Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
76 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1900–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Maggettegreen2 sentences2010“The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation, to which all other rules are subordinate, is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature.” People v. Maggette, 195 Ill. 2d 336, 348 , 747 N.E.2d 339, 346 (2001). 2010“The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation, to which all other rules are subordinate, is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the legislature.” People v. Maggette, 195 Ill. 2d 336, 348 , 747 N.E.2d 339, 346 (2001). | 4 | 4 |
Richard Sharif v. International Development Group Co., Ltd., Mohammed Bin Naif Bin Abdul Al Aziz Al Saud, Faisal Al Faraj, and Salah Al Bassamgreen2 sentences2016Sharif v. International Development Group Co., 399 F.3d 857, 861 (7th Cir. 2005). 2016Sharif v. International Development Group Co., 399 F.3d 857, 861 (7th Cir. 2005). | 3 | 3 |
Roche v. Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Mazda, Inc.green2 sentences2017App. 3d 70, 86 , 600 N.E.2d 1218, 1228 (1992) (when car dealer failed to sell consumer “the new Laser based on the terms of the original agreement or to return her used car or the equity in it, a direct violation of the Consumer Fraud Act occurred and resulted in damage to plaintiff”). 2017App. 3d 70, 86 , 600 N.E.2d 1218, 1228 (1992) (when car dealer failed to sell consumer “the new Laser based on the terms of the original agreement or to return her used - 12 - car or the equity in it, a direct violation of the Consumer Fraud Act occurred and resulted in damage to plaintiff”). | 2 | 4 |
Township of Jubilee v. State of Illinoisgreen2 sentences2020If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that counts II and VI were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should loo 2018If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that Counts 2 and 6 were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should look | 2 | 2 |
In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D.green2 sentences2020If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that counts II and VI were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should loo 2018If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that Counts 2 and 6 were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should look | 2 | 2 |
Governor's Office of Consumer Services v. Illinois Commerce Commissiongreen2 sentences1997See Governor's Office of Consumer Services v. ICC , 242 Ill. 1997See Governor’s Office of Consumer Services v. Illinois Commerce Comm’n, 242 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Doe v. Coegreen2 sentences2023App. 3d at 337 . - 10 - No. 1-22-1499 However, negligent supervision claim is a direct claim against an employer for its own misconduct (Coe, 2019 IL 123521, ¶ 33 ), so the fact that MacKelvie breached his fiduciary duty to plaintiff does not mean that Kutak Rock had or breached a duty to supervise MacKelvie. ¶ 23 Plaintiff’s reply brief contends that Kutak Rock “owed [her] a duty of care as a business invitee.” Plaintiff did not make this argument in the circuit court or in her opening brief, so she has forfeited it. 2022Passenger Corp. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc., 2014 IL App (5th) 130257 , ¶ 15 (observing that when a plaintiff raises “a direct claim of negligence against an employer, such as a claim for negligent hiring, negligent training, or negligent supervision,” she “ ‘must prove that the employer’s breach— not simply the employee’s malfeasance—was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s - 12 - injury’ ” (quoting Vancura, 238 Ill. 2d at 375 )); see generally Doe v. Coe, 2019 IL 123521, ¶ 33 (“Negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and negligent retention are all direct causes of action against the empl | 1 | 2 |
Dickerson v. United Statesred2 sentences2019Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 438-42 (2000). 2018Dickerson v. United States , 530 U.S. 428 , 438-42, 120 S.Ct. 2326 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000). | 1 | 2 |
Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.green2 sentences2019“The internal affairs doctrine developed on the premise that, in order to prevent corporations from being subjected to inconsistent legal standards, the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs should not rest with multiple jurisdictions.” VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc., 871 A.2d 1108, 1112 (Del. 2005). 2019"The internal affairs doctrine developed on the premise that, in order to prevent corporations from being subjected to inconsistent legal standards, the authority to regulate a corporation's internal affairs should not rest with multiple jurisdictions." VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc. , 871 A.2d 1108 , 1112 (Del. 2005). | 1 | 2 |
