5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bailey v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2022However, we emphasize that a defendant’s criminal 25 194 S.W.3d 296, 301 (Ky. 2006). 26 Id. 27 551 F.3d 485, 514 (6th Cir. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2022However, we emphasize that a defendant’s criminal 25 194 S.W.3d 296, 301 (Ky. 2006). 26 Id. 27 551 F.3d 485, 514 (6th Cir. 2009). 2022However, we emphasize that a defendant’s criminal 25 194 S.W.3d 296, 301 (Ky. 2006). 26 Id. 27 551 F.3d 485, 514 (6th Cir. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Downing v. Downinggreen1 sentence2008In Downing v. Downing, 45 S.W.3d 449, 454 (Ky.App.2001), a panel of this Court discussed the standard of review for appellate courts in child support matters: Kentucky trial courts have been given broad discretion in considering a parent’s assets and setting correspondingly appropriate child support_ However, a trial court’s discretion is not unlimited. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Genesis Insurance v. City of Council Bluffs
green
1 sentence2023In that case, the Court discussed the claim for civil rights violations as “in the nature of malicious prosecution.” Id. at 810 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Birch v. Jefferson County Court
green
2 sentences2011In Birch v. Jefferson County Court, 244 Ky. 425 , 51 S.W.2d 258 , it was written that the will must be signed by the testator, or acknowledged by him, in the presence of two witnesses who must subscribe their names in the presence of testator, but the statute does not require that the will be both signed and acknowledged by the testator in the presence of the two witnesses. 2011In Birch v. Jefferson County Court, 244 Ky. 425 , 51 S.W.2d 258 , it was written that the will must be signed by the testator, or acknowledged by him, in the presence of two witnesses who must subscribe their names in the presence of testator, but the statute does not require that the will be both signed and acknowledged by the testator in the presence of the two witnesses. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Rybolt v. Futrell
green
2 sentences2011In Rybolt v. Futrell, 296 Ky. 158, 176 S.W.2d 269 (1943), the court discussed the doctrine of substantial compliance as applies to KRS 394.040, stating that a literal compliance with this section is not necessary and that a substantial compliance therewith will suffice provided there is no violation of the express language of the statute. 2011In Rybolt v. Futrell, 296 Ky. 158, 176 S.W.2d 269 (1943), the court discussed the doctrine of substantial compliance as applies to KRS 394.040, stating that a literal compliance with this section is not necessary and that a substantial compliance therewith will suffice provided there is no violation of the express language of the statute. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Deutsch v. Shein
red
2 sentences1992In Deutsch v. Shein, Ky., 597 S.W.2d 141 (1980), this Court discussed the standard by which we determine whether retrial of the whole case or damages alone is required. 1992In Deutsch v. Shein, Ky., 597 S.W.2d 141 (1980), this Court discussed the standard by which we determine whether retrial of the whole case or damages alone is required. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.