privilege claim (Rhode Island) · Go Syfert
← Rhode Island issues

privilege claim in Rhode Island

6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Von Bulowgreen
ri · 1984 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See Callahan, 641 A.2d at 61 (recognizing that “[o]nly [the attorney’s] financial interests [were] at stake”); cf. von Bulow, 475 A.2d at 1007 (“Consistent with these principles of fairness, it has been held that the attorney-client privilege properly serves as a shield and not as an offensive tool of litigation.”).

11
Callahan v. Nystedtgreen
ri · 1994 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017See Callahan, 641 A.2d at 61 (recognizing that “[o]nly [the attorney’s] financial interests [were] at stake”); cf. von Bulow, 475 A.2d at 1007 (“Consistent with these principles of fairness, it has been held that the attorney-client privilege properly serves as a shield and not as an offensive tool of litigation.”).

11
Kalian v. People Acting Through Community Effort, Inc.green
ri · 1979 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996V Invasion of Privacy An action for invasion of privacy was not maintainable at common law, Kalian v. PACE, 122 R.I. 429, 431 , 408 A.2d 608, 609 (1979), and the only available mechanism by which such an action may be maintained is G.L.1956 § 9-1-28.1.

1996V Invasion of Privacy An action for invasion of privacy was not maintainable at common law, Kalian v. PACE, 122 R.I. 429, 431 , 408 A.2d 608, 609 (1979), and the only available mechanism by which such an action may be maintained is G.L.1956 § 9-1-28.1.

11
Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appelleegreen
ca2 · 1973 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996The Howell decision says as much: "We do not mean to suggest * * * that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. "* * * "Courts have recognized that news-gathering methods may be tortious * * * and, to the extent that a journalist engages in such atrocious, indecent and utterly despicable conduct as to meet the rigorous requirements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, recovery may be available." Id., 596 N.Y.S.2d at 356 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 (citing Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986, 995 (2d Cir.1973)).

1996The Howell decision says as much: “We do not mean to suggest * * * that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. « $ ‡ ‡ “Courts have recognized that news-gathering methods may be tortious * * * and, to the extent that a journalist engages in such atrocious, indecent and utterly despicable conduct as to meet the rigorous requirements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, recovery may be available.” Id., 596 N.Y.S.2d at 356 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 (citing Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986, 995 (2d Cir.1973)).

11
Walker v. Department of Motor Vehiclesgreen
calctapp · 1969 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc. green
flnd · 1994
1 sentence

2008The rational for the doctrine is that such critical self-evaluation fosters the compelling public interest in observance of the law." Reichold Chemicals , 157 F.R.D. at 524 .

12008–2008
Howell v. New York Post Co. green
ny · 1993
2 sentences

1996We do not mean to suggest, however, that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress." Howell, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 .

1996We do not mean to suggest, however, that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress." Howell, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 .

11996–1996
State Ex Rel. McGraw v. West Virginia Judicial Review Board green
wva · 1980
2 sentences

1996Chief Judge Arrigan contends that “[n]ew privileges that have evolved have been qualified rather than absolute, with courts looking at factors such as the type of case, the probative value of the evidence as to which the privilege claim is asserted, the availability of other evidence, and the societal interests at stake.” Relying on State v. West Virginia Judicial Review Board, 264 S.E.2d 168 (W.Va.1980), Chief Judge Arrigan argues that the court refused to grant absolute immunity to the members of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and held that the protective order prohibiting any discovery inv

1996The court, however, stated that “[ejertainly the Judicial Review Board can narrow the scope of the deposition to protect against undue harassment * * * .” Id.

11996–1996
State v. Stevens green
me · 1969
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Blydenburg v. David green
mo · 1967
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Bean v. Strelecki green
njsuperctappdiv · 1968
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
State v. Trotter neutral
connappct · 1967
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Mauldin v. State green
md · 1965
2 sentences

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
State v. Bock green
idaho · 1958
2 sentences

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Lee v. State green
kan · 1961
2 sentences

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court green
me · 1969
1 sentence

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles green
neb · 1961
2 sentences

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J.

11972–1972
Walker v. Sauvinet green
· 1876
1 sentence

1905In its federal aspects, the question thus raised is resolved adversely to the plaintiff by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Maxwell v. Dow (1899), 176 U. S. 581 -594, where the court says: “In Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90 , it was held that a trial by jury in suits at common law in the State courts was not a privilege or immunity belonging to a person as a citizen of the United States, and protected, therefore, by the Fourteenth Amendment.

11905–1905
Maxwell v. Dow green
scotus · 1900
1 sentence

1905In its federal aspects, the question thus raised is resolved adversely to the plaintiff by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Maxwell v. Dow (1899), 176 U. S. 581 -594, where the court says: “In Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90 , it was held that a trial by jury in suits at common law in the State courts was not a privilege or immunity belonging to a person as a citizen of the United States, and protected, therefore, by the Fourteenth Amendment.

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

CA 60 (1902–2026) TX 56 (1960–2026) NY 47 (1889–2025) WA 36 (1920–2025) PA 31 (1891–2025) OH 31 (1964–2024) FL 30 (1931–2025) LA 28 (1850–2021) OR 26 (1896–2024) IN 26 (1885–2017) IL 24 (1904–2026) MI 20 (1886–2026) MD 18 (1911–2024) NJ 17 (1960–2020) KY 15 (1929–2025) AZ 14 (1976–2026) VA 14 (1926–2023) CT 13 (1937–2011) NH 12 (1889–2018) MO 11 (1916–2014) WV 11 (1947–2022) WI 11 (1899–2026) IA 11 (1969–2024) CO 10 (1970–2026) AK 10 (1964–2017) MS 10 (1984–2023) NM 9 (1956–2015) MN 9 (1889–2016) OK 9 (1913–2019) GA 9 (1940–2025) ME 8 (1913–2014) MA 8 (1977–2018) AR 8 (1923–2003) AL 8 (1909–2018) DE 7 (1963–2020) RI 6 (1905–2017) KS 6 (1969–2017) NC 6 (1921–2019) DC 5 (1984–2025) TN 5 (1936–2019) UT 4 (1943–2020) HI 3 (1979–2014) NV 3 (1997–2020) ND 3 (1980–1994) SD 2 (1984–2001) NE 2 (1991–2007) VT 2 (1988–2002) ID 2 (1978–2014) MT 2 (1931–1969)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check