Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 1 courts 1937–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Iaukeagreen2 sentences1976An exception to the above quoted rule made for plain error 8 does not apply here because the admissibility of the evidence in this case is controlled by our decision in State v. Iaukea, 56 Haw. 343 , 537 P.2d 724 (1975). 1976In that case we pointed out that the “responsibility for maintaining the delicate balance between probative value and prejudicial effect lies largely within the discretion of the trial court.” Id. 56 Haw. at 349 , 537 P.2d at 729. | 1 | 1 |
State v. . McLeodgreen1 sentence1940In support of its holding, the court quoted the rule applicable to such a situation from State v. McLeod, 152 S. E. 895, 897 (N. C.), as follows: “The general rule is that, if there be any evidence tending to prove the fact in issue, or which reasonably conduces to its conclusion as a fairly logical and legitimate deduction, and not merely such as raises a suspicion or conjecture in regard to it, the case should be submitted to the jury; otherwise not, for, short of this, the judge should direct a nonsuit or an acquittal in a criminal prosecution. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fonseca v. Pacific Construction Co., Ltd.
green
1 sentence1989In the course of that dissent he traced the history of the 1963 statutory overhaul, and noted at 54 Haw. at 592 -93: However, the quoted clause effected a material change. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Iaukea
green
2 sentences1976An exception to the above quoted rule made for plain error 8 does not apply here because the admissibility of the evidence in this case is controlled by our decision in State v. Iaukea, 56 Haw. 343 , 537 P.2d 724 (1975). 1976In that case we pointed out that the “responsibility for maintaining the delicate balance between probative value and prejudicial effect lies largely within the discretion of the trial court.” Id. 56 Haw. at 349 , 537 P.2d at 729. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. Takai
green
1 sentence1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Ciacci v. Woolley
green
1 sentence1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Territory of Hawaii v. Adelmeyer
green
2 sentences1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . 1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Kealoha v. Tanaka
green
1 sentence1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
In Re the Estate of Ching
green
2 sentences1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . 1964Territory v. Adelmeyer, supra, 45 Haw. 144, 156 , 363 P.2d 979, 986 ; Estate of Ching, 46 Haw. 127 , 376 P.2d 125 ; Kealoha v. Tanaka, 45 Haw. 457 , 370 P.2d *109 468; Ginoza v. Takai Electric Co., 40 Haw. 691 ; Ciacci v. Woolley, 33 Haw. 247 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
State v. . Vinson
green
1 sentence1940State v. Vinson, 63 N. C. 335 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Butch v. Shaver
neutral
2 sentences1937In Foster v. Schmahl, 268 N. W. 631 , a more recent case, the Minnesota court repudiated its former decision, saying: “It is insisted that this court in Butch v. Shaver, 150 Minn. 94 , 184 N. W. 572 , adopted the rule that ‘compensation for the loss of *321 vision should be determined without resort to correction by glasses.’ We do not so construe the holding of that case. * * * If there be an implication of the adoption of the foregoing quoted rule this court now must depart therefrom.” In the State of New York where the theory of the law of that State is not indemnity for the loss of a membe 1937In Foster v. Schmahl, 268 N. W. 631 , a more recent case, the Minnesota court repudiated its former decision, saying: “It is insisted that this court in Butch v. Shaver, 150 Minn. 94 , 184 N. W. 572 , adopted the rule that ‘compensation for the loss of *321 vision should be determined without resort to correction by glasses.’ We do not so construe the holding of that case. * * * If there be an implication of the adoption of the foregoing quoted rule this court now must depart therefrom.” In the State of New York where the theory of the law of that State is not indemnity for the loss of a membe | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Foster v. Schmahl
neutral
1 sentence1937In Foster v. Schmahl, 268 N. W. 631 , a more recent case, the Minnesota court repudiated its former decision, saying: “It is insisted that this court in Butch v. Shaver, 150 Minn. 94 , 184 N. W. 572 , adopted the rule that ‘compensation for the loss of *321 vision should be determined without resort to correction by glasses.’ We do not so construe the holding of that case. * * * If there be an implication of the adoption of the foregoing quoted rule this court now must depart therefrom.” In the State of New York where the theory of the law of that State is not indemnity for the loss of a membe | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.