53 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allstate Insurance v. Keillorgreen2 sentences2008See Allstate Ins Co v Keillor (After Remand), 450 Mich 412 , 416 n 2; 537 NW2d 589 (1995) (holding that the insurer was not estopped from asserting a policy defense not contained in its reservation of rights letter where the delay was not unreasonable and the insured was not prejudiced). 2008See Allstate Ins Co v Keillor (After Remand), 450 Mich 412 , 416 n 2; 537 NW2d 589 (1995) (holding that the insurer was not estopped from asserting a policy defense not contained in its reservation of rights letter where the delay was not unreasonable and the insured was not prejudiced). | 1 | 2 |
Allison v. Chandlergreen2 sentences1981However this question may be answered, we cannot resist the conclusion that it is better to run a slight risk of giving somewhat more than actual compensation, than to adopt a rule which, under the circumstances of the case, will, in all reasonable probability, preclude the injured party from the recovery of a large proportion of the damages he has actually sustained from the injury, though the amount thus excluded cannot be estimated with accuracy by a fixed and certain rule.’ Allison v Chandler, 11 Mich 542, 554 [1863].” See, also, Gilbert v Kennedy, 22 Mich 117, 130-131 (1871), Kalamazoo v 1965However this question may be answered, we cannot resist the conclusion that it is better to run a slight risk of giving somewhat more than actual compensation, than to adopt a rule which, under the circumstances of the case, will, in all reasonable probability, preclude the injured party from the recovery of a large proportion of the damages he has actually sustained from the injury, though the amount thus excluded cannot be estimated with accuracy by a fixed and certain rule.” Allison v. Chandler, 11 Mich 542, 554 . | 1 | 2 |
Purcell v. Keegangreen2 sentences1981We do not, "in the assessment of damages, require a mathematical precision in situations of injury where, from the very nature of the circumstances, precision is unattainable.” Particularly is this true where it is defendant’s own act or neglect that has caused the imprecision.’ Purcell v Keegan, 359 Mich 571, 576 [ 103 NW2d 494 (1960)]. *806 "The policy for this rule of damages was stated by Justice Christiancy: " 'Since, from the nature of the case, the damages cannot be estimated with certainty, and there is a risk of giving by one course of trial less, and by the other more than a fair com 1981We do not, "in the assessment of damages, require a mathematical precision in situations of injury where, from the very nature of the circumstances, precision is unattainable.” Particularly is this true where it is defendant’s own act or neglect that has caused the imprecision.’ Purcell v Keegan, 359 Mich 571, 576 [ 103 NW2d 494 (1960)]. *806 "The policy for this rule of damages was stated by Justice Christiancy: " 'Since, from the nature of the case, the damages cannot be estimated with certainty, and there is a risk of giving by one course of trial less, and by the other more than a fair com | 1 | 2 |
Smitham v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.green2 sentences2024See Smitham v State Farm Fire & Cas Co, 297 Mich App 537, 538 ; 824 NW2d 601 (2012) (concluding that a party’s failure to invoke the appraisal process did not affect the determination of “the timeliness of an action for alleged underpayment of a claim.”). 2024See Smitham v State Farm Fire & Cas Co, 297 Mich App 537, 538 ; 824 NW2d 601 (2012) (concluding that a party’s failure to invoke the appraisal process did not affect the determination of “the timeliness of an action for alleged underpayment of a claim.”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Grantgreen2 sentences2024See People v Grant, 455 Mich 221 , 230 n 10; 565 NW2d 389 (1997) (“[A] legislative enactment that requires a defendant to return victims to something resembling their precrime status contrasts with the policy factors of rehabilitation, deterrence, protection of society, and punishment, that 10 Indeed, neither of the parties identified these factors as relevant to the present analysis. 16 are the general foundation for criminal sentences usually involving a term of imprisonment, a fine, or both.”). 2024See People v Grant, 455 Mich 221 , 230 n 10; 565 NW2d 389 (1997) (“[A] legislative enactment that requires a defendant to return victims to something resembling their precrime status contrasts with the policy factors of rehabilitation, deterrence, protection of society, and punishment, that 10 Indeed, neither of the parties identified these factors as relevant to the present analysis. 16 are the general foundation for criminal sentences usually involving a term of imprisonment, a fine, or both.”). | 1 | 1 |
