preemption doctrine (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

preemption doctrine in Pennsylvania

66 Pennsylvania opinions name it 6 courts 1966–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (33)

CaseFollowedCited
At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepciongreen
scotus · 2011 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2019
2 sentences

2019See AT&T, supra. Turning to the merits of Toll Brothers’ equitable estoppel claim, I conclude no appellate relief is due.

2019See AT&T, supra. Turning to the merits of Toll Brothers’ equitable estoppel claim, I conclude no appellate relief is due.

33
Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of Oakmontgreen
pa · 2009 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2010–2021
2 sentences

2021Dipal cites the preemption doctrine, pursuant to which “local legislation cannot permit what a state statute or regulation forbids or prohibit what state enactments allow.” Id. (quoting Huntley & Huntley v. Borough Council of the Borough of Oakmont, 964 A.2d 855, 862 (Pa. 2009)).

2015In the context of oil and gas operations, the Supreme Court addressed the preemption doctrine in Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Borough Council of Borough of Oakmont, 600 Pa. 207 , 964 A.2d 855 (2009).

24
Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburggreen
pacommwct · 1989 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1992–1993
2 sentences

1993See Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg, 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 564 A.2d 546 (1989); Rieders v. Williams port, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), appeal denied, 526 Pa. 643 , 584 A.2d 324 (1991).

1993See Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg, 129 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 564 A.2d 546 (1989); Rieders v. Williamsport, *374 134 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 298, 578 A.2d 618 (1990), appeal denied, 526 Pa. 643 , 584 A.2d 324 (1991).

23
International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Davisgreen
scotus · 1986 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)).

2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)).

22
Commonwealth v. Wilsbach Distributors, Inc.green
pa · 1986 · cited in 7 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–2007
2 sentences

1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A

1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A

17
City of Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bankgreen
pa · 1980 · cited in 7 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–2007
2 sentences

1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A

1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A

17
San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmongreen
scotus · 1959 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1966–1995
2 sentences

1995However, the doctrine of preemption does not apply when “the activity regulated was a merely peripheral concern of the Labor Management Relations Act.” San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959).

1995However, the doctrine of preemption does not apply when “the activity regulated was a merely peripheral concern of the Labor Management Relations Act.” San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959).

14
Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsportgreen
pacommwct · 1993 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–2019
2 sentences

2019Thus, "absent a pervasive regulation of every aspect of an industry or profession , the preemption doctrine does not apply." Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsport , 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 410 , 630 A.2d 474 , 477 (1993) (emphasis added).

2019Thus, "absent a pervasive regulation of every aspect of an industry or profession , the preemption doctrine does not apply." Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of Williamsport , 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 410 , 630 A.2d 474 , 477 (1993) (emphasis added).

12
Freightliner Corp. v. Myrickgreen
scotus · 1995 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–1996
2 sentences

1996See Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1483 , 131 L.Ed.2d 385 (1995) (claim regarding failure to install antilock brakes in tractor-trailers not preempted); Pokorny, supra (claim regarding failure to install window netting not preempted); Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777 (3d Cir.1992) (claim regarding additional truck illumination equipment not preempted); Swope v. STI Transit Co., 796 F.Supp. 160 (E.D.Pa.1992) (claim regarding failure to place reflective tape on trailer not preempted).

1996See Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1483 , 131 L.Ed.2d 385 (1995) (claim regarding failure to install antilock brakes in tractor-trailers not preempted); Pokorny, supra (claim regarding failure to install window netting not preempted); Buzzard v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., 966 F.2d 777 (3d Cir.1992) (claim regarding additional truck illumination equipment not preempted); Swope v. STI Transit Co., 796 F.Supp. 160 (E.D.Pa.1992) (claim regarding failure to place reflective tape on trailer not preempted).

12
Flanders v. Ford City Borough Councilgreen
pacommwct · 2009 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Flanders v. Ford City Borough, 986 A.2d 964, 970 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009).

11
Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp.green
wva · 2012 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Brown et al v. Marmet Health Care Ctr. et al, 729 S.E.2d 217, 223 (W.Va. 2012). 28 The Supreme Court’s case law, though, provides little guidance as to what state laws might survive a preemption challenge, because it consistently has held that the FAA preempts state law.

