personal injury claim (District of Columbia) · Go Syfert
← District of Columbia issues

personal injury claim in District of Columbia

6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Dunkwu v. Nevillegreen
dc · 1990 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007See Dunkwu v. Neville, 575 A.2d 293, 296 (D.C.1990) (“[I]n this suit between a Virginia resident and a Virginia health care provider arising strictly from events in Virginia, it seems obvious that Virginia’s governmental interest in capping liability for malpractice would outweigh the District’s competing interest for choice of law purposes.”).

11
Watson v. Schevegreen
dc · 1980 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.green
scotus · 1965 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11
Poole v. Lowegreen
dc · 1992 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11
Gladys Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Companygreen
cadc · 1986 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11
People's Counsel v. Public Service Commissiongreen
dc · 1982 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11
Bullard v. Curry-Cloonangreen
dc · 1976 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982As a general rule, the validity of a settlement agreement is determined according to general principles of contract law. 6 Bullard v. Curry-Cloonan, D.C.App., 367 A.2d 127, 131 (1976).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Anderson green
dc · 2001
1 sentence

2020Id. at 333 .

12020–2020
Agnes Rodenbur v. Helen J. Kaufmann green
cadc · 1963
1 sentence

2002Id. at 365, 320 F.2d at 684 .

12002–2002
Union National Bank v. Lamb green
scotus · 1949
2 sentences

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

1993See Poole v. Lowe, 615 A.2d 589 , 592 n. 6 (D.C.1992) (where three-year statute of limitation for a legal malpractice claim ended on a Saturday, under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 6(a) a complaint filed the following Monday would be timely); Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Co., 256 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 24 , 802 F.2d 1416, 1418 (1986) (where last day of three-year statute of limitation for a personal injury claim fell on Sunday, Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a) extended the period an additional day); Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co., supra, 382 U.S. at 32-33 , 86 S.Ct. at 152-53 (where statute and

11993–1993
Matter of Sheehy green
dc · 1983
1 sentence

1985In Matter of Sheehy, 454 A.2d 1360 (D.C.1983), the court considered the Board’s recommendation of disbarment for the following misconduct: the attorney through inept handling and neglect permitted the statute of limitations to run on a personal injury claim.

11985–1985

Where else courts name it

TX 114 (1979–2026) CA 86 (1953–2025) IL 82 (1912–2021) NY 76 (1962–2026) MO 62 (1967–2025) NJ 51 (1961–2025) PA 43 (1923–2026) OH 42 (1992–2025) FL 40 (1961–2026) GA 38 (1969–2024) IN 37 (1949–2026) MS 36 (1978–2026) LA 34 (1957–2020) KY 30 (1912–2025) CO 29 (1981–2025) AZ 29 (1967–2022) WA 28 (1988–2026) CT 25 (1973–2022) MN 25 (1917–2024) WI 23 (1964–2026) VA 22 (1962–2025) AL 22 (1961–2025) MD 22 (1986–2022) WV 21 (1986–2023) IA 19 (1980–2025) OR 18 (1970–2024) NC 18 (1984–2019) MA 16 (1983–2023) MI 16 (1966–2026) TN 15 (1913–2023) KS 14 (1972–2026) DE 12 (1985–2024) UT 11 (1983–2022) NE 10 (1989–2024) RI 10 (1972–2018) ND 10 (1989–2023) SC 10 (1971–2024) NM 9 (1975–2024) ME 9 (1984–2007) SD 8 (1975–2026) MT 7 (1984–2014) DC 6 (1982–2020) VT 5 (1998–2015) NH 4 (2007–2023) AR 4 (1988–2020) OK 4 (1972–2025) AK 3 (1991–2023) NV 3 (1996–2023) HI 2 (1987–2016) VI 2 (2009–2015) WY 2 (1998–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check