8 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1909–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harruffgreen2 sentences2025“In order to successfully prosecute a suspect for murder under this statute, the prosecution must prove that the Defendant’s conduct established that he was acting with a depraved mind.” State v. Harruff, 2020 S.D. 4, ¶ 39 , 939 N.W.2d 20, 30 (citation omitted). 2025“In order to successfully prosecute a suspect for murder under this statute, the prosecution must prove that the Defendant’s conduct established that he was acting with a depraved mind.” State v. Harruff, 2020 S.D. 4, ¶ 39 , 939 N.W.2d 20, 30 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sleepgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Sleep, 1999 SD 19, ¶6 , 590 N.W.2d 235, 237 . 2001See State v. Sleep, 1999 SD 19, ¶6 , 590 N.W.2d 235, 237 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hartmangreen1 sentence1995Hartman, 256 N.W.2d at 135, n. 12 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Norwest Bank Black Hills, N.A. v. Rapid City Teachers Federal Credit Union (No. 4122)
green
1 sentence1996Id.; Norwest Bank, 433 N.W.2d at 562 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
General Drivers & Helpers Union v. Brown County
green
2 sentences1992General Drivers, 269 N.W.2d at 801 . 1992General Drivers, 269 N.W.2d at 801 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Langford v. Issenhuth
neutral
1 sentence1914The -record purports to show that Ilauff was called as a witness, under Chap. 72, Laws of 1909, “for cross-examination.” This court had occasion to consider this statute ‘in the case of Langford v. Issenhuth, 28 S. D. 451, 134 N. W. 889 . | 1 | 1914–1914 |
State v. Fulwider
neutral
1 sentence1913Precisely the same question was before this court in the case of State v. Fulwider, 28 S. D. 622, 134 N. W. 807 , where this court held that, if a defendant was surprised by the indorsement of the names of new witnesses upon an information, he should have moved for a continuance or postponement of the trial tO' enable him to prepare to meet their evidence, and that, in the absence of a motion to postpone or continue the case, on the ground of surprise, no prejudice can be presumed. [5] In this case, although appellant stated in his objection that he was not prepared for trial, in view of the n | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Rectenbaugh v. Northwestern Port Huron Co.
green
1 sentence1909Rectenbaugh v. Port Huron Co., 22 S. D. 410, 118 N. W. 697 . | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.