Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
26 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1927–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Massie v. Perssongreen2 sentences2012This tribunal assumed the Supreme Court meant what it said for we wrote through Judge Dunn in Massie v. Persson, Ky.App., 729 S.W.2d 448, 452 (1987): CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) in providing that an appellate briefs contents must contain at the beginning of each argument a reference to the record showing whether the issue was preserved for review and in what manner emphasizes the importance of the firmly established rule that the trial court should first be given the opportunity to rule on questions before they are available for appellate review. 2012This tribunal assumed the Supreme Court meant what it said for we wrote through Judge Dunn in Massie v. Persson, Ky.App., 729 S.W.2d 448, 452 (1987): CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) in providing that an appellate briefs contents must contain at the beginning of each argument a reference to the record showing whether the issue was preserved for review and in what manner empha sizes the importance of the firmly established rule that the trial court should first be given the opportunity to rule on questions before they are available for appellate review. | 5 | 5 |
Elwell v. Stonegreen2 sentences2021It is only to avert a manifest injustice that this court will entertain an argument not presented to the trial court. (citations omitted). -5- Elwell v. Stone, 799 S.W.2d 46, 48 (Ky. App. 1990) (quoting Massie v. Persson, 729 S.W.2d 448, 452 (Ky. App. 1987)). 2020It is only to avert a manifest injustice that this court will entertain an argument not presented to the trial court. (citations omitted). 799 S.W.2d 46, 48 (Ky. App. 1990). 5 CR 76.12(4)(d)(iii), by reference to CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv), requires appellees to provide “ample references to the specific pages of the record . . . supporting each of the statements narrated in the” counterstatement of the case. | 3 | 3 |
Conner v. George W. Whitesides Co.green2 sentences2021Whitesides Co., 834 S.W.2d 652 (Ky. 1992), saying, CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) in providing that an appellate brief's contents must contain at the beginning of each argument a reference to the record showing whether the issue was preserved for review and in what manner emphasizes the importance of the firmly established rule that the trial court should first be given the opportunity to rule on questions before they are available for appellate review. 2020Whitesides Co., 834 S.W.2d 652, 654 (Ky. 1992))]: CR 76.12(4)(c)(iv) in providing that an appellate brief’s contents must contain at the beginning of each argument a reference to the record showing whether the issue was preserved for review and in what manner emphasizes the importance of the firmly established rule that the trial court should first be given the opportunity to rule on questions before they are available for appellate review. | 1 | 3 |
Dowling's Adm'x v. Walkergreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Combs v. Combs, 304 Ky. 271 , 200 S.W.2d 481, 483 (1947) (“It is a firmly established rule that a fee allowed for an attorney’s services on appeal does not constitute an element of damage in an action on the supersedeas bond.”); Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S.W. 281, 282 (1905) (“The covenant of a supersedeas bond does not cover an attorney’s fee, as a part of the costs.”). 2023See, e.g., Combs v. Combs, 304 Ky. 271 , 200 S.W.2d 481, 483 (1947) (“It is a firmly established rule that a fee allowed for an attorney’s services on appeal does not constitute an element of damage in an action on the supersedeas bond.”); Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S.W. 281, 282 (1905) (“The covenant of a supersedeas bond does not cover an attorney’s fee, as a part of the costs.”). | 1 | 2 |
Combs v. Combsgreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Combs v. Combs, 304 Ky. 271 , 200 S.W.2d 481, 483 (1947) (“It is a firmly established rule that a fee allowed for an attorney’s services on appeal does not constitute an element of damage in an action on the supersedeas bond.”); Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S.W. 281, 282 (1905) (“The covenant of a supersedeas bond does not cover an attorney’s fee, as a part of the costs.”). 2023See, e.g., Combs v. Combs, 304 Ky. 271 , 200 S.W.2d 481, 483 (1947) (“It is a firmly established rule that a fee allowed for an attorney’s services on appeal does not constitute an element of damage in an action on the supersedeas bond.”); Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S.W. 281, 282 (1905) (“The covenant of a supersedeas bond does not cover an attorney’s fee, as a part of the costs.”). | 1 | 1 |
