6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Von Bulowgreen1 sentence2017See Callahan, 641 A.2d at 61 (recognizing that “[o]nly [the attorney’s] financial interests [were] at stake”); cf. von Bulow, 475 A.2d at 1007 (“Consistent with these principles of fairness, it has been held that the attorney-client privilege properly serves as a shield and not as an offensive tool of litigation.”). | 1 | 1 |
Callahan v. Nystedtgreen1 sentence2017See Callahan, 641 A.2d at 61 (recognizing that “[o]nly [the attorney’s] financial interests [were] at stake”); cf. von Bulow, 475 A.2d at 1007 (“Consistent with these principles of fairness, it has been held that the attorney-client privilege properly serves as a shield and not as an offensive tool of litigation.”). | 1 | 1 |
Kalian v. People Acting Through Community Effort, Inc.green2 sentences1996V Invasion of Privacy An action for invasion of privacy was not maintainable at common law, Kalian v. PACE, 122 R.I. 429, 431 , 408 A.2d 608, 609 (1979), and the only available mechanism by which such an action may be maintained is G.L.1956 § 9-1-28.1. 1996V Invasion of Privacy An action for invasion of privacy was not maintainable at common law, Kalian v. PACE, 122 R.I. 429, 431 , 408 A.2d 608, 609 (1979), and the only available mechanism by which such an action may be maintained is G.L.1956 § 9-1-28.1. | 1 | 1 |
Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appelleegreen2 sentences1996The Howell decision says as much: "We do not mean to suggest * * * that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. "* * * "Courts have recognized that news-gathering methods may be tortious * * * and, to the extent that a journalist engages in such atrocious, indecent and utterly despicable conduct as to meet the rigorous requirements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, recovery may be available." Id., 596 N.Y.S.2d at 356 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 (citing Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986, 995 (2d Cir.1973)). 1996The Howell decision says as much: “We do not mean to suggest * * * that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. « $ ‡ ‡ “Courts have recognized that news-gathering methods may be tortious * * * and, to the extent that a journalist engages in such atrocious, indecent and utterly despicable conduct as to meet the rigorous requirements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, recovery may be available.” Id., 596 N.Y.S.2d at 356 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 (citing Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986, 995 (2d Cir.1973)). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Department of Motor Vehiclesgreen1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008The rational for the doctrine is that such critical self-evaluation fosters the compelling public interest in observance of the law." Reichold Chemicals , 157 F.R.D. at 524 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Howell v. New York Post Co.
green
2 sentences1996We do not mean to suggest, however, that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress." Howell, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 . 1996We do not mean to suggest, however, that a plaintiff could never defeat the privilege and state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress." Howell, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 612 N.E.2d at 705 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State Ex Rel. McGraw v. West Virginia Judicial Review Board
green
2 sentences1996Chief Judge Arrigan contends that “[n]ew privileges that have evolved have been qualified rather than absolute, with courts looking at factors such as the type of case, the probative value of the evidence as to which the privilege claim is asserted, the availability of other evidence, and the societal interests at stake.” Relying on State v. West Virginia Judicial Review Board, 264 S.E.2d 168 (W.Va.1980), Chief Judge Arrigan argues that the court refused to grant absolute immunity to the members of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and held that the protective order prohibiting any discovery inv 1996The court, however, stated that “[ejertainly the Judicial Review Board can narrow the scope of the deposition to protect against undue harassment * * * .” Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Stevens
green
1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Blydenburg v. David
green
1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Bean v. Strelecki
green
1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Trotter
neutral
1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Mauldin v. State
green
2 sentences1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. 1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Bock
green
2 sentences1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. 1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Lee v. State
green
2 sentences1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. 1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court
green
1 sentence1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles
green
2 sentences1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. 1972See, e.g., Walker v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 274 Cal.App.2d 793 , 79 Cal. Rptr.433 (1969); State v. Trotter, 4 Conn. Cir. 185, 230 A.2d 618 (1967); State v. Bock, 80 Idaho 296 , 328 P.2d 1065 (1958); Lee v. State, 187 Kan. 566 , 358 P.2d 765 (1961); State v. Stevens, 252 A.2d 58 (Me. 1969); Opinion of the Justices, 255 A.2d 643 (Me. 1969); Mauldin v. State, 239 Md. 592 , 212 A.2d 502 (1965); Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284 (Mo. 1967); Prucha v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 172 Neb. 415, 110 N.W.2d 75 (1961); Bean v. Strelecki, 101 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Walker v. Sauvinet
green
1 sentence1905In its federal aspects, the question thus raised is resolved adversely to the plaintiff by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Maxwell v. Dow (1899), 176 U. S. 581 -594, where the court says: “In Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90 , it was held that a trial by jury in suits at common law in the State courts was not a privilege or immunity belonging to a person as a citizen of the United States, and protected, therefore, by the Fourteenth Amendment. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Maxwell v. Dow
green
1 sentence1905In its federal aspects, the question thus raised is resolved adversely to the plaintiff by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Maxwell v. Dow (1899), 176 U. S. 581 -594, where the court says: “In Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90 , it was held that a trial by jury in suits at common law in the State courts was not a privilege or immunity belonging to a person as a citizen of the United States, and protected, therefore, by the Fourteenth Amendment. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.