13 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1877–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bussmanngreen2 sentences2014See generally 741 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. 2007).6 A majority of the court found an Establishment Clause violation as applied to the facts of the defendant’s trial because “[t]he state relied heavily on religious expert testimony to prove its case and the court allowed the jury to hear discussion that intertwined religious doctrine with state law.” Id. at 92 . 2014See generally 741 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. 2007).6 A majority of the court found an Establishment Clause violation as applied to the facts of the defendant’s trial because “[t]he state relied heavily on religious expert testimony to prove its case and the court allowed the jury to hear discussion that intertwined religious doctrine with state law.” Id. at 92 . | 2 | 2 |
Reiss v. ICI Seeds, Inc.green1 sentence2018See id. | 1 | 1 |
Tjeerdsma v. Global Steel Buildings, Inc.green1 sentence1999“The essential test for waiver of arbitration requires conduct or activity inconsistent with the right to arbitration and prejudice to the party claiming waiver.” Clinton Nat’l Bank, 559 N.W.2d at 284 (quoting Tjeerdsma v. Global Steel Bldgs., Inc., 466 N.W.2d 643, 645 (S.D.1991)) (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1 |
Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of Californiagreen1 sentence1990Id., — U.S. at -, 110 S.Ct. at 699, 107 L.Ed.2d at 813 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Lemon v. Kurtzmanred2 sentences1990Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 613 , 91 S.Ct. 2105, 2111 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745, 756 (1971). 1990Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 613 , 91 S.Ct. 2105, 2111 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745, 756 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Merryman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.green1 sentence1911See Merryman v. Railroad Co., 85 Iowa, 634 ; Masser v. Railroad Co., 68 Iowa, 602 ; Carson v. Railroad Co., 96 Iowa, 583 ; Brown v. Canning Co., 132 Iowa, 634 ; Keefe v. Electric Co., 21 R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clinton National Bank v. Kirk Gross Co.
green
1 sentence1999“The essential test for waiver of arbitration requires conduct or activity inconsistent with the right to arbitration and prejudice to the party claiming waiver.” Clinton Nat’l Bank, 559 N.W.2d at 284 (quoting Tjeerdsma v. Global Steel Bldgs., Inc., 466 N.W.2d 643, 645 (S.D.1991)) (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Kartridg Pak Co. v. Department of Revenue
green
1 sentence1990Id., — U.S. at -, 110 S.Ct. at 699, 107 L.Ed.2d at 813 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Md. & Va. Churches v. Sharpsburg Ch.
green
2 sentences1976Maryland & Virginia Eldership of Churches of God, Inc. v. Church of God, Inc., 396 U.S. 367 , 90 S.Ct. 499 , 24 L.Ed.2d 582 (1970); Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church, supra, (2) the exemption of property used for religious purposes from taxation. 1976Maryland & Virginia Eldership of Churches of God, Inc. v. Church of God, Inc., 396 U.S. 367 , 90 S.Ct. 499 , 24 L.Ed.2d 582 (1970); Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church, supra, (2) the exemption of property used for religious purposes from taxation. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist
green
1 sentence1976Primary among those evils have been ‘sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activities.’ (Authorities).” Drawing from what it described as “the full sweep of the establishment clause cases” the United States Supreme Court in Nyquist, supra, laid down a three part test for determining whether laws which aid religious institutions violate the clause: “ * * * [T]o pass muster under the Establishment Clause the law in question first must reflect a clearly secular legislative purpose, (Authority), second, must have a primary effect that neither advances | 1 | 1976–1976 |
O'Connell v. Chicago Park District
green
2 sentences1944In case such peremptory injunction has issued against the bringing of actions against the receiver or against the owner of the property of which he is receiver, the holder of a claim liable to be tolled by the statute of limitations may seek relief by petitioning the court which appointed the receiver and issued the injunction for leave to bring an action at law or suit in equity, and to modify the injunction accordingly, or for leave to file an intervening petition for the establishment of his claim. ’ ’ In O’Connell v. Chicago Park District, 376 Ill. 550, 557 , 34 N. E. 2d 836, 840 , 135 A. 1944In case such peremptory injunction has issued against the bringing of actions against the receiver or against the owner of the property of which he is receiver, the holder of a claim liable to be tolled by the statute of limitations may seek relief by petitioning the court which appointed the receiver and issued the injunction for leave to bring an action at law or suit in equity, and to modify the injunction accordingly, or for leave to file an intervening petition for the establishment of his claim. ’ ’ In O’Connell v. Chicago Park District, 376 Ill. 550, 557 , 34 N. E. 2d 836, 840 , 135 A. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Brady v. Mattern
green
2 sentences1939Brady v. Mattern, 125 Iowa 158 , 100 N. W. 358 , 106 Am. 1939Brady v. Mattern, 125 Iowa 158 , 100 N. W. 358 , 106 Am. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Peterson v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1937Lamm v. Sooy, 79 Iowa 593 , 44 N. W. 893 ; Peterson v. Johnson, 205 Iowa 16 , 212 N. W. 138 . 1937Lamm v. Sooy, 79 Iowa 593 , 44 N. W. 893 ; Peterson v. Johnson, 205 Iowa 16 , 212 N. W. 138 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Lamm v. Sooy
neutral
2 sentences1937Lamm v. Sooy, 79 Iowa 593 , 44 N. W. 893 ; Peterson v. Johnson, 205 Iowa 16 , 212 N. W. 138 . 1937Lamm v. Sooy, 79 Iowa 593 , 44 N. W. 893 ; Peterson v. Johnson, 205 Iowa 16 , 212 N. W. 138 . | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Swartzendruber v. Polke
green
2 sentences1934Myers v. Wendel, 198 Iowa 859 , 200 N. W. 431 ; Swartzendruber v. Polke, 205 Iowa 382 , 218 N. W. 62, 65 . 1934Myers v. Wendel, 198 Iowa 859 , 200 N. W. 431 ; Swartzendruber v. Polke, 205 Iowa 382 , 218 N. W. 62, 65 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Myers v. Wendel
neutral
1 sentence1934Myers v. Wendel, 198 Iowa 859 , 200 N. W. 431 ; Swartzendruber v. Polke, 205 Iowa 382 , 218 N. W. 62, 65 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Masser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.
green
1 sentence1911See Merryman v. Railroad Co., 85 Iowa, 634 ; Masser v. Railroad Co., 68 Iowa, 602 ; Carson v. Railroad Co., 96 Iowa, 583 ; Brown v. Canning Co., 132 Iowa, 634 ; Keefe v. Electric Co., 21 R. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Carson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1911See Merryman v. Railroad Co., 85 Iowa, 634 ; Masser v. Railroad Co., 68 Iowa, 602 ; Carson v. Railroad Co., 96 Iowa, 583 ; Brown v. Canning Co., 132 Iowa, 634 ; Keefe v. Electric Co., 21 R. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Springer v. Bartle
green
1 sentence1888The case is distinguishable from Springer v. Bartle, 46 Iowa, 688 , and Broquet v. Sterling, 56 Iowa, 358 , cited by counsel. | 1 | 1888–1888 |
Cooley v. Smith
neutral
1 sentence1877Cooley v. Smith, 17 Iowa, 99 . | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.