Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1989–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1995The knock and announce rule *326 “should be evaluated in the light of modern technology and the nature of illegal drug traffic in which small, easily disposable quantities of drugs can yield large profits.” Johnson, 213 Va. at 105 , 189 S.E.2d at 680 . 1995The knock and announce rule *326 “should be evaluated in the light of modern technology and the nature of illegal drug traffic in which small, easily disposable quantities of drugs can yield large profits.” Johnson, 213 Va. at 105 , 189 S.E.2d at 680 . | 2 | 5 |
Richards v. Wisconsingreen2 sentences2000See Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385 , 117 S.Ct. 1416 , 137 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997). 1999In Richards, the United States Supreme Court rejected a "blanket exception" to the knock and announce requirement in cases where drugs are the target of the search, stating "it is the duty of a court confronted with the question to determine whether the facts and circumstances of the particular entry justified dispensing with the knock-and-announce requirement." Richards, 520 U.S. at 394 . | 1 | 2 |
Hudson v. Michigangreen1 sentence2007In Perry v. Commonwealth, 49 Va. App. 65 , 636 S.E.2d 891 (2006), we explicitly held that “the remedy for [a violation of the knock and announce rule] is not the suppression of the evidence recovered from appellant’s residence.” Perry, 49 Va. App. at 67 , 636 S.E.2d at 893 (citing Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159, 2165 (2006)). | 1 | 1 |
Gladden v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2001Gladden v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 595, 599 (1991), citing Johnson v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 102, 104 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Immanuel Cyprus Perry v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences2007In Perry v. Commonwealth, 49 Va. App. 65 , 636 S.E.2d 891 (2006), we explicitly held that “the remedy for [a violation of the knock and announce rule] is not the suppression of the evidence recovered from appellant’s residence.” Perry, 49 Va. App. at 67 , 636 S.E.2d at 893 (citing Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159, 2165 (2006)). 2007In Perry v. Commonwealth, 49 Va. App. 65 , 636 S.E.2d 891 (2006), we explicitly held that “the remedy for [a violation of the knock and announce rule] is not the suppression of the evidence recovered from appellant’s residence.” Perry, 49 Va. App. at 67 , 636 S.E.2d at 893 (citing Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159, 2165 (2006)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Heaton v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1989In Heaton, supra, the Court refused to permit an exception to the knock and announce rule where the disposable nature of the contraband was the only exigent circumstance. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.