Collins v. Waldengreen1 sentence2023The court in Collins v Walden, 613 F Supp 1306, 1315 (ND Ga, 1985), expressed why immunity should be granted to all witnesses who provide relevant information during the truth-gathering process of litigation: In addition, it appears to the court that the policies which support immunity for witnesses also support immunity for other participants in the judicial process. | 1 | 1 |
Viera v. Deutsche Bank National Trustgreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., Agee v. Brown , 73 So.3d 882 , 886 (Fla. App., 2011) ("The best way to protect the public from unethical attorneys in the drafting of wills ... is entirely within the province of the Florida *337 Legislature."); Sandford v. Metcalfe , 110 Conn. App. 162 , 169-170, 954 A.2d 188 (2008) ("[I]t is ill-advised, as a matter of public policy, for an attorney to draft a will in which she is to receive a bequest"; "[t]here is, however, no statute barring an attorney who drafted a testamentary instrument from inheriting by the instrument she drafted"; and "[i]f the law is to be changed to mak | 1 | 1 |
Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual Insurancegreen1 sentence2017See Detroit Edison Co, 102 Mich App at 142 . | 1 | 1 |
MFA Mutual Insurance Company v. Huddlestongreen1 sentence2000See Commercial Standard Ins Co of Fort Worth, Texas v Hitson, 73 NM 328 , 332; 388 P2d 56 (1963) (Interpreting a standard mortgage clause, the court stated “[a]s we view this language, it clearly states that where the payment has been made to the mortgagee, but the insurance coverage had been voided for some reason, there was present a right in the insurance companies to recover back from the ‘mortgagor or owner’ ”); MFA Mut Ins Co v Huddleston, 459 SW2d 104, 106 (Mo App, 1970) (“[Wjhere the policy is ‘void’ as to the insured . . . , the Company [insurer] may acquire the mortgage security upon | 1 | 1 |
| Rubin v. Gallaghergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gilbert v. Kennedygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Mitchell v. Boussongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cebulak v. Lewisgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. Auto Club Insurance Association
green
2 sentences2018In Harris, the Court stated that the plaintiff could not take advantage of the uncoordinated medical benefit provision in the policy because his claim did not flow from the subject policy but instead arose “solely by statute.” Id. at 472 . 2018In Harris, the Court stated that the plaintiff could not take advantage of the uncoordinated medical benefit provision in the policy because his claim did not flow from the subject policy but instead arose “solely by statute.” Id. at 472 . | 4 | 2017–2018 |
Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance Company
green
2 sentences2021Bazzi, 502 Mich at 401 . 2020Bazzi, 502 Mich at 400-401 , was a mandatory-benefits case, and it thus addressed the separate question of whether a no-fault insurer could raise the common-law defense of fraud in the procurement of the policy to a claim for coverage mandated by the no-fault act or whether the Legislature abrogated that defense when it enacted the no-fault act. | 3 | 2020–2021 |
Allstate Insurance v. Freeman
green
2 sentences2004Freeman, supra at 700 , 443 N.W.2d 734 , correctly identified the first question under policy language before the Court as whether "the insured acted either intentionally or criminally." I agree with the lead opinion that the policy requirement that McCarn acted intentionally or criminally is met. 2004Freeman, supra at 700 , correctly identified the first question under policy language before the Court as whether “the insured acted either intentionally or criminally.” I agree with the lead opinion that the policy requirement that McCarn acted intentionally or criminally is met. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Meirthew v. Last
green
2 sentences1999When a conflict of interest even a mere possibility thereofarises, the law suggests (if it does not require) that the insurer act promptly and openly, on peril of estoppel, preferably upon a record made in the pending case (if pending as here) with the court fully apprised of all necessary details; also that the insurer act thus on time for arms' length actions which may protect the respective rights of both parties to the contract of insurance. [ Id. at 38 , 135 N.W.2d 353 .] We disagree that this statement requires the insurance company, which is not a party to the suit, to notify a plaint 1986When a conflict of interest—even a mere possibility thereof—arises, the law suggests (if it does not require) that the insurer act promptly and openly, on peril of estoppel, preferably upon a record made in the pending case (if pending as here) with the court fully apprised of all necessary details; also that the insurer act thus on time for arms’ length actions which may protect the respective rights of both parties to the contract of insurance. [Meirthew, supra, p 38 . | 2 | 1986–1999 |