11
Residents Against Matrix v. Lower Makefield Townshipgreen
pacommwct · 2004 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Residents Against Matrix v. Lower Makefield Township, 845 A.2d 908, 910 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004). 6 (a) Rights reserved by Commonwealth.-- The Commonwealth specifically reserves the sole right and ability to regulate any and all matters related to the operation of the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industry in accordance with this act. (b) Regulations not to conflict.- (1) No municipality or any other political subdivision shall adopt or enforce any ordinance or regulation which differs from or conflicts in whole or in part with the provisions of this act or with the regulations promulgated under this act

11
Range Resources-Appalachia, LLC v. Salem Townshipgreen
pa · 2009 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Range Resources v. Salem Township, 600 Pa. 231 , 964 A.2d 869, 876-877 (2009).

2013Range Resources v. Salem Township, 600 Pa. 231 , 964 A.2d 869, 876-877 (2009).

11
Pappas v. Asbelgreen
pa · 1998 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012See Pappas I, 555 Pa. at 351 & n. 5, 724 A.2d at 893 & n. 5. 13 Fourth, the court’s attempt to distinguish the Third Circuit’s decision in Hooven by suggesting that Section 514(a) does not preempt a state cause of action if a plaintiff does not pursue or cannot secure relief for an alleged wrong under ERISA is, simply stated, incorrect. 14 There is nothing in the words of Section 514(a) which reflects a congressional intent to save state laws from preemption in such circumstances.

2012See Pappas I, 555 Pa. at 351 & n. 5, 724 A.2d at 893 & n. 5. 13 Fourth, the court’s attempt to distinguish the Third Circuit’s decision in Hooven by suggesting that Section 514(a) does not preempt a state cause of action if a plaintiff does not pursue or cannot secure relief for an alleged wrong under ERISA is, simply stated, incorrect. 14 There is nothing in the words of Section 514(a) which reflects a congressional intent to save state laws from preemption in such circumstances.

11
Hoffman Mining Co., Inc. v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF ADAMS TOWNSHIPgreen
pacommwct · 2008 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
11
In Re Milton Hershey Schoolgreen
pa · 2006 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
11
Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.green
pa · 1998 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
11
Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. RUSH TP., PENNSYLVANIAgreen
pamd · 2003 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
11
TOWNSHIP OF NORTHAMPTON TP. v. Duffgreen
pa · 1988 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
11
Duff v. Township of Northamptongreen
pacommwct · 1987 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
11
The Gms Group, LLC and Joseph Costa v. Nathan Bendersongreen
ca2 · 2003 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
11
Driscoll v. Carpenters District Councilgreen
pa · 1990 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
11
Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroitgreen
scotus · 1960 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
11
In Re in Regreen
ca3 · 1999 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
11
Fmc Corporation v. Cynthia Ann Hollidaygreen
ca3 · 1989 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
11
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board of Philadelphiagreen
pacommwct · 1995 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
11
Green v. Dolskygreen
pa · 1996 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
11
Anne Duffy Pokorny, Administratrix of the Estate of John Duffy, Deceased v. Ford Motor Companygreen
ca3 · 1990 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
11
Kerr v. Butler Building Trades Councilgreen
pa · 1972 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
11
Council of Middletown Township v. Benhamgreen
pa · 1987 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
11
United Wire, Metal & Machine Health & Welfare Fund v. Morristown Memorial Hospitalgreen
ca3 · 1993 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
11
Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La Cuestagreen
scotus · 1982 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
11
Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 1978 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (47)

CaseCitedYears
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

1996Because we are not bound by decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and because the preemption analysis of our superior court in Gingold is consistent with the U.S. Su preme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 , 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992), we adopt our superior court’s analysis in Gingold. 6 Article VI of the United States Constitution provides that the laws of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

1996Because we are not bound by decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and because the preemption analysis of our superior court in Gingold is consistent with the U.S. Su preme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 , 112 S.Ct. 2608 , 120 L.Ed.2d 407 (1992), we adopt our superior court’s analysis in Gingold. 6 Article VI of the United States Constitution provides that the laws of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.

31995–2006
Rieders, Travis, Mussina, Humphrey & Harris v. City of Williamsport neutral
pacommwct · 1990
2 sentences

1995For instance, in Rieders v. Williamsport, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), we determined that local taxation of lawyers is not preempted by state regulation of that profession.

1995For instance, in Rieders v. Williamsport, 134 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 298 , 578 A.2d 618 (1990), we determined that local taxation of lawyers is not preempted by state regulation of that profession.

31993–1995
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters green
scotus · 2023
2 sentences

2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)).

2024Nevertheless, the state court must bear in mind that the initial screening of a preemption claim “requires more than ‘a conclusory assertion’ that the NLRA arguably protects or prohibits conduct.” Id. at 776 (quoting Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 394 (1986)).

