quoted rule in Montana

2002One much more favorable to the lessee is followed in Louisiana where, ‘in order to cancel the lease, there must be some evidence that the wells thereon are no longer capable of producing oil or gas in paying quantities; or that the lessee, in closing down the wells, has done so with the intention of abandoning same.’ Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La. 248 , 196 So. 336, 341 .

2002One much more favorable to the lessee is followed in Louisiana where, ‘in order to cancel the lease, there must be some evidence that the wells thereon are no longer capable of producing oil or gas in paying quantities; or that the lessee, in closing down the wells, has done so with the intention of abandoning same.’ Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La. 248 , 196 So. 336, 341 .

1999The Court in Hodgkiss conceded the above quoted rule but added, "[w]here, however, a contract is made with an identified individual under an assumed name, all are bound by the contract." Hodgkiss, 104 Mont. at 333 .

1998The quoted exception clearly does not apply to the situation before us here. ¶21 Hadford also contends that we held one entity liable for the obligations of another by piercing the corporate veil in the similar case of Glaspey v. Workman (1988), 230 Mont. 307 , 749 P.2d 1083 .

1998The quoted exception clearly does not apply to the situation before us here. ¶21 Hadford also contends that we held one entity liable for the obligations of another by piercing the corporate veil in the similar case of Glaspey v. Workman (1988), 230 Mont. 307 , 749 P.2d 1083 .

1977In Resner v. N. P. Railway, 161 Mont. 177 , 505 P.2d 86 (1973), this Court quoted the standard as set out in Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653 , 66 S.Ct. 740, 744 , 90 L.Ed. 916, 923 , a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case.

1977In Resner v. N. P. Railway, 161 Mont. 177 , 505 P.2d 86 (1973), this Court quoted the standard as set out in Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653 , 66 S.Ct. 740, 744 , 90 L.Ed. 916, 923 , a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case.

1977In Resner v. N. P. Railway, 161 Mont. 177 , 505 P.2d 86 (1973), this Court quoted the standard as set out in Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653 , 66 S.Ct. 740, 744 , 90 L.Ed. 916, 923 , a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case.

1977In Resner v. N. P. Railway, 161 Mont. 177 , 505 P.2d 86 (1973), this Court quoted the standard as set out in Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653 , 66 S.Ct. 740, 744 , 90 L.Ed. 916, 923 , a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case.

1976It does not single out the minority juror and ask him to reexamine his views for the purpose of reaching a verdict, a practice this Court found objectionable in State v. Randall, 137 Mont. 534 , 353 P.2d 1054 .

1976It does not single out the minority juror and ask him to reexamine his views for the purpose of reaching a verdict, a practice this Court found objectionable in State v. Randall, 137 Mont. 534 , 353 P.2d 1054 .

1935(Morton v. Mooney, 97 Mont. 1 , 33 Pac. (2d) 262 .) The difficulty in strictly applying the quoted rule here becomes at once manifest.

1935(Morton v. Mooney, 97 Mont. 1 , 33 Pac. (2d) 262 .) The difficulty in strictly applying the quoted rule here becomes at once manifest.

1929(Steven v. Potlatch Oil & Refining Co., 80 Mont. 239 , 260 Pac. 119 .) The quoted clause must be read in connection with the other provisions of the lease.

1929(Steven v. Potlatch Oil & Refining Co., 80 Mont. 239 , 260 Pac. 119 .) The quoted clause must be read in connection with the other provisions of the lease.

1929(Slane v. Curtis (Wyo.), 269 Pac. 31 .) So read, the phrase “at any time” refers to that part of the term which is dependent upon oil or gas being 'found in paying quantities.