Regional Jail Authority v. Tackettgreen1 sentence2021The law is well-settled that “[t]he Court of Appeals is without authority to review issues not raised in or decided by the trial court.” Reg’l Jail Auth. v. Tackett, 770 S.W.2d 225, 228 (Ky. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Harper v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1974See Harper v. Wilson, 223 Ky. 390 , 3 S.W.2d 769 , and numerous other cases cited in 6 Kentucky Digest, Covenants, p. 332; and in 18A Kentucky Digest, Vendor & Purchaser, pp. 380 to 384, and pp. 556 and 557. 1 The rule applies even though the vendor may have represented his title as perfect when in fact it is not; constructive fraud is not sufficient. 1974See Harper v. Wilson, 223 Ky. 390 , 3 S.W.2d 769 , and numerous other cases cited in 6 Kentucky Digest, Covenants, p. 332; and in 18A Kentucky Digest, Vendor & Purchaser, pp. 380 to 384, and pp. 556 and 557. 1 The rule applies even though the vendor may have represented his title as perfect when in fact it is not; constructive fraud is not sufficient. | 1 | 1 |
Codell Construction Co. v. Nealgreen2 sentences1947See Codell Construction Co. v. Neal, 258 Ky. 603 , 80 S. W. 2d 530 . 1947See Codell Construction Co. v. Neal, 258 Ky. 603 , 80 S. W. 2d 530 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. Eline
green
1 sentence1986In that case, it was stated: It is a firmly established doctrine in this and a great majority of other states that a purchaser of lands encumbered with a mortgage or other lien who assumes and agrees to pay or satisfy the lien indebtedness on the property purchased becomes personally and primarily liable therefor and liability under the assumption agreement inures to the mortgagee or lien holder who by appropriate action in his own name may enforce same. [Authorities omitted.] Id. at 639 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hale v. Hale
green
2 sentences1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . 1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Stonefield v. Buchanan
neutral
2 sentences1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . 1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Sharp v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . 1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Littreal v. Littreal
neutral
1 sentence1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Vickery v. Lady
green
1 sentence1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Hampton v. Whaley
neutral
2 sentences1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . 1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Brown v. Hoblitzell
green
1 sentence1962Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611 , 233 S.W.2d 273 ; Brown v. Hoblitzell, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 739 ; Stonefield v. Buchanan, 289 Ky. 386 , 158 S.W.2d 970 ; Vickery v. Lady, Ky., 264 S.W.2d 683 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Johnson's Committee v. Mitchell
neutral
2 sentences1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . 1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Fugate v. Walker
neutral
2 sentences1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . 1962Johnson’s Committee v. Mitchell, 146 Ky. 382 , 142 S.W. 675 ; Fugate v. Walker, 204 Ky. 767 , 265 S.W. 331 ; Hale v. Hale, 245 Ky. 358 , 53 S.W.2d 554 ; Sharp v. Commonwealth, 308 Ky. 765 , 215 S.W.2d 983 ; Littreal v. Littreal, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 247 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Barr
green
2 sentences1956Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Barr and Same v. Bryant, 307 Ky. 28 , 209 S.W.2d 719 ; 5 Am.Jur., Automobiles, Sec. 483, p. 774. 1956Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Barr and Same v. Bryant, 307 Ky. 28 , 209 S.W.2d 719 ; 5 Am.Jur., Automobiles, Sec. 483, p. 774. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Wilhoit v. Liles
neutral
2 sentences1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . 1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Ashcraft v. Edmondson
neutral
1 sentence1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Edwards v. Logan