22024–2024
Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp. green
pa · 2006
2 sentences

2013Id.

2013Express Preemption The “critical question in any preemption analysis is whether Congress intended that the federal enactment supersede state law.” Krentz, 589 Pa. at 596 , 910 A.2d at 82 .

22013–2013
Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh green
pa · 1951
2 sentences

1997We affirm. [4] The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax . . . whether the `general tenor' of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation." Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). [5] Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley Bank, 488 Pa. 544 , 412 A.2d 1366 (1980) (holding that Banking Code of 1965, A

1997The preemption analysis by the Commonwealth Court in Middletown Township focused on "whether the legislature intended to deprive the municipality of its statutory power to levy a business privilege tax ... whether the ‘general tenor’ of the state statute was intended to preempt the field as to local taxation.” Middletown Township, 105 Pa. Commw. at 314 , 524 A.2d at 1040 (citing Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. Pittsburgh, 366 Pa. 374 , 77 A.2d 616 (1951)). .

21997–2000
New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2000“The basic thrust of the preemption clause, then, was to avoid a multiplicity of regulation in order to permit the nationally uniform administration of employee benefit plans.” 514 U.S. at 657 . (citations omitted) (emphasis added) The court further noted that “[t]he federal statute does not go about protecting plan participants and their beneficiaries by requiring employers to provide any given set of minimum benefits, but instead controls the administration of benefitplans.” 514 U.S. at 651 .

2000“The basic thrust of the preemption clause, then, was to avoid a multiplicity of regulation in order to permit the nationally uniform administration of employee benefit plans.” 514 U.S. at 657 . (citations omitted) (emphasis added) The court further noted that “[t]he federal statute does not go about protecting plan participants and their beneficiaries by requiring employers to provide any given set of minimum benefits, but instead controls the administration of benefitplans.” 514 U.S. at 651 .

21996–2000
Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25 green
scotus · 1977
2 sentences

1991Finally, we reject plaintiffs argument that “outrageous” conduct by AMTRAK requires us to recognize an exception to the preemption doctrine as it did in Farmer v. Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 25, 430 U.S. 290 , 97 S.Ct. 1056 , 51 L.Ed.2d 338 (1977).

1991Finally, we reject plaintiffs argument that “outrageous” conduct by AMTRAK requires us to recognize an exception to the preemption doctrine as it did in Farmer v. Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 25, 430 U.S. 290 , 97 S.Ct. 1056 , 51 L.Ed.2d 338 (1977).

21988–1991
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr green
scotus · 1996
1 sentence

2025As we reject Plaintiffs’ contention that we must employ a narrow reading to the PLCAA’s preemption clause, our understanding of the scope of that preemption “must rest primarily on a fair understanding of congressional purpose[,]” which is “primarily … discerned from the language of the pre[]emption statute and the statutory framework surrounding it.” Travieso, 526 F.Supp.3d at 541 (quoting Medtronic, 518 U.S. at 485-86 ) (internal citations and quotations omitted and emphasis removed).

12025–2025
Nutter v. Dougherty green
pa · 2007
2 sentences

2019According to Tax Office, the purpose of the "informational registration" that Monroeville requires all business entities operating within its boundaries to undergo is to obtain the information necessary for it to exercise its taxing power, not to control the operational activities of those businesses. 9 The doctrine of preemption "provides, generally, that when the legislature has preempted a field the state has retained all regulatory and legislative power for itself and therefore prohibits local legislation in that area." Nutter v. Dougherty , 595 Pa. 340 , 938 A.2d 401 , 406 (2007) (interna

2019According to Tax Office, the purpose of the "informational registration" that Monroeville requires all business entities operating within its boundaries to undergo is to obtain the information necessary for it to exercise its taxing power, not to control the operational activities of those businesses. 9 The doctrine of preemption "provides, generally, that when the legislature has preempted a field the state has retained all regulatory and legislative power for itself and therefore prohibits local legislation in that area." Nutter v. Dougherty , 595 Pa. 340 , 938 A.2d 401 , 406 (2007) (interna

12019–2019
Haas v. HOSGOOD green
pa · 2010
1 sentence

2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 .

12017–2017
Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia green
pa · 2011
1 sentence

2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 .

12017–2017
PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. City of Lancaster and PA PUC green
pacommwct · 2015
1 sentence

2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 .

