is “consistent with ‘the firmly established principle that at all levels, at all times and in all forums, the welfare and best interest of the child is of prime and overriding importance.’ ” 212 P.3d 919, 928 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) (quoting Funk v. Ossman, 724 P.2d 1247, 1250 (Az. | 2 | 2 |
Funk v. Ossmangreen2 sentences2024As the Arizona Court of Appeals explained in Jordan v. Rea, a court’s resolution of a dispute regarding the care of a child is “consistent with ‘the firmly established principle that at all levels, at all times and in all forums, the welfare and best interest of the child is of prime and overriding importance.’ ” 212 P.3d 919, 928 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) (quoting Funk v. Ossman, 724 P.2d 1247, 1250 (Az. 2024As the Arizona Court of Appeals explained in Jordan v. Rea, a court’s resolution of a dispute regarding the care of a child is “consistent with ‘the firmly established principle that at all levels, at all times and in all forums, the welfare and best interest of the child is of prime and overriding importance.’ ” 212 P.3d 919, 928 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) (quoting Funk v. Ossman, 724 P.2d 1247, 1250 (Az. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Mussergreen1 sentence2016See State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734 , 756–57 (Iowa 2006) (finding defendant was not prejudiced where the jury was instructed “to decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence from the evidence and the law in these instructions, and that evidence did not include statements, arguments, and comments by the lawyers”); State v. Reeves, No. 13–0908, 2014 WL 2884864 , at *4–5 (Iowa Ct. App. June 25, 2014) (holding the defendant failed to establish prejudice where the evidence was strong and the jury was properly instructed to consider only the evidence). “[W]e are faced with the firmly established rule t | 1 | 1 |
Malone v. Meekinsgreen2 sentences1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). 1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Abood v. Gorsuchgreen2 sentences1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). 1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage of Beehgreen1 sentence1978See In re Marriage of Beeh, 214 N.W.2d 170, 173 (Iowa 1974). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Slausongreen2 sentences1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . 1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dunngreen2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kressgreen2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1 |
State v. Webbgreen2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bisantigreen2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tyler v. Budd
green
2 sentences1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat 1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat | 3 | 1925–1935 |
Seekel v. Winch
neutral
2 sentences1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat 1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat | 3 | 1925–1935 |
Woods v. Allen
green
2 sentences1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat 1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat | 3 | 1925–1935 |
Carr v. Way
green
2 sentences1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat 1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat | 3 | 1925–1935 |
Kolb v. Mall
neutral
2 sentences1935Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 , 64 N. W. 679 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 , 78 N. W. 821 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 , 119 N. W. 700 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 , 80 N. W. 540 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 , 174 N. W. 226 .” In Buell v. Waite, supra, we said: “A voluntary conveyance is constructively fraudulent as to existing creditors, unless the grantor had sufficient remaining property to satisfy his creditors; and the burden is on the grantee to establish that his remaining property was sufficient for that purpose.” It is the settled rule of law in this state that transactions of this nat 1929Tyler v. Budd, 96 Iowa 29 ; Seekel v. Winch, 108 Iowa 102 ; Carr v. Way, 141 Iowa 245 ; Woods v. Allen, 109 Iowa 484 ; Kolb v. Mall, 187 Iowa 193 . | 3 | 1925–1935 |
Abood v. League of Women Voters of Alaska
green
2 sentences1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). 1996League of Women Voters, 743 P.2d at 336 ; Abood v. Gorsuch, 703 P.2d 1158, 1160 (Alaska 1985); Malone v. Meekins, 650 P.2d 351, 356 (Alaska 1982). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Hess
green
2 sentences1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . 1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
State v. Barton
green
2 sentences1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . 1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
State v. Olson
green
2 sentences1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . 1967Some of the precedents supporting the rule are State v. Olson, 249 Iowa 536, 554 , 86 N.W.2d 214, 225 , and citations; State v. Slauson, 249 Iowa 755, 759 , 88 N.W.2d 806, 808, 809 ; State v. Hess, 256 Iowa 794, 800 , 129 N.W.2d 81, 84 , and citations; State v. Barton, 258 Iowa 924, 931 , 140 N.W.2d 886, 891 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
State v. Plude
green
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Strable
neutral
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Boston
green
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Hofer
green
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Heinz
green
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Icenbice
green
2 sentences1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s 1949State v. Icenbice, 1904, 126 Iowa 16, 20 , 101 N.W. 273 ; State v. Dunn, 1927, 202 Iowa 1188, 1192 , 211 N.W. 850, 852 (“It is the well-settled rule in this state with respect to a confession of guilt that, where it appears to have been free and voluntary, the burden is upon the defendant to show coercion or inducement such as to require its exclusion. * * * The prevailing rule is that confessions are prima- facie voluntary.”); State v. Kress, supra, 204 Iowa 828, 832 , 216 N.W. 31, 32 (“The presumption exists that a confession is voluntary.” There was nothing in the Kress *149 confession to s | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Curtis v. Town of Dunlap
green
1 sentence1928In Curtis v. Town of Dunlap, supra, we said: “The immediate increase in reasonable market value resulting from the improvement is not, however, determinative of the special benefits received. ’ ’ In In re Appeal of Hume, 202 Iowa 969 , we said: “It is not necessary that the special benefits conferred be reflected in an immediate enhancement of market value.” In Diesing v. City of Marshalltown, 199 Iowa 1270 , we said: “It is also a firmly established doctrine that it is not alone present or immediate benefits or enhancement of the value of property that are to be taken into consideration in ar | 1 | 1928–1928 |
In Re Appeal of Hume
neutral
1 sentence1928In Curtis v. Town of Dunlap, supra, we said: “The immediate increase in reasonable market value resulting from the improvement is not, however, determinative of the special benefits received. ’ ’ In In re Appeal of Hume, 202 Iowa 969 , we said: “It is not necessary that the special benefits conferred be reflected in an immediate enhancement of market value.” In Diesing v. City of Marshalltown, 199 Iowa 1270 , we said: “It is also a firmly established doctrine that it is not alone present or immediate benefits or enhancement of the value of property that are to be taken into consideration in ar | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Diesing v. City of Marshalltown
green
1 sentence1928In Curtis v. Town of Dunlap, supra, we said: “The immediate increase in reasonable market value resulting from the improvement is not, however, determinative of the special benefits received. ’ ’ In In re Appeal of Hume, 202 Iowa 969 , we said: “It is not necessary that the special benefits conferred be reflected in an immediate enhancement of market value.” In Diesing v. City of Marshalltown, 199 Iowa 1270 , we said: “It is also a firmly established doctrine that it is not alone present or immediate benefits or enhancement of the value of property that are to be taken into consideration in ar | 1 | 1928–1928 |
| Bell v. City of Burlington green | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| In re Special Assessment Jefferson Street Sewer green | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| In re Appeal of J. K. & W. H. Gilcrest Co. neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
| In re Paving Floyd Park Addition neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.