7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1933–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Albury v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461– 62 (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” where the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the evidence); John- son v. State, 312 Ga. 481 , 493–94 (2021) (seeing no abuse of discre- tion in the trial court’s “implicit conclusion” that evidence satisfied Rule 403 when the trial court admitted the evidence as intrinsic without making an oral or written ruling on Rule 403). 2026See, e.g., Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461– 62 (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” where the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the evidence); John- son v. State, 312 Ga. 481 , 493–94 (2021) (seeing no abuse of discre- tion in the trial court’s “implicit conclusion” that evidence satisfied Rule 403 when the trial court admitted the evidence as intrinsic without making an oral or written ruling on Rule 403). | 2 | 3 |
Entwisle v. the Stategreen2 sentences2026Relevant to Landy’s contention, OCGA § 24-4-404(b) in part provides: The prosecution in a criminal proceeding shall provide reasonable notice to the defense in advance of trial, unless pretrial notice is excused by the court upon good cause shown, of the general nature of any such 29 See Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461–62(3) ( 877 SE2d 548 ) (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” when the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the ev 2026Relevant to Landy’s contention, OCGA § 24-4-404(b) in part provides: The prosecution in a criminal proceeding shall provide reasonable notice to the defense in advance of trial, unless pretrial notice is excused by the court upon good cause shown, of the general nature of any such 29 See Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461–62(3) ( 877 SE2d 548 ) (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” when the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the ev | 1 | 1 |
State v. Evansgreen2 sentences2009According to this witness, “[t]here were several times in my remembrance that the court actually addressed that and even to the extent of — of advising Ms. Cook that it’s not a good idea to go forward without counsel.” Counsel, however, was unable to recall many specifics of the questioning, other than whether Cook qualified for appointed counsel, her level of education, and whether she was under the influence of any drugs and was “competent to make a decision at that time.” Beyond that, the witness could only state that he “would remember anything unusual” and that “there was nothing unusual 2009According to this witness, “[t]here were several times in my remembrance that the court actually addressed that and even to the extent of — of advising Ms. Cook that it’s not a good idea to go forward without counsel.” Counsel, however, was unable to recall many specifics of the questioning, other than whether Cook qualified for appointed counsel, her level of education, and whether she was under the influence of any drugs and was “competent to make a decision at that time.” Beyond that, the witness could only state that he “would remember anything unusual” and that “there was nothing unusual | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. State
green
2 sentences2026See, e.g., Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461– 62 (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” where the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the evidence); John- son v. State, 312 Ga. 481 , 493–94 (2021) (seeing no abuse of discre- tion in the trial court’s “implicit conclusion” that evidence satisfied Rule 403 when the trial court admitted the evidence as intrinsic without making an oral or written ruling on Rule 403). 2026See, e.g., Albury v. State, 314 Ga. 459 , 461– 62 (2022) (concluding that the trial court “implicitly conducted the proper analysis under Rule 403, even though it did not expressly reference that rule,” where the transcript showed that the parties and the court discussed the rule’s application to the evidence); John- son v. State, 312 Ga. 481 , 493–94 (2021) (seeing no abuse of discre- tion in the trial court’s “implicit conclusion” that evidence satisfied Rule 403 when the trial court admitted the evidence as intrinsic without making an oral or written ruling on Rule 403). | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Waldrip v. State
green
1 sentence2005Waldrip, supra, 267 Ga. at 743 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Prentice v. Twin City Wholesale Grocery
green
2 sentences1945This court discussed that rule in Pacific Employers’ Insurance Co. v. Chavez, supra. If such is the law, then certainly, in such a case as this, where there was no prohibition against riding on the engines, it was frequently done by the employees, and it occurred on premises which were used in part for the conduct of the employer’s business . . there should be little doubt that the injury is compensable.” For a view of Minnesota’s change in position, see Prentice v. Twin City Wholesale Grocery, 202 Minn. 455 ( 278 N. W. 895 ). 1945This court discussed that rule in Pacific Employers’ Insurance Co. v. Chavez, supra. If such is the law, then certainly, in such a case as this, where there was no prohibition against riding on the engines, it was frequently done by the employees, and it occurred on premises which were used in part for the conduct of the employer’s business . . there should be little doubt that the injury is compensable.” For a view of Minnesota’s change in position, see Prentice v. Twin City Wholesale Grocery, 202 Minn. 455 ( 278 N. W. 895 ). | 1 | 1945–1945 |
McGinnis v. McGinnis
neutral
1 sentence1933In McGinnis v. McGinnis, 1 Ga. 496, 503 , this court discussed the doctrine of election, as follows: “To put the legatee to his election, it is only necessary that the instrument should clearly ascertain the property given; that it was manifestly the intention of the testator to dispose of the property which is not his own; and that the gifts are in such terms as are inconsistent with the notion that the donee can keep his own estate, and also take under the will, without defeating the intention of the testator. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.