12 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicuttgreen2 sentences1991Our function was recently expressed in Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257 , 715 P.2d 927 (1986): In Local U94 of the International Association of Firefighters v. City of Coeur d Aleñe, 99 Idaho 630 , 586 P.2d 1346 (1978), this Court discussed the test for determining substantial evidence for the purposes of judicial review of an administrative agency’s action. 1991Our function was recently expressed in Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257 , 715 P.2d 927 (1986): In Local U94 of the International Association of Firefighters v. City of Coeur d Aleñe, 99 Idaho 630 , 586 P.2d 1346 (1978), this Court discussed the test for determining substantial evidence for the purposes of judicial review of an administrative agency’s action. | 1 | 3 |
INTERMOUNTAIN BUS. FORMS v. Shepard Bus. F. Co.green2 sentences2013Forms Co., 96 Idaho 538 , 531 P.2d 1183 (1975), this Court discussed the standard we employ when reviewing a district court’s decision on a motion to dismiss in which all evidence has been submitted by way of affidavit. 2013Forms Co., 96 Idaho 538 , 531 P.2d 1183 (1975), this Court discussed the standard we employ when reviewing a district court’s decision on a motion to dismiss in which all evidence has been submitted by way of affidavit. | 1 | 2 |
Hoffman v. Simplot Aviation, Inc.green2 sentences2003See Hoffman v. Simplot Aviation, 97 Idaho 32 , 539 P.2d 584 (1975). 2003See Hoffman v. Simplot Aviation, 97 Idaho 32 , 539 P.2d 584 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Udy v. Custer Countygreen2 sentences2003In Udy v. Custer County, 136 Idaho 386, 389 , 34 P.3d 1069, 1072 (2001), this Court discussed the requirement of a duty: No liability arises from the law of torts unless the defendant owes a duty to the plaintiff. 2003In Udy v. Custer County, 136 Idaho 386, 389 , 34 P.3d 1069, 1072 (2001), this Court discussed the requirement of a duty: No liability arises from the law of torts unless the defendant owes a duty to the plaintiff. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'Alene
green
2 sentences1991Our function was recently expressed in Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257 , 715 P.2d 927 (1986): In Local U94 of the International Association of Firefighters v. City of Coeur d Aleñe, 99 Idaho 630 , 586 P.2d 1346 (1978), this Court discussed the test for determining substantial evidence for the purposes of judicial review of an administrative agency’s action. 1991Our function was recently expressed in Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257 , 715 P.2d 927 (1986): In Local U94 of the International Association of Firefighters v. City of Coeur d Aleñe, 99 Idaho 630 , 586 P.2d 1346 (1978), this Court discussed the test for determining substantial evidence for the purposes of judicial review of an administrative agency’s action. | 4 | 1986–1991 |
State v. Peterson
green
2 sentences2014This Court discussed the standard to be applied when reviewing a plea agreement in State v. Peterson, 148 Idaho 593 , 226 P.3d 535 (2010): [Wjhen a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled. 2014This Court discussed the standard to be applied when reviewing a plea agreement in State v. Peterson, 148 Idaho 593 , 226 P.3d 535 (2010): [Wjhen a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Missouri v. McNeely
green
2 sentences2016Throughout the opinion, the Court discussed factors that “may affect whether the police can obtain a warrant in an expeditious way and therefore may establish an exigency that permits a warrantless search.” Id. at -, 133 S.Ct. at 1568 , 185 L.Ed.2d at 713-15 . 2016Throughout the opinion, the Court discussed factors that “may affect whether the police can obtain a warrant in an expeditious way and therefore may establish an exigency that permits a warrantless search.” Id. at -, 133 S.Ct. at 1568 , 185 L.Ed.2d at 713-15 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
KTVB, INC. v. Boise City
green
2 sentences1980In KTVB v. Boise City, 94 Idaho 279 , 486 P.2d 992 (1971), this Court discussed the doctrine of quasi estoppel at some length. 1980In KTVB v. Boise City, 94 Idaho 279 , 486 P.2d 992 (1971), this Court discussed the doctrine of quasi estoppel at some length. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fawcett v. Irby
green
2 sentences1972We doubt the continued validity of Domingo v. Phillips, supra, in view of the court’s holding in Fawcett v. Irby, supra. In Fawcett the court discussed an instruction given the jury on the defense of assumption of the risk and held the instruction erroneous in that it “did not require any showing that the assumption of the risk was the proximate cause of the injury * * The court said: “Thus the jury could have been influenced to find against plaintiffs because of acts or conduct on their part which did not proximately cause or contribute to the accident.” 92 Idaho 48, 53 , 436 P.2d 714, 719 . 1972We doubt the continued validity of Domingo v. Phillips, supra, in view of the court’s holding in Fawcett v. Irby, supra. In Fawcett the court discussed an instruction given the jury on the defense of assumption of the risk and held the instruction erroneous in that it “did not require any showing that the assumption of the risk was the proximate cause of the injury * * The court said: “Thus the jury could have been influenced to find against plaintiffs because of acts or conduct on their part which did not proximately cause or contribute to the accident.” 92 Idaho 48, 53 , 436 P.2d 714, 719 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.