12017–2017
Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board green
pa · 2011
1 sentence

2017Hoffman Mining Co. , 32 A.3d at 593-94 ; Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of Philadelphia , 608 Pa. 146 , 10 A.3d 902 , 907 (2011) ; UGI Utilities, Inc. , 125 A.3d at 863-64 ; PPL Electric Utilities Corp. , 125 A.3d at 844 .

12017–2017
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto green
scotus · 1996
2 sentences

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum.

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . .

12016–2016
Southland Corp. v. Keating green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum.

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . .

12016–2016
Perry v. Thomas green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344; Doctor’s Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 . [J-43-2016] - 30 wrongful death and survival actions in one judicial forum.

2016See Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 344, 131 S.Ct. 1740 ; Doctor's Assocs., 517 U.S. at 688 , 116 S.Ct. 1652 ; Perry, 482 U.S. at 491-92 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 ; and Southland, 465 U.S. at 10 , 104 S.Ct. 852 . .

12016–2016
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila green
scotus · 2004
12012–2012
Altria Group, Inc. v. Good green
scotus · 2008
12011–2011
Holt's Cigar Co., Inc. v. City of Philadelphia green
pacommwct · 2008
12011–2011
Hilovsky Liquor License Case green
pa · 1954
12007–2007
County of Delaware v. Township of Middletown green
pa · 1986
12007–2007
Nutter v. Dougherty green
pacommwct · 2007
12007–2007
Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville Borough green
pa · 1972
12007–2007
Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough green
pa · 1966
12007–2007
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood green
scotus · 1993
12006–2006
Municipality of Monroeville v. Chambers Development Corp. green
pacommwct · 1985
12006–2006
FMC Corp. v. Holliday green
scotus · 1990
12000–2000
Cuyler v. Adams green
scotus · 1981
11999–1999
Darr v. Burford red
scotus · 1950
11997–1997
Middletown Township v. Alverno Valley Farms green
pacommwct · 1987
11997–1997
Swope v. STI Transit Co. green
paed · 1992
11996–1996
Miranda v. Fridman green
njsuperctappdiv · 1994
11996–1996
cluster 584519 green
ca3 · 1992
11996–1996
Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G. green
pa · 1989
11995–1995
Kurahara & Morrissey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation green
scotus · 1993
11995–1995
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters green
scotus · 1978
11995–1995
Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. green
scotus · 1981
11995–1995
School District v. Marion County green
sc · 1920
11995–1995
City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board Ex Rel. Scott green
pacommwct · 1992
11993–1993
DeGenova v. Ansel green
pa · 1988
11992–1992

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 29u.s.c.1144 (9) PA § 53 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2961 (5) USC § 29u.s.c.1001 (5) CFR § 49c.f.r.571.208 (4) USC § 15u.s.c.1392 (4) USC § 15u.s.c.1397 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.1002 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.1132 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.158 (4) USC § 15u.s.c.1381 (3) USC § 29u.s.c.141 (3) USC § 49u.s.c.30103 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 277 (1911–2026) NY 112 (1981–2026) IL 101 (1974–2026) TX 93 (1969–2025) NJ 69 (1971–2026) PA 66 (1966–2025) OH 50 (1975–2026) MN 45 (1984–2019) TN 45 (1987–2022) IN 38 (1981–2024) MI 35 (1970–2025) CO 32 (1972–2025) WA 32 (1972–2021) NM 31 (1987–2019) WI 31 (1980–2025) AZ 30 (1971–2025) IA 30 (1978–2026) MD 29 (1977–2026) MA 27 (1964–2023) FL 24 (1962–2021) LA 23 (1962–2024) OK 20 (1986–2024) GA 19 (1991–2022) MO 19 (1971–2017) AL 17 (1964–2014) MT 16 (1977–2025) KS 16 (1922–2026) OR 14 (1985–2023) NV 14 (2000–2026) SC 13 (1984–2019) NC 13 (1973–2026) NH 13 (1995–2019) CT 12 (1990–2024) HI 12 (1982–2023) UT 11 (1992–2012) NE 10 (1982–2006) KY 10 (1979–2026) MS 9 (1968–2013) ID 9 (1979–2018) AK 8 (1967–2022) DE 8 (1980–2025) WV 7 (2009–2024) VT 7 (1988–2024) RI 7 (1985–2020) ME 6 (1989–2025) AR 5 (1984–2025) ND 5 (1991–2025) VA 5 (1985–2021) VI 4 (2010–2026) SD 4 (1977–2020) DC 3 (1986–2009) WY 2 (2014–2014) PR 2 (2023–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check