source doctrine (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

source doctrine in Minnesota

13 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Nix v. Williamsgreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 3 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–2024
2 sentences

2024“The independent source doctrine allows admission of evidence that has been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation.” Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 (1984); see also State v. Diede, 795 N.W.2d 836, 849 (Minn. 2011).

1998The rationale of the inevitable discovery exception, like that of the so-called independent source doctrine, is that exclusion of evidence that would inevitably have been discovered would put the prosecution in a worse position “because the police would have obtained the evidence if no misconduct had taken place.” Id. at 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 .

23
Murray v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1988 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1996–2024
2 sentences

2024So long as “that later acquisition was not the result of the earlier [constitutional violation], there is no reason why the independent source doctrine should not apply.” Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 541 (1988).

2024As there is “no reason why the independent source doctrine should not apply,” we hold that the district court did not err in denying Carbo’s motion to suppress information gathered from the genetic analysis of his garbage. 5 Id. 5 Carbo’s claim that the State forfeited its independent source argument lacks merit.

22
State v. Diedegreen
minn · 2011 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024“The independent source doctrine allows admission of evidence that has been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation.” Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 (1984); see also State v. Diede, 795 N.W.2d 836, 849 (Minn. 2011).

11
Lund v. Commissioner of Public Safetygreen
minn · 2010 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Chapter 645 is titled “Interpretation of Statutes and Rules,” and section 645.27 is located in the subsection “Construction of Laws.” And although we stated in Lund v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 783 N.W.2d 142, 143 (Minn. 2010), that Minn. Stat. § 645.27 “codified . . . common-law immunity,” we did not suggest that section 645.27 is a source of immunity.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Green v. Crapo green
mass · 1902
2 sentences

1945J., in Green v. Crapo, 181 Mass. 55 , 58 , 62 N.E. 956 , 957 ).

1945J., in Green v. Crapo, 181 Mass. 55 , 58 , 62 N.E. 956 , 957 ).

21945–1945
Purdy v. . Lynch green
ny · 1895
2 sentences

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N.Y. 502 , 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N.Y. 252 , 261 , 103 N.E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must 'look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place' (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N.Y. 462 , 475 , 40 N.E. 232 , 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N.Y. 502 , 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N.Y. 252 , 261 , 103 N.E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must 'look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place' (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N.Y. 462 , 475 , 40 N.E. 232 , 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

21945–1945
Costello v. . Costello green
ny · 1913
2 sentences

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N.Y. 502 , 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N.Y. 252 , 261 , 103 N.E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must 'look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place' (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N.Y. 462 , 475 , 40 N.E. 232 , 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N.Y. 502 , 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N.Y. 252 , 261 , 103 N.E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must 'look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place' (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N.Y. 462 , 475 , 40 N.E. 232 , 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

21945–1945
In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of Weston green
ny · 1883
2 sentences

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N. Y. 502, 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N. Y. 252, 261 , 103 N. E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must ‘look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place’ (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N. Y. 462, 475 , 40 N. E. 232, 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that ‘a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by’ (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

1945(Matter of Weston, 91 N.Y. 502 , 511 ; Costello v. Costello, 209 N.Y. 252 , 261 , 103 N.E. 148 .) In determining whether the acts of a trustee have been prudent, within the meaning of the rule, we must 'look at the facts as they exist at the time of their occurrence, not aided or enlightened by those which subsequently take place' (per Peckham, J., in Purdy v. Lynch, 145 N.Y. 462 , 475 , 40 N.E. 232 , 236 ); for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' (per Collin, J., in Costello v.

21945–1945
In re the Estate of Adriance neutral
nysurct · 1932
2 sentences

1942R. 346) “for it is an obvious truth that ‘a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by’ * * * and it is impossible to say that trustees are wanting in sound discretion ‘simply because their judgment turned out wrong.’ ” Helpful, too, is the language of the court in In re Estate of Advance, 145 Misc. 345, 352 , 260 N. Y.

1942This is necessarily so ( 200 Minn. 379 , 274 N.W. 530 , 112 A.L.R. 346 ) "for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' * * * and it is impossible to say that trustees are wanting in sound discretion 'simply because their judgment turned out wrong.' " Helpful, too, is the language of the court in In re Estate of Adriance, 145 Misc. 345 , 352 , 260 N Y S. 173 , 181 : "It is entirely true that many financial authorities advocate wide diversity of investment.

21942–1942
State v. Lieberg green
minnctapp · 1996
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015
State v. Richards green
minn · 1996
2 sentences

1998The independent source doctrine permits the admission of evidence obtained during an unlawful search if the police could have retrieved the evidence “on the basis of information- obtained independent of their illegal activity.” State v. Richards, 552 N.W.2d 197 , 203-04 n. 2 (Minn.1996).

