Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Stategreen1 sentence1997As we explained in Moore v. State, 895 P.2d 507, 511 (Alaska App.1995), the underlying purpose of the peremptory challenge is to allow a party to disqualify a judge when the party “believes that he or she cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial in front of [that] particular judge”, even if the party can not establish “cause” — that is, legal grounds for disqualifying the judge. | 1 | 1 |
DiGiacomo v. DiGiacomogreen2 sentences1994DiGiacomo v. DiGiacomo, 256 N.J.Super. 404 , 607 A.2d 186, 190-91 (1992). 8 .John argues that the QDRO violated various Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure. 1994DiGiacomo v. DiGiacomo, 256 N.J.Super. 404 , 607 A.2d 186, 190-91 (1992). 8 .John argues that the QDRO violated various Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure. | 1 | 1 |
Sheehan v. University of Alaskagreen1 sentence1986See id. at 1297 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993Id. at 291 n. 17. 1993Id. at 291 n. 17. | 2 | 1992–1993 |
DSW v. Fairbanks No. Star Bor. Sch. Dist.
green
1 sentence2004Because the case before us falls within the class of cases covered by existing precedent and the Restatement framework, we need not consider the issue of duty under the policy analysis adopted in D.S.W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School District, 628 P.2d 554 (Alaska 1981). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Chi of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.
green
2 sentences2003Although Bay- less & Roberts was a policy defense case rather than a coverage defense case, in CHI of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 844 P.2d 1113 (Alaska 1993), we adopted the rule of decision of Bayless & Roberts in the context of a coverage defense. 2003Although Bayless & Roberts was a policy defense case rather than a coverage defense case, in CHI of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 844 P.2d 1113 (Alaska 1993), we adopted the rule of decision of Bayless & Roberts in the context of a coverage defense. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1996We accepted the insured’s argument that the ordinance or law exclusion did not apply “where a covered event such as a fire triggers enforcement.” Id. at 1296 . 1996We accepted the insured's argument that the ordinance or law exclusion did not apply "where a covered event such as a fire triggers enforcement." Id. at 1296 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
ALASKA FEDERAL S & L v. Bernhardt
green
1 sentence1993PWC asks us to reconsider whether a pro se attorney litigant may recover Rule 82 fees and, upon reconsideration, to overrule our decision in Burrell. 11 PWC contends that the policy factors articulated in Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Juneau v. Bernhardt, 794 P.2d 579 (Alaska 1990), 12 which factors we concluded bar pro se litigants from receiving Rule 82 attorney’s fees, are applicable to pro se attorney litigants. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
green
2 sentences1960Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 . 1960Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
green
2 sentences1960Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 . 1960Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.