66 Pennsylvania opinions name it 6 courts 1966–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepciongreen2 sentences2019See AT&T, supra. Turning to the merits of Toll Brothers’ equitable estoppel claim, I conclude no appellate relief is due. 2019See AT&T, supra. Turning to the merits of Toll Brothers’ equitable estoppel claim, I conclude no appellate relief is due. | 3 | 3 |
Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of Oakmontgreen2 sentences2021Dipal cites the preemption doctrine, pursuant to which “local legislation cannot permit what a state statute or regulation forbids or prohibit what state enactments allow.” Id. (quoting Huntley & Huntley v. Borough Council of the Borough of Oakmont, 964 A.2d 855, 862 (Pa. 2009)). 2015In the context of oil and gas operations, the Supreme Court addressed the preemption doctrine in Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Borough Council of Borough of Oakmont, 600 Pa. 207 , 964 A.2d 855 (2009). | 2 | 4 |
Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburggreen2 sentences1993See Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg, 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 564 A.2d 546 (1989); Rieders v. Williams port, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), appeal denied, 526 Pa. 643 , 584 A.2d 324 (1991). 1993See Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg, 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 564 A.2d 546 (1989); Rieders v. Williamsport, *374 134 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 298, 578 A.2d 618 (1990), appeal denied, 526 Pa. 643 , 584 A.2d 324 (1991). | 2 | 3 |
International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Davisgreen2 sentences2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)). 2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Wilsbach Distributors, Inc.green2 sentences1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A 1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A | 1 | 7 |
City of Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bankgreen2 sentences1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A 1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A | 1 | 7 |
San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmongreen2 sentences1995However, the doctrine of preemption does not apply when “the activity regulated was a merely peripheral concern of the Labor Management Relations Act.” San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). 1995However, the doctrine of preemption does not apply when “the activity regulated was a merely peripheral concern of the Labor Management Relations Act.” San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). | 1 | 4 |
Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsportgreen2 sentences2019Thus, "absent a pervasive regulation of every aspect of an industry or profession , the preemption doctrine does not apply." Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsport , 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 410 , 630 A.2d 474 , 477 (1993) (emphasis added). 2019Thus, "absent a pervasive regulation of every aspect of an industry or profession , the preemption doctrine does not apply." Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsport , 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 410 , 630 A.2d 474 , 477 (1993) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
Freightliner Corp. v. Myrickgreen2 sentences1996See Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1483 , 131 L.Ed.2d 385 (1995) (claim regarding failure to install antilock brakes in tractor-trailers not preempted); Pokorny, supra (claim regarding failure to install window netting not preempted); Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777 (3d Cir.1992) (claim regarding additional truck illumination equipment not preempted); Swope v. STI Transit Co., 796 F.Supp. 160 (E.D.Pa.1992) (claim regarding failure to place reflective tape on trailer not preempted). 1996See Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1483 , 131 L.Ed.2d 385 (1995) (claim regarding failure to install antilock brakes in tractor-trailers not preempted); Pokorny, supra (claim regarding failure to install window netting not preempted); Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777 (3d Cir.1992) (claim regarding additional truck illumination equipment not preempted); Swope v. STI Transit Co., 796 F.Supp. 160 (E.D.Pa.1992) (claim regarding failure to place reflective tape on trailer not preempted). | 1 | 2 |
Flanders v. Ford City Borough Councilgreen1 sentence2017Flanders v. Ford City Borough, 986 A.2d 964, 970 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp.green1 sentence2016Brown et al v. Marmet Health Care Ctr. et al, 729 S.E.2d 217, 223 (W.Va. 2012). 28 The Supreme Court’s case law, though, provides little guidance as to what state laws might survive a preemption challenge, because it consistently has held that the FAA preempts state law. | 1 | 1 |
Residents Against Matrix v. Lower Makefield Townshipgreen1 sentence2015Residents Against Matrix v. Lower Makefield Township, 845 A.2d 908, 910 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004). 6 (a) Rights reserved by Commonwealth.-- The Commonwealth specifically reserves the sole right and ability to regulate any and all matters related to the operation of the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industry in accordance with this act. (b) Regulations not to conflict.- (1) No municipality or any other political subdivision shall adopt or enforce any ordinance or regulation which differs from or conflicts in whole or in part with the provisions of this act or with the regulations promulgated under this act | 1 | 1 |
