establishment clause in Arizona

10 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saintsgreen texapp · 2000 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi’s contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church’s missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) ( 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi's contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church's missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) (	2	2
Esformes v. Brinngreen nyappdiv · 2008 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi’s contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church’s missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) ( 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi’s contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church’s missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) (	2	2
Fritts v. Ericsongreen ariz · 1960 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1968–1982 2 sentences 1968The burden of proof is upon the person claiming title by adverse possession to show that the requisite elements thereof have been satisfied, and there are no equities favoring the establishment of his claim, Fritts v. Ericson, 87 Ariz. 227, 230 , 349 P.2d 1107, 1109 (1960). 1968The burden of proof is upon the person claiming title by adverse possession to show that the requisite elements thereof have been satisfied, and there are no equities favoring the establishment of his claim, Fritts v. Ericson, 87 Ariz. 227, 230 , 349 P.2d 1107, 1109 (1960).	2	2
Preston v. Amadeigreen arizctapp · 2015 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 2 sentences 2016See Preston, 238 Ariz. 124, ¶ 15 , 357 P.3d at 165 . ¶ 17 When they filed their complaint in July 2013, the Rasors also filed a notice certifying that the action involved a breach of professional duty and “aeknowledg[ing] the establishment of standard of care and breach requires expert testimony.” The deadline to disclose expert opinions was June 27, 2014. 2016See Preston, 238 Ariz. 124, ¶ 15 , 357 P.3d at 165 . ¶ 17 When they filed their complaint in July 2013, the Rasors also filed a notice certifying that the action involved a breach of professional duty and “aeknowledg[ing] the establishment of standard of care and breach requires expert testimony.” The deadline to disclose expert opinions was June 27, 2014.	1	1
Chandler v. Jacksongreen arizctapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996“There are no equities favoring the establishment of such a claim.” Chandler v. Jackson, 148 Ariz. 307, 311 , 714 P.2d 477, 481 (App.1986). 1996“There are no equities favoring the establishment of such a claim.” Chandler v. Jackson, 148 Ariz. 307, 311 , 714 P.2d 477, 481 (App.1986).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

Case	Negative	Cited
Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrisongreen miss · 2005 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi’s contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church’s missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) ( 2010See Esformes v. Brinn, 52 A.D.3d 459 , 860 N.Y.S.2d 547, 547 (2008) (holding resolution of dispute between members, board of directors, and board of trustees of church regarding termination of rabbi's contract violates the establishment clause); Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 18 S.W.3d 877, 892-93 (Tex.App.2000) (finding the establishment clause prohibits civil courts from determining whether church's missionary training program adequately prepares missionaries for life abroad); but see Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Morrison, 905 So.2d 1213, 1229-30 (Miss.2005) (	2	2