1998The inevitable discovery doctrine permits the inclusion of evidence otherwise excluded under the exclusionary rule “if the police would have inevitably discovered the evidence, absent their illegal search.” Id.

11998–1998
Strand v. Special School District No. 1 green
minn · 1986
2 sentences

1987The test for position is thus the source of the rule of realignment: where "practical and reasonable, a school district is required to reassign teaching duties in a manner designed to continue the employment of senior teachers." Id. at 886 . [2] Recognizing the potential difficulties the transferred senior teacher might face because of the rule, the supreme court stated [t]he holder of multiple licenses enjoys better likelihood of continued employment in the event of reductions in the teaching staff and also receives additional compensation based on the multiple licenses; however, at the same

1987The test for position is thus the source of the rule of realignment: where “practical and reasonable, a school district is required to reassign teaching duties in a manner designed to continue the employment of senior teachers.” Id. at 886 . 2 Recognizing the potential difficulties the transferred senior teacher might face because of the rule, the supreme court stated [t]he holder of multiple licenses enjoys better likelihood of continued employment in the event of reductions in the teaching staff and also receives additional compensation based on the multiple licenses; however, at the same ti

11987–1987
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. State green
minn · 1974
2 sentences

1983Peoples cites Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. State, 299 Minn. 1 , 216 N.W.2d 841 (1974), as the source of this requirement.

1983Peoples cites Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. State, 299 Minn. 1 , 216 N.W.2d 841 (1974), as the source of this requirement.

11983–1983
People's Ice Co. v. Schlenker green
minn · 1892
2 sentences

1965In the leading and early case of People's Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , 52 N.W. 219 , Mr. Justice Mitchell declared: "That an order vacating a judgment is appealable as `an order involving the merits of the action' is no longer an open question in this court.

1965In the leading and early case of People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , 52 N. W. 219 , Mr. Justice Mitchell declared: “That an order vacating a judgment is appealable as ‘an order involving the merits of the action’ is no longer an open question in this court.

11965–1965
Anderson v. Liljengren green
minn · 1892
2 sentences

1965In the leading and early case of People's Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , 52 N.W. 219 , Mr. Justice Mitchell declared: "That an order vacating a judgment is appealable as `an order involving the merits of the action' is no longer an open question in this court.

1965In the leading and early case of People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1, 2 , 52 N. W. 219 , Mr. Justice Mitchell declared: “That an order vacating a judgment is appealable as ‘an order involving the merits of the action’ is no longer an open question in this court.

11965–1965
Fortune v. First Trust Co. green
minn · 1937
1 sentence

1942This is necessarily so ( 200 Minn. 379 , 274 N.W. 530 , 112 A.L.R. 346 ) "for it is an obvious truth that 'a wisdom developed after an event and having it and its consequences as a source is a standard no man should be judged by' * * * and it is impossible to say that trustees are wanting in sound discretion 'simply because their judgment turned out wrong.' " Helpful, too, is the language of the court in In re Estate of Adriance, 145 Misc. 345 , 352 , 260 N Y S. 173 , 181 : "It is entirely true that many financial authorities advocate wide diversity of investment.

11942–1942

Where else courts name it

TX 308 (1894–2026) NY 161 (1857–2025) CA 105 (1965–2026) IL 70 (1950–2024) PA 69 (1948–2025) WA 66 (1976–2025) NM 61 (1989–2026) NJ 45 (1975–2025) LA 43 (1956–2025) OR 41 (1979–2025) CO 36 (1982–2026) MI 33 (1975–2025) GA 33 (1941–2024) MA 30 (1979–2025) WI 29 (1955–2025) MD 29 (1979–2025) TN 28 (1977–2023) FL 27 (1981–2026) CT 23 (1976–2026) AZ 23 (1984–2024) ID 22 (1949–2021) DE 21 (1965–2026) OH 21 (1967–2025) MO 19 (1973–2023) UT 18 (1991–2020) NC 18 (1941–2017) IA 16 (1898–2021) VA 15 (2000–2024) ME 14 (1922–2025) MN 13 (1942–2024) DC 12 (1974–2021) AK 12 (1971–2025) KY 12 (1945–2024) IN 11 (1972–2017) MT 11 (1983–2024) KS 10 (1989–2011) MS 10 (1968–2026) SD 10 (1985–2024) HI 9 (1964–2021) ND 8 (1894–2018) NV 7 (2000–2018) AL 6 (1917–2002) SC 6 (1985–2026) WY 5 (1976–2022) VT 5 (1964–2011) NH 4 (2005–2025) WV 4 (1981–2016) NE 4 (1983–2022) OK 3 (1979–2019) RI 3 (1970–2024) VI 2 (1998–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check