Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1916–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Com'ngreen1 sentence2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const | 1 | 1 |
Hermann v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const | 1 | 1 |
Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Commissiongreen2 sentences2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const 2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const | 1 | 1 |
William Lyon Co. v. Franchise Tax Boardgreen2 sentences2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const 2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const | 1 | 1 |
Bennett v. State Department of Assessments & Taxationgreen2 sentences2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const 2002If there is ambiguity in a tax statute specifically regarding deductions, however, “the law is to be construed strongly against the taxpayer.” Potlatch Corp. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 128 Idaho 387, 389 , 913 P.2d 1157, 1159 (1996); see also Manufab, Inc. v. Mississippi State Tax Comm’n, 808 So.2d 947, 949 (Miss.2002) (tax credits and exemptions construed strictly against taxpayer); Bennett v. State Dep’t of Assessments and Taxation, 143 Md.App. 356 , 795 A.2d 124, 132 (Md.2001) (“It is a firmly established principle of law that exemptions from taxation are not favored, but are strictly const | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of Gooding
neutral
2 sentences1983State v. City of Gooding, 75 Idaho 36 , 266 P.2d 655 (1953). 1983State v. City of Gooding, 75 Idaho 36 , 266 P.2d 655 (1953). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . 1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co.
green
2 sentences1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . 1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Sakrison v. Pierce
green
2 sentences1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . 1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Gaskin v. Wayland
green
2 sentences1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . 1960Sakrison v. Pierce, 66 Ariz. 162 , 185 P.2d 528 , 173 A.L.R. 480 ; Sisk v. Arizona Ice & Cold Storage Co., 60 Ariz. 496 , 141 P.2d 395 ; Creameries of America v. Industrial Comm., 98 Utah 571 , 102 P.2d 300 ; Gaskin v. Wayland, 61 Ariz. 291 , 148 P.2d 590 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Daniels v. Tearney
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. Osborn
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Brady v. Place
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Allmon
neutral
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
In Re Contempt Proceedings of Brainard
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Powell v. McKelvey
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Taylor v. Girard
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
On Motion to Retax Costs
neutral
2 sentences1953State v. Heitz, 72 Idaho 107 , 238 P.2d 439 ; Albrethsen v. State, 60 Idaho 715 , 96 P.2d 437 , or where, pursuant to the authority conferred by such statute, one has voluntarily claimed and aocepted its benefits, Henderson v. Twin Falls County, 59 Idaho 97 , 80 P.2d 801 ; Taylor v. Girard, 54 Idaho 787 , 36 P.2d 773 ; Brady v. Place, 41 Idaho 747 , 242 P. 314 , 243 P. 654 ; Sacramento County v. City of Sacramento, 75 Cal.App.2d 436 , 171 P.2d 477 ; Foster v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.App.2d 230 , 79 P.2d 144 ; McMahon v. Cooney, 95 Mont. 138 , 25 P.2d 131 ; Buck v. Kuykendall, 267 U.S. 307 , 45 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Albrethsen v. State
neutral
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Williams v. Baldridge
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
McMahon v. Cooney
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Buck v. Kuykendall
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Henderson v. Twin Falis County
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union Local No. 328
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Foster v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Heitz
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
County of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento
green
2 sentences1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 1953It is a firmly established principle of law, of uniform application, that the constitutionality of a statute may not be questioned by one whose rights have not been or are not about to be injuriously affected by the operation of such statute, Poffenroth v. Culinary Workers Union, 71 Idaho 412 , 232 P.2d 968 ; Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Huff, 58 Idaho 587 , 76 P.2d 923 ; Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 ; In re Brainard, 55 Idaho 153 , 39 P.2d 769 ; In re Allmon, 50 Idaho 223 , 294 P. 528 ; Williams v. Baldridge, 48 Idaho 618 , 284 P. 203 ; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 76, p. 157 | 1 | 1953–1953 |
CAL. STATE AUTO. ASSN. ETC. v. Downey
green
2 sentences1951Under this rule, appellant would appear to have no standing to make the present contention, for its rights are in no way adversely affected nor discriminatorily prejudiced by section 3 of the Fire Liability Law. * * *” Ventura County v. Southern California Edison Co., supra. Griffiths v. State, 28 Wash.2d 493 , 183 P.2d 821 , at page 825; Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co, Cal.App., 204 P.2d 661 , at page 679; California State Automobile Ass’n v. Downey, 96 Cal.App.2d 876 , 216 P.2d 882 , at page 901. 1951Under this rule, appellant would appear to have no standing to make the present contention, for its rights are in no way adversely affected nor discriminatorily prejudiced by section 3 of the Fire Liability Law. * * *” Ventura County v. Southern California Edison Co., supra. Griffiths v. State, 28 Wash.2d 493 , 183 P.2d 821 , at page 825; Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co, Cal.App., 204 P.2d 661 , at page 679; California State Automobile Ass’n v. Downey, 96 Cal.App.2d 876 , 216 P.2d 882 , at page 901. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Griffiths v. State
green
2 sentences1951Under this rule, appellant would appear to have no standing to make the present contention, for its rights are in no way adversely affected nor discriminatorily prejudiced by section 3 of the Fire Liability Law. * * *” Ventura County v. Southern California Edison Co., supra. Griffiths v. State, 28 Wash.2d 493 , 183 P.2d 821 , at page 825; Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co, Cal.App., 204 P.2d 661 , at page 679; California State Automobile Ass’n v. Downey, 96 Cal.App.2d 876 , 216 P.2d 882 , at page 901. 1951Under this rule, appellant would appear to have no standing to make the present contention, for its rights are in no way adversely affected nor discriminatorily prejudiced by section 3 of the Fire Liability Law. * * *” Ventura County v. Southern California Edison Co., supra. Griffiths v. State, 28 Wash.2d 493 , 183 P.2d 821 , at page 825; Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co, Cal.App., 204 P.2d 661 , at page 679; California State Automobile Ass’n v. Downey, 96 Cal.App.2d 876 , 216 P.2d 882 , at page 901. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
| Sammis v. Wightman ex rel. Marcher neutral | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.