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Bowen v. Kendrick green scotus · 1988 2 sentences 2009Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602-04 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988); Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 586-87 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987). 2009Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602-04 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988); Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 586-87 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987).	1	2009–2009
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris green scotus · 2002 2 sentences 2009Id. at 648-49, 122 S.Ct. 2460 . 2009Zelman, 536 U.S. at 648-49 , 122 S.Ct. 2460 ; Edwards, 482 U.S. at 599 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 (Powell, J., concurring).	1	2009–2009
Edwards v. Aguillard green scotus · 1987 2 sentences 2009Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602-04 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988); Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 586-87 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987). 2009Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602-04 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988); Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 586-87 , 107 S.Ct. 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987).	1	2009–2009
Community Council v. Jordan green ariz · 1967 2 sentences 2008Witters v. Washington Dep’t of Servs. for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481, 485 , 106 S.Ct. 748 , 88 L.Ed 846 (1986). ¶ 9 In Jordan , our supreme court considered the constitutionality of state payments partially reimbursing the Salvation Army, a religious organization, for emergency welfare sendees it had provided to individuals and families under a contract with the Arizona Department of Public Welfare. 102 Ariz. at 450 , 432 P.2d at 462 . 2008Witters v. Washington Dep’t of Servs. for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481, 485 , 106 S.Ct. 748 , 88 L.Ed 846 (1986). ¶ 9 In Jordan , our supreme court considered the constitutionality of state payments partially reimbursing the Salvation Army, a religious organization, for emergency welfare sendees it had provided to individuals and families under a contract with the Arizona Department of Public Welfare. 102 Ariz. at 450 , 432 P.2d at 462 .	1	2008–2008
Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind green scotus · 1986 2 sentences 2008Witters v. Washington Dep’t of Servs. for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481, 485 , 106 S.Ct. 748 , 88 L.Ed 846 (1986). ¶ 9 In Jordan , our supreme court considered the constitutionality of state payments partially reimbursing the Salvation Army, a religious organization, for emergency welfare sendees it had provided to individuals and families under a contract with the Arizona Department of Public Welfare. 102 Ariz. at 450 , 432 P.2d at 462 . 2008Witters v. Washington Dep’t of Servs. for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481, 485 , 106 S.Ct. 748 , 88 L.Ed 846 (1986). ¶ 9 In Jordan , our supreme court considered the constitutionality of state payments partially reimbursing the Salvation Army, a religious organization, for emergency welfare sendees it had provided to individuals and families under a contract with the Arizona Department of Public Welfare. 102 Ariz. at 450 , 432 P.2d at 462 .	1	2008–2008
Combs v. DuBois green arizctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1986Combs v. DuBois, 135 Ariz. 465 , 662 P.2d 140 (App. 1982). 1986Combs v. DuBois, 135 Ariz. 465 , 662 P.2d 140 (App. 1982).	1	1986–1986
Tenney v. Luplow green ariz · 1968 2 sentences 1982Tenney v. Luplow, 103 Ariz. 363 , 442 P.2d 107 (1968); Fritts v. Ericson, 87 Ariz. 227, 230 , 349 P.2d 1107, 1109 (1960). 1982Tenney v. Luplow, 103 Ariz. 363 , 442 P.2d 107 (1968); Fritts v. Ericson, 87 Ariz. 227, 230 , 349 P.2d 1107, 1109 (1960).	1	1982–1982
Lewis v. Farrah green ariz · 1947 2 sentences 1960Lewis v. Farrah, 65 Ariz. 320 , 180 P.2d 578 . 1960Lewis v. Farrah, 65 Ariz. 320 , 180 P.2d 578 .	1	1960–1960

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-526 (5) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01 (3) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-521 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 89 (1921–2025) NY 53 (1861–2026) FL 43 (1938–2026) OH 42 (1953–2025) WA 42 (1895–2026) MI 39 (1909–2020) IL 39 (1887–2021) PA 39 (1917–2024) NJ 37 (1897–2019) WI 31 (1844–2020) MA 29 (1910–2018) TX 28 (1912–2023) MD 24 (1914–2023) CO 24 (1892–2015) CT 22 (1923–2025) OR 22 (1895–2025) MN 17 (1926–2016) AL 16 (1868–2015) AR 15 (1908–2021) OK 14 (1913–2024) IA 13 (1877–2018) NM 12 (1888–2015) LA 12 (1917–2000) TN 12 (1917–2013) GA 11 (1925–2023) NE 10 (1886–2003) AZ 10 (1960–2016) MO 10 (1906–2011) KS 10 (1901–1996) KY 9 (1899–2023) MS 8 (1950–2005) UT 8 (1986–2022) IN 8 (1942–2005) VA 8 (1925–2015) ME 7 (1844–2006) ID 7 (1890–1996) NC 7 (1874–2011) MT 6 (1878–2012) SC 5 (1846–2021) VT 5 (1979–2017) DC 5 (1982–1997) HI 5 (1987–2020) ND 4 (1895–1986) AK 4 (1979–2022) NV 4 (1959–2022) WV 4 (1950–2014) NH 4 (1967–1995) RI 2 (1919–1980) DE 2 (1974–1990) PR 2 (1942–1956)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check