green
2 sentences1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . 1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Rich v. Young
neutral
2 sentences1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . 1951It is the firmly established rule that before ballots may be recounted the candi-dáte requesting the recount must show by satisfactory evidence that the integrity of the ballots has been “rigorously preserved.” See Edwards v. Logan, 114 Ky. 312 , 70 S.W. 852 , 75 S.W. 257 ; Rich v. Young, 176 Ky. 813 , 197 S.W. 442 ; Wilhoit v. Liles et al., 300 Ky. 564 , 189 S.W.2d 851 ; and Ashcraft v. Edmonson et al., Ky. 242 S.W.2d 635 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Cook v. Hagan
neutral
2 sentences1948Cook et al. v. Hagan et al., 301 Ky. 346 , 192 S. W. 2d 97 . 1948Cook et al. v. Hagan et al., 301 Ky. 346 , 192 S. W. 2d 97 . | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Winston's Administrator v. City of Henderson
green
2 sentences1948Winston’s Adm’r v. City of Henderson, 179 Ky. 220 , 200 S. W. 330 , L. 1948Winston’s Adm’r v. City of Henderson, 179 Ky. 220 , 200 S. W. 330 , L. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Phil Hollenbach Co. v. Hollenbach
green
2 sentences1948Consequently, no break in the employment is caused by the mere fact that the Workman is ministering to his personal comfort or necessities, as by warming himself or seeking shelter, or by leaving his work to relieve nature, or to procure a drink, refreshments, food, or fresh air, or to rest in the shade.’ ” The first appeal to come before this court from an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board was in Phil Hollenbach Co. v. Hollenbach, 181 Ky. 262 , 204 S. W. 152 , 13 A. L. 1948Consequently, no break in the employment is caused by the mere fact that the Workman is ministering to his personal comfort or necessities, as by warming himself or seeking shelter, or by leaving his work to relieve nature, or to procure a drink, refreshments, food, or fresh air, or to rest in the shade.’ ” The first appeal to come before this court from an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board was in Phil Hollenbach Co. v. Hollenbach, 181 Ky. 262 , 204 S. W. 152 , 13 A. L. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Craddock v. Kaiser
neutral
2 sentences1947Craddock v. Kaiser et al., 280 Ky. 577 , 133 S. W. 2d 916 ; Jones v. Tarry, 187 Ky. 700 , 220 S. W. 523 . 1947Craddock v. Kaiser et al., 280 Ky. 577 , 133 S. W. 2d 916 ; Jones v. Tarry, 187 Ky. 700 , 220 S. W. 523 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Welch v. Welch
neutral
2 sentences1947Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S. W. 281 ; Welch v. Welch, 106 Ky. 406 , 50 S. W. 687 . 1947Dowling’s Adm’x v. Walker, 120 Ky. 528 , 87 S. W. 281 ; Welch v. Welch, 106 Ky. 406 , 50 S. W. 687 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Jones v. Tarry
neutral
2 sentences1947Craddock v. Kaiser et al., 280 Ky. 577 , 133 S. W. 2d 916 ; Jones v. Tarry, 187 Ky. 700 , 220 S. W. 523 . 1947Craddock v. Kaiser et al., 280 Ky. 577 , 133 S. W. 2d 916 ; Jones v. Tarry, 187 Ky. 700 , 220 S. W. 523 . | 1 | 1947–1947 |
| Mayhew v. McGlothlin green | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hutchins v. Foley
neutral
2 sentences1939Mullins v. Patrick, 229 Ky. 195 , 16 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; Mayhew v. McGlothin, 269 Ky. 184 , 106 S. W. (2d) 643 ; Hutchins v. Foley, 271 Ky. 104 , 111 S. W. (2d) 586 ; Keeton v. Owens, 228 Ky. 522 , 15 S. W. (2d) 487 . 1939Mullins v. Patrick, 229 Ky. 195 , 16 S. W. (2d) 1018 ; Mayhew v. McGlothin, 269 Ky. 184 , 106 S. W. (2d) 643 ; Hutchins v. Foley, 271 Ky. 104 , 111 S. W. (2d) 586 ; Keeton v. Owens, 228 Ky. 522 , 15 S. W. (2d) 487 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
| Mullins v. Patrick neutral | 1 | 1939–1939 |
| Keeton v. Owens neutral | 1 | 1939–1939 |
| White v. Upton neutral | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Venable's v. Thompson neutral | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Kentucky Joint Stock Land Bank v. Farmers Exchange Bank green | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Ezell green | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Stonestreet v. Jacobs green | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Gray v. Gilliam neutral | 1 | 1938–1938 |
| Branham v. Commonwealth neutral | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Wendling v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.