discussed standard in Wisconsin

2002In 1987, this court discussed the claim of bad faith in Warmka v. Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance, 136 Wis. 2d 31 , 400 N.W.2d 923 (1987).

2002In 1987, this court discussed the claim of bad faith in Warmka v. Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance, 136 Wis. 2d 31 , 400 N.W.2d 923 (1987).

1999Id., 30 Wis. 2d at 212-13 , 140 N.W.2d at 195 .

1999Id., 30 Wis. 2d at 212-13 , 140 N.W.2d at 195 .

1991Co., 96 Wis. 2d 314, 330-34 , 219 N.W.2d 825 (1980) (where this court discussed the doctrine of joint and several liability).

1989Co., 87 Wis. 2d 723 , 275 N.W.2d 660 (1979), this court discussed the test that is applied in analyzing such motions: For the purpose of testing whether a claim has been stated pursuant to a motion to dismiss under sec. 802.06(2) (f), Stats., the facts pleaded must be taken *463 as admitted.

1989Co., 87 Wis. 2d 723 , 275 N.W.2d 660 (1979), this court discussed the test that is applied in analyzing such motions: For the purpose of testing whether a claim has been stated pursuant to a motion to dismiss under sec. 802.06(2) (f), Stats., the facts pleaded must be taken *463 as admitted.

1985In State v. McConnohie, 113 Wis. 2d 362 , 334 N.W.2d 903 (1983), this court discussed the standard of review appropriate for assessing the correctness of the court of appeals’ grant of a new trial under sec. 752.35, Stats.

1985In State v. McConnohie, 113 Wis. 2d 362 , 334 N.W.2d 903 (1983), this court discussed the standard of review appropriate for assessing the correctness of the court of appeals’ grant of a new trial under sec. 752.35, Stats.

1981In Ferguson v. Kenosha, 5 Wis. 2d 556, 568 , 93 N.W.2d 460 (1958), this court stated that, “An allegation or denial based upon information and belief with respect to any matter of public record is a nullity.” In the early case of Goodell v. Blumer, 41 Wis. 436, 444 (1877), the court discussed this rule, saying that, “The principle of these decisions is, that a party cannot plead ignorance of a public record to which he has access, and which affords him all the means of information necessary to obtain positive knowledge of the fact.” See also, Elmore v. Hill, 46 Wis. 618 , 1 N.W. 235 (1879).

1981In Ferguson v. Kenosha, 5 Wis. 2d 556, 568 , 93 N.W.2d 460 (1958), this court stated that, “An allegation or denial based upon information and belief with respect to any matter of public record is a nullity.” In the early case of Goodell v. Blumer, 41 Wis. 436, 444 (1877), the court discussed this rule, saying that, “The principle of these decisions is, that a party cannot plead ignorance of a public record to which he has access, and which affords him all the means of information necessary to obtain positive knowledge of the fact.” See also, Elmore v. Hill, 46 Wis. 618 , 1 N.W. 235 (1879).

1981In Ferguson v. Kenosha, 5 Wis. 2d 556, 568 , 93 N.W.2d 460 (1958), this court stated that, “An allegation or denial based upon information and belief with respect to any matter of public record is a nullity.” In the early case of Goodell v. Blumer, 41 Wis. 436, 444 (1877), the court discussed this rule, saying that, “The principle of these decisions is, that a party cannot plead ignorance of a public record to which he has access, and which affords him all the means of information necessary to obtain positive knowledge of the fact.” See also, Elmore v. Hill, 46 Wis. 618 , 1 N.W. 235 (1879).

1980Brokers’ Board, 3 Wis.2d 249, 253 , 88 N.W.2d 352 , 89 N.W.2d 825 (1958), this court discussed the test that qualifies a determination as a “decision” entitled to judicial review.

1980Brokers’ Board, 3 Wis.2d 249, 253 , 88 N.W.2d 353 , 89 N.W.2d 825 (1958), this court discussed the test that qualifies a determination as a ‘decision’ entitled to judicial review.

1979In Unified School District No. 1 of Racine County v. WERC, 81 Wis.2d 89 , 259 N.W.2d 724 (1977) the court discussed the standard of review applicable to WERC decisions dealing with mandatory bargaining and stated: “Because the case raised ‘very nearly questions of first impression,’ 2 this court held that it was ‘not bound’ by the Commission’s interpretation of the statute, although the Commission’s decision would have ‘great bearing’ on the court’s decision, and would be accorded ‘due weight.’ Beloit Education Asso., supra, at 68.

1979In Unified School District No. 1 of Racine County v. WERC, 81 Wis.2d 89 , 259 N.W.2d 724 (1977) the court discussed the standard of review applicable to WERC decisions dealing with mandatory bargaining and stated: “Because the case raised ‘very nearly questions of first impression,’ 2 this court held that it was ‘not bound’ by the Commission’s interpretation of the statute, although the Commission’s decision would have ‘great bearing’ on the court’s decision, and would be accorded ‘due weight.’ Beloit Education Asso., supra, at 68.

1975In Copeland v. Larson (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 337 , 174 N. W. 2d 745 , this court discussed the standard for determining the status of an invitee to whom is owed the duty of ordinary care.

1975In Copeland v. Larson (1970), 46 Wis. 2d 337 , 174 N. W. 2d 745 , this court discussed the standard for determining the status of an invitee to whom is owed the duty of ordinary care.

1970The last case in which this court discussed the rule of reason was Town of Menasha v. City of Menasha (1969), 42 Wis. 2d 719 , 168 N. W. 2d 161 , where this court held the trial court’s findings that the annexation did not violate the rule of reason was “not contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Town of Menasha v. City of Menasha, supra, page 739.

1970The last case in which this court discussed the rule of reason was Town of Menasha v. City of Menasha (1969), 42 Wis. 2d 719 , 168 N. W. 2d 161 , where this court held the trial court’s findings that the annexation did not violate the rule of reason was “not contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Town of Menasha v. City of Menasha, supra, page 739.