Edgar v. Mite Corp.green2 sentences2019We agree with the plaintiffs' characterization of their suit as a direct claim involving accountant fraud and misrepresentation that occurred in Illinois and reject the defendants' characterization of the suit as an indirect claim implicating the internal affairs of the Cayman Islands' hedge fund. ¶ 26 The internal affairs doctrine, which the accountants have relied upon and the trial court found was applicable, "is a conflict of laws principle which recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation's internal affairs-matters peculiar to the relationships among 2019We agree with the plaintiffs' characterization of their suit as a direct claim involving accountant fraud and misrepresentation that occurred in Illinois and reject the defendants' characterization of the suit as an indirect claim implicating the internal affairs of the Cayman Islands' hedge fund. ¶ 26 The internal affairs doctrine, which the accountants have relied upon and the trial court found was applicable, "is a conflict of laws principle which recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation's internal affairs-matters peculiar to the relationships among | 1 | 2 |
Poulet v. H.F.O., L.L.C.green1 sentence2026App. 3d 1, 7 (1989); see Poulet v. H.F.O., L.L.C., 353 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Dysongreen2 sentences2026In a direct claim, on the other hand, a shareholder “who has a direct and personal interest in a cause of action *** bring[s] suit in an individual capacity even if the corporation’s rights are also implicated.” Id. at 689 . 2026See Davis, 387 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Borgsmiller v. Burroughsgreen2 sentences2026Misappropriation of corporate funds is an injury incurred by the corporation so must be brought in a derivative action, rather than as a direct claim by individuals. - 11 - No. 1-25-0080 Borgsmiller v. Burroughs, 187 Ill. 2026Misappropriation of corporate funds is an injury incurred by the corporation so must be brought in a derivative action, rather than as a direct claim by individuals. - 11 - No. 1-25-0080 Borgsmiller v. Burroughs, 187 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Furbygreen1 sentence2025People v. Furby, 138 Ill. 2d 434, 453-54 (1990); People v. Peterson, 2015 IL App (3d) 130157 , ¶ 88. ¶ 113 Defendant was convicted under an accountability theory based on the premise he went with Wheeler and Price to McCurty’s apartment with the intent to rob him. | 1 | 1 |
Kane v. Doctors Hospitalgreen1 sentence2024Instead, the burden is on hospitals to put their patients on notice of the independent status of the professionals with whom the patients might be expected to come in contact.” Kane v. Doctors Hospital, 302 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Tobolt v. Allstate Insurance Co.green1 sentence2023See Tobolt v. Allstate Insurance Co., 75 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Feltmeier v. Feltmeiergreen1 sentence2023E.g., Feltmeier v. Feltmeier, 207 Ill. 2d 263, 275 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Steenes v. Mac Property Management, LLCgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Malingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Nicholson v. Chicago Bar Ass'ngreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Wise v. FIRST NAT. BANK IN GREENVILLEgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Hartgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Smithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Wilsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vancura v. Katris
green
2 sentences2022Passenger Corp. v. Terracon Consultants, Inc., 2014 IL App (5th) 130257 , ¶ 15 (observing that when a plaintiff raises “a direct claim of negligence against an employer, such as a claim for negligent hiring, negligent training, or negligent supervision,” she “ ‘must prove that the employer’s breach— not simply the employee’s malfeasance—was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s - 12 - injury’ ” (quoting Vancura, 238 Ill. 2d at 375 )); see generally Doe v. Coe, 2019 IL 123521, ¶ 33 (“Negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and negligent retention are all direct causes of action against the empl 2014Id. at 375 . | 3 | 2014–2022 |
Anderson v. McHenry Township
green
2 sentences2015Anderson, 289 Ill. 2014Anderson, 289 Ill. | 3 | 2014–2015 |
Davies v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004We are not persuaded by ESBI's reliance on Davies v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 124 Ill.App.2d 141, 151 , 260 N.E.2d 240 (1970), which ESBI claims stands for the proposition that a trial court is justified in disregarding the evidentiary value of a consent order where no testimony was taken and the order was a mere matter of agreement between the Federal Trade Commission and the respondents in that case. 2004We are not persuaded by ESBI's reliance on Davies v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 124 Ill.App.2d 141, 151 , 260 N.E.2d 240 (1970), which ESBI claims stands for the proposition that a trial court is justified in disregarding the evidentiary value of a consent order where no testimony was taken and the order was a mere matter of agreement between the Federal Trade Commission and the respondents in that case. | 3 | 2003–2004 |
In re Haley D.
