Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1984–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Paul v. Ruiz v. Shell Oil Company, National Tank Companygreen2 sentences2012Factors generally accepted as appropriate considerations in this area were delineated in [Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir.1969) ], and [Gaudet v. Exxon Corp., 562 F.2d 351, 355, 357 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 913 , 98 S.Ct. 2253 , 56 L.Ed.2d 414 (1978) ]. 2012Factors generally accepted as appropriate considerations in this area were delineated in [Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir. 1969)], and [Gaudet v. Exxon David Clark as a borrowed employee. | 3 | 3 |
cluster 349266green1 sentence2012Factors generally accepted as appropriate considerations in this area were delineated in [Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir.1969) ], and [Gaudet v. Exxon Corp., 562 F.2d 351, 355, 357 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 913 , 98 S.Ct. 2253 , 56 L.Ed.2d 414 (1978) ]. | 1 | 1 |
Hogan v. County of Norfolkgreen1 sentence1990In Hogan, the court discussed the presumption favoring the assessment as follows: If the situs of the subject of the tax is within the jurisdiction of the assessing officer, he has jurisdiction to make the assessment, and the assessment is presumed to be legal and valid in all respects, until the contrary is affirmatively shown [emphasis in original]. id. at 736 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
County Board of Arlington County v. Stullgreen1 sentence1990Compare Arlington County v. Stull, 217 Va. 238 , fn. at 241 (1976) ("an assessment, including the County’s determination of situs, is entitled to the presumption of correctness"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin B. Glauser Dodge Co. v. Chrysler Corp.
green
1 sentence2012Factors generally accepted as appropriate considerations in this area were delineated in [Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir.1969) ], and [Gaudet v. Exxon Corp., 562 F.2d 351, 355, 357 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 913 , 98 S.Ct. 2253 , 56 L.Ed.2d 414 (1978) ]. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Fleschner v. Abrahamson
green
1 sentence2012Factors generally accepted as appropriate considerations in this area were delineated in [Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir.1969) ], and [Gaudet v. Exxon Corp., 562 F.2d 351, 355, 357 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 913 , 98 S.Ct. 2253 , 56 L.Ed.2d 414 (1978) ]. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
CLEAN SWEEP PROFESSIONAL v. Talley
green
2 sentences2012In Clean Sweep v. Talley, 267 Va. 210 , 591 S.E.2d 79 (2004), a pyramid case, the Court discussed the test in this fashion: The only exception to this exclusivity provision is provided in Code § 65.2-309(A) permitting an action to be maintained against an “other party” “To be an ‘other party’ a defendant must have been a stranger to the trade, occupation, or business in which the employee was engaged when he was injured.” 262 Va. at 525, 551 S.E.2d at 329. 2012In Clean Sweep v. Talley, 267 Va. 210 , 591 S.E.2d 79 (2004), a pyramid case, the Court discussed the test in this fashion: The only exception to this exclusivity provision is provided in Code § 65.2-309(A) permitting an action to be maintained against an “other party” “To be an ‘other party’ a defendant must have been a stranger to the trade, occupation, or business in which the employee was engaged when he was injured.” 262 Va. at 525, 551 S.E.2d at 329. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Mendenhall
green
2 sentences2012In Cochran , the Court discussed the test for determining whether a seizure has occurred that the United States Supreme Court formulated in United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 , 100 S.Ct. 1870 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980), and subsequently interpreted in Hodari D. 2012In Cochran , the Court discussed the test for determining whether a seizure has occurred that the United States Supreme Court formulated in United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 , 100 S.Ct. 1870 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980), and subsequently interpreted in Hodari D. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Leonard v. Arnold
green
2 sentences1999Citing Brosnahan , the Court discussed the doctrine of compensable consequences in Leonard v. Arnold, 218 Va. 210 , 237 S.E.2d 97 (1977). 1999Citing Brosnahan , the Court discussed the doctrine of compensable consequences in Leonard v. Arnold, 218 Va. 210 , 237 S.E.2d 97 (1977). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Dejarnette v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1984Defendant asserts that in Virginia the right-wrong test is stated as an alternative to the nature-of-the-act test under a proper definition of the insanity defense. *456 Defendant says that under the “first Virginia case involving insanity,” Dejarnette v. Commonwealth, 75 Va. 867 (1881), and under “more recent Virginia cases” dealing with the substance of the insanity defense, see Thompson v. Commonwealth, 193 Va. 704 , 70 S.E.2d 284 (1952), the Court discussed the principle from the perspective of instructions offered by the Commonwealth that the defendant was sane. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Thompson v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1984Defendant asserts that in Virginia the right-wrong test is stated as an alternative to the nature-of-the-act test under a proper definition of the insanity defense. *456 Defendant says that under the “first Virginia case involving insanity,” Dejarnette v. Commonwealth, 75 Va. 867 (1881), and under “more recent Virginia cases” dealing with the substance of the insanity defense, see Thompson v. Commonwealth, 193 Va. 704 , 70 S.E.2d 284 (1952), the Court discussed the principle from the perspective of instructions offered by the Commonwealth that the defendant was sane. 1984Defendant asserts that in Virginia the right-wrong test is stated as an alternative to the nature-of-the-act test under a proper definition of the insanity defense. *456 Defendant says that under the “first Virginia case involving insanity,” Dejarnette v. Commonwealth, 75 Va. 867 (1881), and under “more recent Virginia cases” dealing with the substance of the insanity defense, see Thompson v. Commonwealth, 193 Va. 704 , 70 S.E.2d 284 (1952), the Court discussed the principle from the perspective of instructions offered by the Commonwealth that the defendant was sane. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.