10 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James v. Buckgreen2 sentences1988In James v. Buck, 111 Idaho 708, 709 , 727 P.2d 1136, 1137 (1986), it was stated: “An action to recover damages for professional malpractice, or for an injury to the person, or for the death of one caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another” must be filed within two years of the date the cause of action accrued. 1988In James v. Buck, 111 Idaho 708, 709 , 727 P.2d 1136, 1137 (1986), it was stated: “An action to recover damages for professional malpractice, or for an injury to the person, or for the death of one caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another” must be filed within two years of the date the cause of action accrued. | 2 | 2 |
Jensen v. Jensengreen2 sentences2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865, 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606, 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discreti 2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865, 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606, 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discreti | 1 | 1 |
Sales v. Peabodygreen2 sentences2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865 , 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606 , 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discre 2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865, 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606, 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discreti | 1 | 1 |
Pedro Pelayo v. Bertha Pelayogreen2 sentences2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865, 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606, 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discreti 2019“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Pelayo, 154 Idaho at 865, 303 P.3d at 224 (quoting Jensen v. Jensen, 9 In this appeal, we only discuss attorney fees, not costs, because the district court vacated and remanded the magistrate court’s award of discretionary costs on intermediate appeal. 38 128 Idaho 600, 606, 917 P.2d 757, 763 (1996)). “[T]he decision to award attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code section 32-704 is reviewed under an abuse of discreti | 1 | 1 |
Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of Americagreen2 sentences2008Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of America, 100 Idaho 523, 529 , 602 P.2d 21, 27 (1979). 2008Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of America, 100 Idaho 523, 529 , 602 P.2d 21, 27 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Bailey v. Baileygreen2 sentences1995Id.; see also Bailey v. Bailey, 107 Idaho 324, 329 , 689 P.2d 216, 221 (Ct.App.1984) (trial judges in divorce cases should state reasons for their decisions on attorney fee issues, which statement should at least note existence of legislative guidelines and identify those factors weighed in reaching a decision). 1995Id.; see also Bailey v. Bailey, 107 Idaho 324, 329 , 689 P.2d 216, 221 (Ct.App.1984) (trial judges in divorce cases should state reasons for their decisions on attorney fee issues, which statement should at least note existence of legislative guidelines and identify those factors weighed in reaching a decision). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ennogreen2 sentences1992State v. Enno, 119 Idaho 392, 409 , 807 P.2d 610, 627 (1991). 1992State v. Enno, 119 Idaho 392, 409 , 807 P.2d 610, 627 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Owengreen2 sentences1983We think that the statute should be given the broader interpretation, particularly in a capital case.' State v. Owen, 73 Idaho 394, 403 , 253 P.2d 203, 207-208 (1953), overruled on other grounds, State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82 (1971). 1983We think that the statute should be given the broader interpretation, particularly in a capital case.' State v. Owen, 73 Idaho 394, 403 , 253 P.2d 203, 207-208 (1953), overruled on other grounds, State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Noble v. Fisher
green
1 sentence2013“Unless the court’s decision cites the legislative factors and demonstrates that such factors were considered, the award of attorney fees is subject to being reversed and remanded.” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Shepherd
green
2 sentences1983We think that the statute should be given the broader interpretation, particularly in a capital case.' State v. Owen, 73 Idaho 394, 403 , 253 P.2d 203, 207-208 (1953), overruled on other grounds, State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82 (1971). 1983We think that the statute should be given the broader interpretation, particularly in a capital case.' State v. Owen, 73 Idaho 394, 403 , 253 P.2d 203, 207-208 (1953), overruled on other grounds, State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82 (1971). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Heese v. a & T TRUCKING
green
2 sentences1983Heese v. A & T Tracking, 102 Idaho 598 , 635 P.2d 962 (1981). 1983Heese v. A & T Tracking, 102 Idaho 598 , 635 P.2d 962 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Miller v. United States
green
2 sentences1980That which the Court does today is a far cry from our observations in Rauch as to the "basic right to be secure in a person's home, guaranteed by the fourth amendment ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; "[t]he very sanctity of the home ..." 99 Idaho at 593 , 586 P.2d at 678 ; the fact that "`[s]uch action invades the precious interest of privacy summed up in the ancient adage that a man's house is his castle.' Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301, 307 , 78 S.Ct. 1190, 1194 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1332 ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; the fact that "[t]he exclusionary rule has been the basic 1980That which the Court does today is a far cry from our observations in Rauch as to the "basic right to be secure in a person's home, guaranteed by the fourth amendment ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; "[t]he very sanctity of the home ..." 99 Idaho at 593 , 586 P.2d at 678 ; the fact that "`[s]uch action invades the precious interest of privacy summed up in the ancient adage that a man's house is his castle.' Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301, 307 , 78 S.Ct. 1190, 1194 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1332 ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; the fact that "[t]he exclusionary rule has been the basic | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Rauch
green
2 sentences1980That which the Court does today is a far cry from our observations in Rauch as to the "basic right to be secure in a person's home, guaranteed by the fourth amendment ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; "[t]he very sanctity of the home ..." 99 Idaho at 593 , 586 P.2d at 678 ; the fact that "`[s]uch action invades the precious interest of privacy summed up in the ancient adage that a man's house is his castle.' Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301, 307 , 78 S.Ct. 1190, 1194 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1332 ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; the fact that "[t]he exclusionary rule has been the basic 1980That which the Court does today is a far cry from our observations in Rauch as to the "basic right to be secure in a person's home, guaranteed by the fourth amendment ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; "[t]he very sanctity of the home ..." 99 Idaho at 593 , 586 P.2d at 678 ; the fact that "`[s]uch action invades the precious interest of privacy summed up in the ancient adage that a man's house is his castle.' Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301, 307 , 78 S.Ct. 1190, 1194 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1332 ..." 99 Idaho at 592 , 586 P.2d at 677 ; the fact that "[t]he exclusionary rule has been the basic | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.