McReynolds v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020The federal appeals court concluded, “[i]f the teaming policy causes racial discrimination and is not justified by business necessity, then it violates Title VII as ‘disparate impact’ employment discrimination— and whether it causes racial discrimination and whether it nonetheless is justified by business necessity are issues common to the entire class and therefore appropriate for class-wide determination.” Id. -7- Also instructive is Ellis v Costco Wholesale Corp, 285 FRD 492 (ND Cal, 2012), which follows the reasoning of McReynolds in distinguishing the claims of the plaintiffs alleging dis | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bahri v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. Dells
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 378-379 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Sandford v. Metcalfe
neutral
2 sentences2018See, e.g., Agee v. Brown , 73 So.3d 882 , 886 (Fla. App., 2011) ("The best way to protect the public from unethical attorneys in the drafting of wills ... is entirely within the province of the Florida *337 Legislature."); Sandford v. Metcalfe , 110 Conn. App. 162 , 169-170, 954 A.2d 188 (2008) ("[I]t is ill-advised, as a matter of public policy, for an attorney to draft a will in which she is to receive a bequest"; "[t]here is, however, no statute barring an attorney who drafted a testamentary instrument from inheriting by the instrument she drafted"; and "[i]f the law is to be changed to mak 2018See, e.g., Agee v. Brown , 73 So.3d 882 , 886 (Fla. App., 2011) ("The best way to protect the public from unethical attorneys in the drafting of wills ... is entirely within the province of the Florida *337 Legislature."); Sandford v. Metcalfe , 110 Conn. App. 162 , 169-170, 954 A.2d 188 (2008) ("[I]t is ill-advised, as a matter of public policy, for an attorney to draft a will in which she is to receive a bequest"; "[t]here is, however, no statute barring an attorney who drafted a testamentary instrument from inheriting by the instrument she drafted"; and "[i]f the law is to be changed to mak | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Terrien v. Zwit
green
2 sentences2018This is especially true when the determination or resolution requires placing a premium on one societal interest at the expense of another: The responsibility for drawing lines in a society as complex as ours-of identifying priorities, weighing the relevant considerations and choosing between competing alternatives-is the Legislature's, not the judiciary's. [ Terrien v. Zwit , 467 Mich. 56 , 67, 648 N.W.2d 602 (2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted).] If the current policy framework is insufficient to protect a decedent when MRPC 1.8(c) has been breached, and any further inquiry into the 2018This is especially true when the determination or resolution requires placing a premium on one societal interest at the expense of another: The responsibility for drawing lines in a society as complex as ours-of identifying priorities, weighing the relevant considerations and choosing between competing alternatives-is the Legislature's, not the judiciary's. [ Terrien v. Zwit , 467 Mich. 56 , 67, 648 N.W.2d 602 (2002) (quotation marks and citation omitted).] If the current policy framework is insufficient to protect a decedent when MRPC 1.8(c) has been breached, and any further inquiry into the | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Herweyer v. Clark Highway Services, Inc
green
2 sentences2005Relying on Herweyer v Clark Hwy Services, Inc, 455 Mich 14 ; 564 NW2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and “should receive close judicial scrutiny.” 262 Mich App at 687 . 471 Mich 904 (2004). 2005Relying on Herweyer v Clark Hwy Services, Inc, 455 Mich 14 ; 564 NW2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and “should receive close judicial scrutiny.” 262 Mich App at 687 . 471 Mich 904 (2004). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Rory v. Continental Insurance
green
2 sentences2005In Williams, the panel considered identical policy language and concluded that the one-year limitation was “not so unreasonable as to be unenforceable” because the policy required that a claim be filed within a year, rather than a lawsuit. 262 Mich App 679 ; 687 NW2d 304 (2004). 2005In Williams, the panel considered identical policy language and concluded that the one-year limitation was “not so unreasonable as to be unenforceable” because the policy required that a claim be filed within a year, rather than a lawsuit. 262 Mich App 679 ; 687 NW2d 304 (2004). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Rory v. Continental Ins. Co.