Range Resources-Appalachia, LLC v. Salem Townshipgreen2 sentences2013Range Resources v. Salem Township, 600 Pa. 231 , 964 A.2d 869, 876-877 (2009). 2013Range Resources v. Salem Township, 600 Pa. 231 , 964 A.2d 869, 876-877 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Pappas v. Asbelgreen2 sentences2012See Pappas I, 555 Pa. at 351 & n. 5, 724 A.2d at 893 & n. 5. 13 Fourth, the court’s attempt to distinguish the Third Circuit’s decision in Hooven by suggesting that Section 514(a) does not preempt a state cause of action if a plaintiff does not pursue or cannot secure relief for an alleged wrong under ERISA is, simply stated, incorrect. 14 There is nothing in the words of Section 514(a) which reflects a congressional intent to save state laws from preemption in such circumstances. 2012See Pappas I, 555 Pa. at 351 & n. 5, 724 A.2d at 893 & n. 5. 13 Fourth, the court’s attempt to distinguish the Third Circuit’s decision in Hooven by suggesting that Section 514(a) does not preempt a state cause of action if a plaintiff does not pursue or cannot secure relief for an alleged wrong under ERISA is, simply stated, incorrect. 14 There is nothing in the words of Section 514(a) which reflects a congressional intent to save state laws from preemption in such circumstances. | 1 | 1 |
| Hoffman Mining Co., Inc. v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF ADAMS TOWNSHIPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Milton Hershey Schoolgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. RUSH TP., PENNSYLVANIAgreen | 1 | 1 |
| TOWNSHIP OF NORTHAMPTON TP. v. Duffgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Duff v. Township of Northamptongreen | 1 | 1 |
| The Gms Group, LLC and Joseph Costa v. Nathan Bendersongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Driscoll v. Carpenters District Councilgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroitgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re in Regreen | 1 | 1 |
| Fmc Corporation v. Cynthia Ann Hollidaygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board of Philadelphiagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Green v. Dolskygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Anne Duffy Pokorny, Administratrix of the Estate of John Duffy, Deceased v. Ford Motor Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kerr v. Butler Building Trades Councilgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Council of Middletown Township v. Benhamgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United Wire, Metal & Machine Health & Welfare Fund v. Morristown Memorial Hospitalgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La Cuestagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996Because we are not bound by decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and because the preemption analysis of our superior court in Gingold is consistent with the U.S. Su preme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 , 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992), we adopt our superior court’s analysis in Gingold. 6 Article VI of the United States Constitution provides that the laws of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. 1996Because we are not bound by decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and because the preemption analysis of our superior court in Gingold is consistent with the U.S. Su preme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 , 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992), we adopt our superior court’s analysis in Gingold. 6 Article VI of the United States Constitution provides that the laws of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. | 3 | 1995–2006 |
Rieders, Travis, Mussina, Humphrey & Harris v. City of Williamsport
neutral
2 sentences1995For instance, in Rieders v. Williamsport, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), we determined that local taxation of lawyers is not preempted by state regulation of that profession. 1995For instance, in Rieders v. Williamsport, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), we determined that local taxation of lawyers is not preempted by state regulation of that profession. | 3 | 1993–1995 |
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters
green
2 sentences2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)). 2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2013Express Preemption The “critical question in any preemption analysis is whether Congress intended that the federal enactment supersede state law.” Krentz, 589 Pa. at 596 , 910 A.2d at 82 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh
green
2 sentences1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A 1997The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax ... whether the ‘general tenor’ of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation.” Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). . | 2 | 1997–2000 |
New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance
green
