Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Leegreen1 sentence1979Council, 68 N.J. 604, 621 (1975), where the court discussed factors to be considered in calculating a reasonable return under a rent control ordinance and said: "We expect that as cases are litigated and records of expert testimony are fully developed, more information will become available to refine and, if need be, alter these guidelines." This prediction was quickly realized in litigation challenging Fort Lee's rent leveling ordinance whose stormy history is reviewed in Helmsley v. Fort Lee, 78 N.J. 200, 204-209 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
Troy Hills Vil. v. Tp. Council Tp. Parsippany-Troy Hillsgreen1 sentence1979Council, 68 N.J. 604, 621 (1975), where the court discussed factors to be considered in calculating a reasonable return under a rent control ordinance and said: "We expect that as cases are litigated and records of expert testimony are fully developed, more information will become available to refine and, if need be, alter these guidelines." This prediction was quickly realized in litigation challenging Fort Lee's rent leveling ordinance whose stormy history is reviewed in Helmsley v. Fort Lee, 78 N.J. 200, 204-209 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
D'Annunzio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences2015In D’Annunzio, supra, 192 N.J. at 119 , 927 A.2d 113 , the Court discussed the test for establishing an employee relationship in the context of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. 2015In D’Annunzio, supra, 192 N.J. at 119 , 927 A.2d 113 , the Court discussed the test for establishing an employee relationship in the context of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Spina v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund Commission
green
2 sentences2012This Court discussed that principle in Spina v. Consolidated Police and Firemen’s Pension Fund Commission, 41 N.J. 391 , 197 A.2d 169 (1964). 2012This Court discussed that principle in Spina v. Consolidated Police and Firemen’s Pension Fund Commission, 41 N.J. 391 , 197 A.2d 169 (1964). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. MORETTI
green
2 sentences2007Because the case had been argued "as though, for purposes of the defense of impossibility, a conspiracy charge is the same as a charge of attempting to commit a crime," id. at 187 , 244 A. 2d 499 , the Court discussed the defense of impossibility to a charge of attempted abortion. 2007Id. at 187-88 , 244 A. 2d 499 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Meisch
neutral
1 sentence2007Because the case had been argued "as though, for purposes of the defense of impossibility, a conspiracy charge is the same as a charge of attempting to commit a crime," id. at 187 , 244 A. 2d 499 , the Court discussed the defense of impossibility to a charge of attempted abortion. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Sanzari v. Rosenfeld
green
1 sentence1980In Sanzari v. Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128 (1961), the court discussed the requirement of establishing an applicable standard of conduct in cases where a jury is not competent to supply the standard by which to measure a defendant's conduct, as here. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
New Jersey School & Church Furniture Co. v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1935At page 571 the court said: *235 “In Furniture Co. v. Board of Education, 29 Vr. 646 (at p. 652), Mr. Justice Garrison, speaking for this court said: “The question of reasonable time is generally one of fact for the jury, and is always so when it rests upon conflicting inferences as to the mutual effect of the conduct of the parties to the transaction.’ “Subsequently, in 1904, the present Chancellor, then Mr. Justice Pitney, said: Tn this, as in all cases where questions of reasonable time, opportunity or the like are at issue, the determination of what is reasonable, where the facts are in di | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.