8 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxationgreen1 sentence2024DISCUSSION A. New Mexico’s Retroactivity Analysis for Civil Cases {6} Unlike the federal system where a new rule of law announced in a civil case always applies retroactively, see Harper v. Virginia Dep’t of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86, 89, 100 (1993) (adopting rule of universal retroactivity for federal civil cases), New Mexico applies a rebuttable presumption of retroactivity to civil cases, see Beavers, 1994- NMSC-094, ¶ 22 (“Because of the compelling force of the desirability of treating similarly situated parties alike, we adopt a presumption of retroactivity for a new rule imposed by a judicia | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 739-40 . 2001Id. at 739-40 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Ardoin
green
2 sentences1992Id. at 646 , 216 P. at 1050 . 1992Id. at 646 , 216 P. at 1050 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989In the more recent case of Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products, Inc., 233 Kan. 339 , 662 P.2d 1254 (1983), factually identical to the case at bar, the district court found that the submission of a letter brief by a subcontractor to the arbitration panel did not constitute an ex parte communication. 1989In the more recent case of Foley Co. v. Grindsted Products, Inc., 233 Kan. 339 , 662 P.2d 1254 (1983), factually identical to the case at bar, the district court found that the submission of a letter brief by a subcontractor to the arbitration panel did not constitute an ex parte communication. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Medler v. Henry
green
2 sentences1980It followed the rule in Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569 , 57 N.E. 102 (1900), cited in the case of Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275 , 101 P.2d 398 (1940). 1980It followed the rule in Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569 , 57 N.E. 102 (1900), cited in the case of Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275 , 101 P.2d 398 (1940). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Hull v. . Littauer
green
2 sentences1980It followed the rule in Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569 , 57 N.E. 102 (1900), cited in the case of Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275 , 101 P.2d 398 (1940). 1980It followed the rule in Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569 , 57 N.E. 102 (1900), cited in the case of Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275 , 101 P.2d 398 (1940). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
White v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission
green
1 sentence1980These exceptions involve issues of “substantial public interest,” and issues “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Indeed, from this Court’s opinion'in Taos County Board of Education, supra, it is apparent that exceptions to a hard and fast rule exist when interpreting the term “actual controversy.” As stated in People v. Labrenz, 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 824 , 73 S.Ct. 24 , 97 L.Ed. 642 (1952): But when the issue presented is of substantial public interest, a well-recognized exception exists to the general rule that a case which has become moot will | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Labrenz v. Illinois ex rel. Wallace
neutral
1 sentence1980These exceptions involve issues of “substantial public interest,” and issues “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Indeed, from this Court’s opinion'in Taos County Board of Education, supra, it is apparent that exceptions to a hard and fast rule exist when interpreting the term “actual controversy.” As stated in People v. Labrenz, 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 824 , 73 S.Ct. 24 , 97 L.Ed. 642 (1952): But when the issue presented is of substantial public interest, a well-recognized exception exists to the general rule that a case which has become moot will | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Delany v. Padgett
neutral
1 sentence1980These exceptions involve issues of “substantial public interest,” and issues “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Indeed, from this Court’s opinion'in Taos County Board of Education, supra, it is apparent that exceptions to a hard and fast rule exist when interpreting the term “actual controversy.” As stated in People v. Labrenz, 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 824 , 73 S.Ct. 24 , 97 L.Ed. 642 (1952): But when the issue presented is of substantial public interest, a well-recognized exception exists to the general rule that a case which has become moot will | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People Ex Rel. Wallace v. Labrenz
green
2 sentences1980These exceptions involve issues of “substantial public interest,” and issues “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Indeed, from this Court’s opinion'in Taos County Board of Education, supra, it is apparent that exceptions to a hard and fast rule exist when interpreting the term “actual controversy.” As stated in People v. Labrenz, 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 824 , 73 S.Ct. 24 , 97 L.Ed. 642 (1952): But when the issue presented is of substantial public interest, a well-recognized exception exists to the general rule that a case which has become moot will 1980These exceptions involve issues of “substantial public interest,” and issues “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Indeed, from this Court’s opinion'in Taos County Board of Education, supra, it is apparent that exceptions to a hard and fast rule exist when interpreting the term “actual controversy.” As stated in People v. Labrenz, 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 (1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 824 , 73 S.Ct. 24 , 97 L.Ed. 642 (1952): But when the issue presented is of substantial public interest, a well-recognized exception exists to the general rule that a case which has become moot will | 1 | 1980–1980 |
The Styria, Scopinich v. Munroe
green
2 sentences1966The most frequently cited definition seems to be that from Steamship Styria v. Morgan, 1902, 186 U.S. 1 , 22 S.Ct. 731 , 46 L.Ed. 1027 , where the court said: “The term ‘discretion1 implies the absence of a hard-and-fast rule. 1966The most frequently cited definition seems to be that from Steamship Styria v. Morgan, 1902, 186 U.S. 1 , 22 S.Ct. 731 , 46 L.Ed. 1027 , where the court said: “The term ‘discretion1 implies the absence of a hard-and-fast rule. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.