Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences2009Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 934 (1995). 2003Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 930 , 115 S. Ct. 1914, 1916 , 131 L. | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Patrick C. Remigio, A/K/A Joe Cuervogreen1 sentence2009See United States v. Williams, 351 F.2d 475, 477 (6th Cir. 1962); see also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-33 (10th Cir. 1985) (reaching same conclusion; cites to Williams and cases from five other federal circuits in support of conclusion). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Wilbert Williamsgreen1 sentence2009See United States v. Williams, 351 F.2d 475, 477 (6th Cir. 1962); see also United States v. Remigio, 767 F.2d 730, 732-33 (10th Cir. 1985) (reaching same conclusion; cites to Williams and cases from five other federal circuits in support of conclusion). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carufelgreen1 sentence2003“Absent exigent circumstances, officers must ‘wait a reasonable period of time before [they] may break and enter into the premises to be searched.” Lee, 836 S.W.2d at 128 (footnote omitted) (quoting State v. Carufel, 314 A.2d 144, 146 (R.I. 1974)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Leegreen1 sentence2003“Absent exigent circumstances, officers must ‘wait a reasonable period of time before [they] may break and enter into the premises to be searched.” Lee, 836 S.W.2d at 128 (footnote omitted) (quoting State v. Carufel, 314 A.2d 144, 146 (R.I. 1974)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richards v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences2010In Richards v. Wisconsin, ___U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 1416 (1997); the Court held that the reasonableness of each “no knock” entry for the purpose of executing a search warrant must be judged under the particular circumstances of each case. 1998Richa rds v. W iscon sin, ___ U.S . ___, 117 S.Ct. 1416 , 142 0 (1997); Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995). | 2 | 1998–2010 |
State v. Henning
green
2 sentences2005Id. 2000Id. | 2 | 2000–2005 |
State v. Fletcher
green
2 sentences1998In State v. Fletcher, supra., this Court indicated that “sounds indicative of flight or destruction of evidence -- running, scuffling, or toilet flushing” could excuse compliance with the knock and announce rule. 789 S.W. 2d at 566 . 1998In State v. Fletcher, supra., this Court indicated that “sounds indicative of flight or destruction of evidence -- running, scuffling, or toilet flushing” could excuse compliance with the knock and announce rule. 789 S.W. 2d at 566 . | 2 | 1998–2003 |
State v. Gabbard
green
1 sentence2010The State cites the case of State v. Gabbard, 877 P.2d 1217 (Or. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
United States v. Gilbert Moreno
green
1 sentence2000The purpose of the knock and announce rule is described in United States v. Moreno, 701 F. 2d 815 (9th Cir. 1983). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.