8 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1950–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York
green
2 sentences2005Our current interpretive guidance for an Establishment Clause analysis is Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2135 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), which describes the primary purpose of the Establishment Clause as preventing "sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity." Id. at 612 (quoting from Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664, 668 , 90 S.Ct. 1409 , 25 L.Ed.2d 697 (1970)). ś 29. 2005Our current interpretive guidance for an Establishment Clause analysis is Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2135 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), which describes the primary purpose of the Establishment Clause as preventing "sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity." Id. at 612 (quoting from Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664, 668 , 90 S.Ct. 1409 , 25 L.Ed.2d 697 (1970)). ś 29. | 2 | 2003–2005 |
Lemon v. Kurtzman
red
2 sentences2005Our current interpretive guidance for an Establishment Clause analysis is Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2135 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), which describes the primary purpose of the Establishment Clause as preventing "sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity." Id. at 612 (quoting from Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664, 668 , 90 S.Ct. 1409 , 25 L.Ed.2d 697 (1970)). ś 29. 2005Our current interpretive guidance for an Establishment Clause analysis is Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2135 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971), which describes the primary purpose of the Establishment Clause as preventing "sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity." Id. at 612 (quoting from Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664, 668 , 90 S.Ct. 1409 , 25 L.Ed.2d 697 (1970)). ś 29. | 2 | 2003–2005 |
Thayer v. South Carolina Tax Commission
green
2 sentences1998Thayer, 413 S.E.2d at 813-14 . 1996Thayer, 413 S.E.2d at 813-14 . | 2 | 1996–1998 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1987Batson holds that a state criminal defendant establishes a prima facie case of such a violation on a showing (1) that he is a member of a "cognizable racial group," (2) that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges toward the elimination of veniremen of the defendant's race and (3) that attendant facts and circumstances infer that these challenges were made for the purpose of striking minorities from the jury. ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. at 1722-23 , 90 L.Ed.2d at 87 . 1987Batson holds that a state criminal defendant establishes a prima facie case of such a violation on a showing (1) that he is a member of a "cognizable racial group," (2) that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges toward the elimination of veniremen of the defendant's race and (3) that attendant facts and circumstances infer that these challenges were made for the purpose of striking minorities from the jury. ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. at 1722-23 , 90 L.Ed.2d at 87 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Webster v. Kennebrew
green
1 sentence1984Webster v. Kennebrew, 443 So.2d 850 (Miss. 1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Herrington v. Herrington
green
2 sentences1982The best illustration of the limitations of the Mississippi dead man's statute is found in Herrington v. Herrington, 232 Miss. 244 , 98 So.2d 646 (1957), wherein we upheld the establishment of the claim by the claimant's own spouse. 1982The best illustration of the limitations of the Mississippi dead man's statute is found in Herrington v. Herrington, 232 Miss. 244 , 98 So.2d 646 (1957), wherein we upheld the establishment of the claim by the claimant's own spouse. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Grantham v. State
neutral
2 sentences1950This case does not contain the features .present in the border line cases of Brown v. State, 192 Miss. 314 , 5 So. (2d) 426 , and Grantham v. State, 190 Miss. 887 , 2 So. (2d) 150, 151 . 1950This case does not contain the features .present in the border line cases of Brown v. State, 192 Miss. 314 , 5 So. (2d) 426 , and Grantham v. State, 190 Miss. 887 , 2 So. (2d) 150, 151 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Brown v. State
neutral
2 sentences1950This case does not contain the features .present in the border line cases of Brown v. State, 192 Miss. 314 , 5 So. (2d) 426 , and Grantham v. State, 190 Miss. 887 , 2 So. (2d) 150, 151 . 1950This case does not contain the features .present in the border line cases of Brown v. State, 192 Miss. 314 , 5 So. (2d) 426 , and Grantham v. State, 190 Miss. 887 , 2 So. (2d) 150, 151 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.