continuing violation (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

continuing violation in Oklahoma

11 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1916–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Semke v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle Commissiongreen
okla · 1970 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994Citing Semke v. State, 465 P.2d 441, 445 (Okla. 1970), the Commission asserted that such a violation of a state statute is an injury to the state and its citizens and that a continuing violation is an irreparable injury for which injunctive relief is available.

1994Citing Semke v. State, 465 P.2d 441, 445 (Okla.1970), the Commission asserted that such a violation of a state statute is an injury to the state and its citizens and that a continuing violation is an irreparable injury for which injunc-tive relief is available.

22
Irma Ruth Halferty v. Pulse Drug Company, Inc., D/B/A Pulse Ambulance Servicegreen
ca5 · 1987 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994See e.g., Halferty, 821 F.2d at 270-71 .

1994See e.g., Halferty, 821 F.2d at 270-71 .

22
Independent School District No. 9 v. Glassgreen
okla · 1982 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014A continuing violation is an irreparable injury for which injunctive relief is available." Glass, 1 10, 639 P.2d at 1287 .

2014A continuing violation is an irreparable injury for which injunctive relief is available." Glass , ¶ 10, 639 P.2d at 1237.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Timothy Alldread v. City of Grenada green
ca5 · 1993
2 sentences

1994Id. at 1430 .

1994Id. at 1430 .

21994–1994
Whitman v. Whitman green
okla · 1967
2 sentences

2000The Whitman Court concluded, 1967 OK 162 , V 14, 430 P.2d at 806 : [o]ur decision in Smith v. Funk should be limited and regarded as a holding by this court that when the parents enter into a written separation agreement and the father agrees to pay monthly child support during the minority of the children, and the divorce decree ratifies and confirms the agreement and decrees that the father make monthly payments for the support of the children during their minority, the obligations and rights arising from such judgment survive the death of the father and constitute a continuing claim against

2000The Whitman Court concluded, 1967 OK 162 , V 14, 430 P.2d at 806 : [o]ur decision in Smith v. Funk should be limited and regarded as a holding by this court that when the parents enter into a written separation agreement and the father agrees to pay monthly child support during the minority of the children, and the divorce decree ratifies and confirms the agreement and decrees that the father make monthly payments for the support of the children during their minority, the obligations and rights arising from such judgment survive the death of the father and constitute a continuing claim against

12000–2000
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Braswell green
okla · 1983
1 sentence

1992Oklahoma Bar Association v. Braswell, 663 P.2d 1228, 1232 , f.n. 7 (Okla. 1983). [2] DR 1-102(A)(4) provided "[a] lawyer shall not ... engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation." The only explanation we can discern for charging a violation of the current Rule 8.4(c), rather than the former DR, is that the OBA considered the matter to involve a continuing violation which overlapped into the new Rule which, as noted, became effective July 1, 1988.

11992–1992
Galbraith v. Lackey green
oklacrimapp · 1959
1 sentence

1969Counsel cites Galbraith v. Lackey, Okl.Cr., 340 P.2d 497 (1959) as authority.

11969–1969
Stone v. Bayley green
wash · 1913
1 sentence

1930“Where a contract between a husband and wife pending divorce proceedings provided that the husband was to pay $25 monthly for the maintenance of a minor daughter, the payments ‘to continue during the minority of the child, but to cease upon her earlier death,’ and that the agreement was to be as binding as though incorporated in the divorce ■decree, the obligation survived the death of the husband, and constituted a continuing claim against his estate.” Stone v. Bayley (Wash.) 134 Pac. 820 .

11930–1930
Dillon v. Allen green
iowa · 1877
1 sentence

1916Any other policy would be analyzing crime and distinguishing between illegalities in the unwitting aid of a continuing violation of the law.” In Dillon & Palmer v. Allen, 46 Iowa, 299 , 26 Am.

11916–1916
McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co. neutral
· 1908
2 sentences

1916Rep. 145 , it is said: “The rule to be drawn from these cases, therefore, appears to be, that when an act is absolutely prohibited by statute, or is contrary to public policy, all notes, etc., given in furtherance of that act, are null and void.” In McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co., 21 Okla. 173 , 95 Pac. 779 , this court said: “In a suit on a promissory note, where the proof shows the consideration thereof to be a deed of land from the payee to the payor, in possession of the payee, and held by him in violation of Act Cong.

1916Rep. 145 , it is said: “The rule to be drawn from these cases, therefore, appears to be, that when an act is absolutely prohibited by statute, or is contrary to public policy, all notes, etc., given in furtherance of that act, are null and void.” In McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co., 21 Okla. 173 , 95 Pac. 779 , this court said: “In a suit on a promissory note, where the proof shows the consideration thereof to be a deed of land from the payee to the payor, in possession of the payee, and held by him in violation of Act Cong.

11916–1916

Where else courts name it

CA 155 (1941–2026) NY 113 (1910–2026) TX 101 (1960–2025) IL 91 (1910–2026) NJ 86 (1971–2026) MA 60 (1971–2025) PA 49 (1932–2026) NC 32 (1969–2025) AL 30 (1984–2023) WA 30 (1984–2026) OH 25 (1995–2026) MD 24 (1972–2021) CT 24 (1987–2024) MO 22 (1980–2025) FL 21 (1974–2025) MN 21 (1983–2025) MI 19 (1972–2024) IA 18 (1990–2021) GA 18 (1940–2024) DC 17 (1980–2020) TN 17 (1995–2026) LA 16 (1979–2019) WV 14 (1981–2025) WI 13 (1924–2026) VA 12 (1999–2025) CO 12 (1989–2026) VT 11 (1996–2026) OK 11 (1916–2014) ME 9 (1996–2025) WY 8 (1939–2000) NM 8 (1995–2018) AZ 8 (2008–2021) KS 7 (1980–2025) NH 7 (2006–2016) OR 7 (1977–2023) DE 6 (2015–2024) IN 6 (1984–2023) RI 6 (2005–2026) MS 6 (1940–2018) ID 5 (1984–2008) AK 5 (1994–2022) MT 5 (1999–2022) NE 4 (1929–2007) VI 4 (2005–2024) SD 4 (1980–2000) KY 4 (1992–2023) SC 3 (2015–2018) UT 2 (1992–2019) ND 2 (2009–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check