2 sentences2000“The basic thrust of the preemption clause, then, was to avoid a multiplicity of regulation in order to permit the nationally uniform administration of employee benefit plans.” 514 U.S. at 657 . (citations omitted) (emphasis added) The court further noted that “[t]he federal statute does not go about protecting plan participants and their beneficiaries by requiring employers to provide any given set of minimum benefits, but instead controls the administration of benefitplans.” 514 U.S. at 651 . 2000“The basic thrust of the preemption clause, then, was to avoid a multiplicity of regulation in order to permit the nationally uniform administration of employee benefit plans.” 514 U.S. at 657 . (citations omitted) (emphasis added) The court further noted that “[t]he federal statute does not go about protecting plan participants and their beneficiaries by requiring employers to provide any given set of minimum benefits, but instead controls the administration of benefitplans.” 514 U.S. at 651 . | 2 | 1996–2000 |
Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25
green
2 sentences1991Finally, we reject plaintiffs argument that “outrageous” conduct by AMTRAK requires us to recognize an exception to the preemption doctrine as it did in Farmer v. Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 25, 430 U.S. 290 , 97 S.Ct. 1056 , 51 L.Ed.2d 338 (1977). 1991Finally, we reject plaintiffs argument that “outrageous” conduct by AMTRAK requires us to recognize an exception to the preemption doctrine as it did in Farmer v. Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 25, 430 U.S. 290 , 97 S.Ct. 1056 , 51 L.Ed.2d 338 (1977). | 2 | 1988–1991 |
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
green
1 sentence2025As we reject Plaintiffs’ contention that we must employ a narrow reading to the PLCAA’s preemption clause, our understanding of the scope of that preemption “must rest primarily on a fair understanding of congressional purpose[,]” which is “primarily … discerned from the language of the pre[]emption statute and the statutory framework surrounding it.” Travieso, 526 F.Supp.3d at 541 (quoting Medtronic, 518 U.S. at 485-86 ) (internal citations and quotations omitted and emphasis removed). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Nutter v. Dougherty
green
2 sentences2019According to Tax Office, the purpose of the "informational registration" that Monroeville requires all business entities operating within its boundaries to undergo is to obtain the information necessary for it to exercise its taxing power, not to control the operational activities of those businesses. 9 The doctrine of preemption "provides, generally, that when the legislature has preempted a field the state has retained all regulatory and legislative power for itself and therefore prohibits local legislation in that area." Nutter v. Dougherty , 595 Pa. 340 , 938 A.2d 401 , 406 (2007) (interna 2019According to Tax Office, the purpose of the "informational registration" that Monroeville requires all business entities operating within its boundaries to undergo is to obtain the information necessary for it to exercise its taxing power, not to control the operational activities of those businesses. 9 The doctrine of preemption "provides, generally, that when the legislature has preempted a field the state has retained all regulatory and legislative power for itself and therefore prohibits local legislation in that area." Nutter v. Dougherty , 595 Pa. 340 , 938 A.2d 401 , 406 (2007) (interna | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Haas v. HOSGOOD
green
1 sentence2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia
green
1 sentence2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUC
green
1 sentence2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board
green
1 sentence2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto
green
2 sentences2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum. 2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Southland Corp. v. Keating
green
2 sentences2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum. 2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Perry v. Thomas
green
2 sentences2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum. 2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila green | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Altria Group, Inc. v. Good green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Holt's Cigar Co., Inc. v. City of Philadelphia green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Hilovsky Liquor License Case green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| County of Delaware v. Township of Middletown green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Nutter v. Dougherty green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville Borough green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Municipality of Monroeville v. Chambers Development Corp. green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| FMC Corp. v. Holliday green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Cuyler v. Adams green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Darr v. Burford red | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Middletown Township v. Alverno Valley Farms green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Swope v. STI Transit Co. green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Miranda v. Fridman green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| cluster 584519 green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G. green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Kurahara & Morrissey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| School District v. Marion County green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board Ex Rel. Scott green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| DeGenova v. Ansel green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.