Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lillygreen2 sentences2017Cf. State v. Lilly, 717 N.E.2d 322, 327 (Ohio 1999) (“A majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed th[e] issue have found that the entry of an estranged spouse upon the property of the other spouse constitutes an (continued...) -39- 7196 does not enjoy such a privilege or whose privilege has terminated — equivalent to an “estranged spouse” — appropriately can be considered a “domestic living partner.” Every case turns on its own facts, but we question whether that designation can be applied if the unwelcome “partner” has no privilege to enter. 2017Cf. State v. Lilly, 717 N.E.2d 322, 327 (Ohio 1999) (“A majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed th[e] issue have found that the entry of an estranged spouse upon the property of the other spouse constitutes an (continued...) -39- 7196 does not enjoy such a privilege or whose privilege has terminated — equivalent to an “estranged spouse” — appropriately can be considered a “domestic living partner.” Every case turns on its own facts, but we question whether that designation can be applied if the unwelcome “partner” has no privilege to enter. | 2 | 2 |
Billy Joe Battie v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F. Supp. 1118, 1123-24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). 1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F.Supp. 1118 , 1123—24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). | 2 | 2 |
Theard v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license 1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license | 2 | 2 |
Vanderbilt v. Lynaughgreen2 sentences1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F. Supp. 1118, 1123-24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). 1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F.Supp. 1118 , 1123—24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). | 1 | 2 |
United Services Automobile Association v. Werleygreen1 sentence1995“Once a litigant has presented prima facie evidence of the perpetration of a fraud or crime in the attorney-client relationship, the other party may not then claim the privilege as a bar to the discovery of relevant communications _” 10 Werley, 526 P.2d at 32-33 (footnotes omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. City of Fairbanksgreen1 sentence1993Constitutional interpretation follows the “rule that the intent underlying ... constitutional language should first be gathered from the plain meaning of the language itself.” Baker v. City of Fairbanks, 471 P.2d 386, 397 (Alaska 1970). | 1 | 1 |
Miranda v. Arizonagreen2 sentences1975A matter will incriminate a person within the meaning of this subdivision if it constitutes, or forms an essential part of, or taken in connection with other matters disclosed, is a basis for a reasonable inference of such a violation of the laws of this state as to subject him to liability to punishment therefor, unless he has become for any reason permanently immune from punishment for such violation. [11] AS 11.15.134 provides in part: Lewd or lascivious acts toward children. (a) A person who commits a lewed or lascivious act, including an act constituting another crime, upon or with the bo 1975A matter will incriminate a person within the meaning of this subdivision if it constitutes, or forms an essential part of, or taken in connection with other matters disclosed, is a basis for a reasonable inference of such a violation of the laws of this state as to subject him to liability to punishment therefor, unless he has become for any reason permanently immune from punishment for such violation. [11] AS 11.15.134 provides in part: Lewd or lascivious acts toward children. (a) A person who commits a lewed or lascivious act, including an act constituting another crime, upon or with the bo | 1 | 1 |
Glasgow v. Stategreen1 sentence1975A matter will incriminate a person within the meaning of this subdivision if it constitutes, or forms an essential part of, or taken in connection with other matters disclosed, is a basis for a reasonable inference of such a violation of the laws of this state as to subject him to liability to punishment therefor, unless he has become for any reason permanently immune from punishment for such violation. [11] AS 11.15.134 provides in part: Lewd or lascivious acts toward children. (a) A person who commits a lewed or lascivious act, including an act constituting another crime, upon or with the bo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jim Vanderbilt v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
green
2 sentences1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F. Supp. 1118, 1123-24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). 1994Cf. Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692, 700-01 (5th Cir.1981); Vanderbilt v. Lynaugh, 683 F.Supp. 1118 , 1123—24 (E.D.Texas 1988), vacated in part on other grounds, Vanderbilt v. Collins, 994 F.2d 189 (5th Cir.1993). | 2 | 1994–1994 |
In Re Lockwood
green
2 sentences1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license 1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license | 2 | 1964–1966 |
Bradwell v. State
green
2 sentences1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license 1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license | 2 | 1964–1966 |
Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM
green
2 sentences1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license 1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license | 2 | 1964–1966 |
Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.
green
2 sentences1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license 1966License to practice law, the continuation of such license, regulation of the practice and the procedure for disbarment and discipline are all matters that are within the province of an individual state. * * * * * * In In re Lockwood, Petitioner, 154 U.S. 116 , at page 117, 14 S.Ct. 1082 at page 1083, 38 L.Ed. 929 , the court said: `In Bradwell v. The State, 16 Wall. 130 ( 83 U.S. 130 ), [ 21 L.Ed. 442 ,] it was held that the right to practice law in the state courts was not a privilege or immunity of a citizen of the United States; that the right to control and regulate the granting of license | 2 | 1964–1966 |
United States v. L. Shyrl Brown
green
2 sentences1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all." United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n. 1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. 1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all.” United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n.1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Yono v. Columbus Landings, Ltd.
green
2 sentences1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all." United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n. 1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. 1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all.” United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n.1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Brown v. United States
green
2 sentences1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all." United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n. 1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. 1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all.” United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n.1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Tedder v. Peters
green
2 sentences1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all." United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n. 1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. 1981The law is now established that failure to provide any information is tantamount to no return at all.” United States v. Brown, 600 F.2d 248 , 251 & n.1 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed.2d 172 (1979) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.