green
2 sentences2020If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that counts II and VI were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should loo 2018If they are good enough for a direct claim against Drake, they are good enough for a respondeat superior claim against his employers for that very same conduct. ¶ 32 It is true that Counts 2 and 6 were titled “Negligence—Respondeat Superior.” That did not help matters, but the title of a count has never controlled over the substance of the claim. “[T]he character of [a] pleading should be determined from its content, not its label.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶ 64 (quoting In re Haley D., 2011 IL 110886, ¶ 67 ). “[C]ourts should look | 2 | 2018–2020 |
North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla
green
2 sentences2016Ch. 2004) , and North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, 930 A.2d 92 (Del. 2007), as well as cases citing Production Resources and Gheewalla, are informative. ¶ 35 In Production Resources, the Delaware chancery court addressed whether the plaintiff there, a creditor of an insolvent company, could bring a direct claim of breach of fiduciary duty against the company. 2016Ch. 2004) , and North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, 930 A.2d 92 (Del. 2007) , as well as cases citing Production Resources and Gheewalla, are informative. ¶ 35 In Production Resources, the Delaware chancery court addressed whether the plaintiff there, a creditor of an insolvent company, could bring a direct claim of breach of fiduciary duty against the company. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Pekin Insurance v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010Justice McBride authored the majority decision, which reasoned that “[sjince the Aggen complaint raised a direct claim of negligence against UPS, Swan cannot be solely responsible and Pekin has no duty to defend.” UPS, 381 Ill. 2010Justice McBride authored the majority decision, which reasoned that "[s]ince the Aggen complaint raised a direct claim of negligence against UPS, Swan cannot be solely responsible and Pekin has no duty to defend." UPS, 381 Ill.App.3d at 102 , 319 Ill.Dec. 115 , 885 N.E.2d 386 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of America
green
2 sentences2006Lenz, 833 F. Supp. at 378 . 2006Lenz, 833 F. Supp. at 378 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Goldberg v. Michael
green
2 sentences2006Goldberg, 328 Ill. 2006Goldberg, 328 Ill. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Carrasquilla v. Mazda Motor Corp.
green
2 sentences2005The District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania viewed “plaintiffs’ claim that the restraint system was designed defectively because it lacked an integrated automatic lap belt as a direct challenge to one of the restraint options available to [Mazda] under FMVSS 208.” Carrasquilla, 166 F. Supp. 2d at 176 n.7. 2005The District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania viewed "plaintiffs' claim that the restraint system was designed defectively because it lacked an integrated automatic lap belt as a direct challenge to one of the restraint options available to [Mazda] under FMVSS 208." Carrasquilla , 166 F. Supp. 2d at 176 n.7 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State ex rel. Clark v. Board of Commissioners
neutral
2 sentences1905In State v. Board of Commissioners, 11 Neb. 484 , Beaver v. Trustees, 19 Ohio St. 97 , and Boren v. Commissioners, 21 id. 311, the question of the effect of permitting material changes to be made in the terms and conditions of sealed bids after the bids had been opened was considered and condemned as violative of correct principles of law and as rendering the bids invalid. 1904State v. Board of Commrs., 11 Neb. 484 ; Beaver v. Trustees, 19 Ohio St. 97 -108; Boren v. Commrs., 21 Ohio St. 311 -22; Sanitary Dist. v. Lee, 79 Ill. | 2 | 1904–1905 |
Wheat v. Murphy
neutral
1 sentence2025“A trial court abuses its discretion only where its ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, or where no reasonable person would adopt the court’s view.” Wheat v. Murphy, 2024 IL App (4th) 231307, ¶ 48 . ¶ 46 Here, plaintiff first suggests that the trial court’s decision to bar or limit expert testimony in her refiled case “was a direct violation of the voluntary dismissal statute.” We disagree. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Duffy v. Orlan Brook Condominium Owners' Association
green
1 sentence2023Duffy v. Orlan Brook Condominium Owners’ Ass’n, 2012 IL App (1st) 113577, ¶ 27 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Sterling Radio Stations, Inc. v. Weinstine
green
1 sentence2023Whether an action is derivative or direct requires a strict focus on the nature of the alleged injury, i.e., “whether it is to the [association] or to the individual [unit owner] that injury has been done.” Sterling Radio Stations, 328 Ill. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Terracon Consultants, Inc. green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| In Re Liquidation of Pine Top Ins. Co. green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Village of Algonquin v. Village of Barrington Hills green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| People v. Garstecki green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| People v. Allen green | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| Meskimen v. Continental Illinois National Bank green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Northern Trust Co. v. Gibbs green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| People v. Hudson green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Lindgren v. Moore green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Virgin neutral | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| People v. Gross green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Ralph Henry Cooper v. United States green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Village of North Pekin v. Riviere green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| City of South Lake Tahoe v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| People v. Slaughter green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Gasiorowski v. Homer green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Coursey v. Greater Niles Township Publishing Corp. green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Remsen v. Midway Liquors, Inc. green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Sherman H. Skolnick v. William J. Campbell, B. Franklin Chiles and James Guadagno green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Butts v. Estate of Butts green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| The PEOPLE v. Adams green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Straus v. Buchman green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Fuentes v. Shevin green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| John v. Tribune Company green | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| People v. Spranger green | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| People ex rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Tracey neutral | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| Mirich v. T. J. Forschner Contracting Co. neutral | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.