Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Radecki v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
green
2 sentences2005Co., 255 Neb. 224 , 583 N.W.2d 320 (1998). (a) Breach of the Insurance Contract in Connection With Untimely Paid and Unpaid Medical Bills Was Not a Prerequisite to Prevailing on the Bad Faith Claim in Connection With Initial Denials for Mary’s Hysterectomy As an initial matter, United Wisconsin argues that because the jury found in United Wisconsin’s favor on the LeRettes’ breach of contract cause of action, its verdict in favor of Mary on the bad faith claim cannot stand. 2005Co., 255 Neb. 224 , 583 N.W.2d 320 (1998). (a) Breach of the Insurance Contract in Connection With Untimely Paid and Unpaid Medical Bills Was Not a Prerequisite to Prevailing on the Bad Faith Claim in Connection With Initial Denials for Mary’s Hysterectomy As an initial matter, United Wisconsin argues that because the jury found in United Wisconsin’s favor on the LeRettes’ breach of contract cause of action, its verdict in favor of Mary on the bad faith claim cannot stand. | 2 | 2003–2005 |
Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1992Co., 145 Ariz. 1 , 699 P.2d 376 (Ariz. App. 1984), we instead follow the proposition in the Anderson line of cases that in a bad faith claim, emotional distress must be severe in order to justify recovery. 1992Co., 145 Ariz. 1 , 699 P.2d 376 (Ariz. App. 1984), we instead follow the proposition in the Anderson line of cases that in a bad faith claim, emotional distress must be severe in order to justify recovery. | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance
green
2 sentences1992Co., 9 Cal. 3d 566 , 510 P.2d 1032 , 108 Cal. Rptr. 480 (1973), and Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. 1992Co., 9 Cal. 3d 566 , 510 P.2d 1032 , 108 Cal. Rptr. 480 (1973), and Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Millard Gutter Co. v. Farm Bureau Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2022Cite as 312 Neb. 629 of the amended complaint were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss, reasoning: Upon our de novo review, accepting the allegations in the amended complaint as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Millard Gutter, we determine that for the purposes of a motion to dismiss, Millard Gutter has sufficiently pled a bad faith claim under Nebraska law. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Arizona v. Youngblood
green
2 sentences2018Ed. 2d 215 (1963), rather than potentially exculpatory evidence, which is subject to a bad faith analysis pursuant to Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 , 109 S. Ct. 333 , 102 L. 2018Ed. 2d 215 (1963), rather than potentially exculpatory evidence, which is subject to a bad faith analysis pursuant to Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 , 109 S. Ct. 333 , 102 L. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Slade
green
1 sentence2005United Wisconsin refers us to State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Slade, 747 So. 2d 293 (Ala. 1999) (in order to recover on claim of bad faith failure to investigate, insured must show that insurer breached contract), and Liberty Nat. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Williams v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences2005Co., 255 Neb. 224 , 583 N.W.2d 320 (1998), and in Williams v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 266 Neb. 794 , 669 N.W.2d 455 (2003). 2005Co., 255 Neb. 224 , 583 N.W.2d 320 (1998), and in Williams v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 266 Neb. 794 , 669 N.W.2d 455 (2003). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.