neutral
1 sentence2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Castle Inv. Co. v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences2005Relying on Herweyer v Clark Hwy Services, Inc, 455 Mich 14 ; 564 NW2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and “should receive close judicial scrutiny.” 262 Mich App at 687 . 471 Mich 904 (2004). 2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Van v. Zahorik
green
2 sentences2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. 2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Radtke v. Everett
green
2 sentences2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. 2005Services, Inc., 455 Mich. 14 , 564 N.W.2d 857 (1997), the Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the insurance policy was adhesive and "should receive close judicial scrutiny." 262 Mich.App. at 687 , 687 N.W.2d 304 . [4] 471 Mich. 904 , 688 N.W.2d 93 (2004). [5] Van v. Zahorik, 460 Mich. 320 , 597 N.W.2d 15 (1999). [6] Radtke v. Everett, 442 Mich. 368, 374 , 501 N.W.2d 155 (1993). [7] Archambo v. Lawyers Title Ins. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Cohen v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
neutral
2 sentences2001The circuit court ruled that “the insurance policy can only be void if there’s a material misrepresentation in the application for no-fault insurance.” The court granted summary disposition in favor of Ms. Cohen, and ordered that her uninsured motorist claim be submitted to arbitration. 5 The Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal, 6 and later issued a judgment in which it affirmed the circuit court order that sent Ms. Cohen’s uninsured motorist claim to arbitration. 7 238 Mich App 602 ; 606 NW2d 664 (1999). 8 Acia has applied to this Court for leave to appeal. n This case involves issues co 2001The circuit court ruled that “the insurance policy can only be void if there’s a material misrepresentation in the application for no-fault insurance.” The court granted summary disposition in favor of Ms. Cohen, and ordered that her uninsured motorist claim be submitted to arbitration. 5 The Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal, 6 and later issued a judgment in which it affirmed the circuit court order that sent Ms. Cohen’s uninsured motorist claim to arbitration. 7 238 Mich App 602 ; 606 NW2d 664 (1999). 8 Acia has applied to this Court for leave to appeal. n This case involves issues co | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Commercial Stand. Ins. Co. of Ft. Worth, Tex. v. Hitson
green
1 sentence2000See Commercial Standard Ins Co of Fort Worth, Texas v Hitson, 73 NM 328 , 332; 388 P2d 56 (1963) (Interpreting a standard mortgage clause, the court stated “[a]s we view this language, it clearly states that where the payment has been made to the mortgagee, but the insurance coverage had been voided for some reason, there was present a right in the insurance companies to recover back from the ‘mortgagor or owner’ ”); MFA Mut Ins Co v Huddleston, 459 SW2d 104, 106 (Mo App, 1970) (“[Wjhere the policy is ‘void’ as to the insured . . . , the Company [insurer] may acquire the mortgage security upon | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Vector Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2000The federal district court disagreed: Relying primarily on Hawkeye-Security Ins Co v Vector Construction Co, 185 Mich App 369 ; 460 NW2d 329 (1990), Plaintiff argues that there was no accident in this case and thus no occurrence to trigger its obligations under the insurance policy. 2000The federal district court disagreed: Relying primarily on Hawkeye-Security Ins Co v Vector Construction Co, 185 Mich App 369 ; 460 NW2d 329 (1990), Plaintiff argues that there was no accident in this case and thus no occurrence to trigger its obligations under the insurance policy. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Roy Mundry and Charlotte Mundry v. Great American Insurance Company
green
1 sentence1999When a conflict of interest even a mere possibility thereofarises, the law suggests (if it does not require) that the insurer act promptly and openly, on peril of estoppel, preferably upon a record made in the pending case (if pending as here) with the court fully apprised of all necessary details; also that the insurer act thus on time for arms' length actions which may protect the respective rights of both parties to the contract of insurance. [ Id. at 38 , 135 N.W.2d 353 .] We disagree that this statement requires the insurance company, which is not a party to the suit, to notify a plaint | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Schultz
green
2 sentences1997People v Schultz, 435 Mich 517, 531-532 ; 460 NW2d 505 (1990). 1997People v Schultz, 435 Mich 517, 531-532 ; 460 NW2d 505 (1990). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Pritchard v. Norton
green
2 sentences1993Because we are constitutionally obligated to afford full effect to the Kentucky decision, we need not consider this argument. " '[A] civilized State is accustomed and considers itself bound to observe the principle of comity.’ ” Rubin v Gallagher, supra at 128, quoting Pritchard v Norton, 106 US 124, 129 ; 1 S Ct 102 ; 27 L Ed 104 (1882). 1993Because we are constitutionally obligated to afford full effect to the Kentucky decision, we need not consider this argument. " '[A] civilized State is accustomed and considers itself bound to observe the principle of comity.’ ” Rubin v Gallagher, supra at 128, quoting Pritchard v Norton, 106 US 124, 129 ; 1 S Ct 102 ; 27 L Ed 104 (1882). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Canon v. Thumudo green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Capital Mortgage Corp. v. Michigan Basic Property Insurance green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Better Valu Homes, Inc. v. Preferred Mutual Insurance green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Riley v. Richards green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Cooper v. Automotive Finishes, Inc green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| People v. Lorentzen green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Parks v. General Motors Corp. green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Waskin Development Co. v. Weyn green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Routsaw v. McClain green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| City of Kalamazoo v. Standard Paper Co. neutral | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Space Conditioning, Inc. v. Insurance Company of No. Amer. green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Randall green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Commercial Construction Co v. Elsman Enterprises, Inc. neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Cusumano v. Stroh Brewery Co. neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Coles v. Galloway green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| King v. Partridge green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Tait v. Nash neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Jackson v. Sabuco green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.