discussed rule in New Mexico

1962Again, in the case of Sylvanus v. Pruett, 1932, 36 N.M. 112 , 9 P.2d 142 , the court discussed the doctrine of advancements and this doctrine is not here *20 involved.

1962Again, in the case of Sylvanus v. Pruett, 1932, 36 N.M. 112 , 9 P.2d 142 , the court discussed the doctrine of advancements and this doctrine is not here *20 involved.

2012The record here reflects that the 13 evidence discovered and developed against Defendant on the charges of evading an 14 officer and receiving stolen property is directly linked to Sergeant Taylor’s initial 15 unlawful seizure of Defendant and the officer’s conduct that followed. 16 In Soto, this Court discussed the factors used for “assessing attenuation between 17 illegal police conduct and the discovery of evidence.” 2008-NMCA-032, ¶ 25 .

2012“The 18 three factors are: (1) the amount of time that elapsed between the illegality and the 19 acquisition of evidence; (2) any intervening circumstances; and (3) the purpose and 17 1 the flagrancy of the police misconduct.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation 2 omitted).

2008Maint., 900 P.2d at 1214 . {41} The court discussed the factors relating to a claim of substantial compliance, in relevant part, as follows: Because the statute is designed to protect the public, the public must in fact be protected while the license is under suspension.

1982“While it is the absolute duty of a railroad company to transport freight and passengers, it is not its prime duty to provide depots, waiting rooms, station agents, telephone and telegraph facilities.” Id. at 592 , 13Í P. at 992.

1982In Myers v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, 134 F.2d 457 (10th Cir. 1943), interpreting a New Mexico wrongful death statute authorizing suits by a decedent’s dependents, the court discussed the test for partial dependency and quoted Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co., supra, a Workmen’s Compensation Act case: “Dependency does not necessarily depend upon whether or not the claimants could support themselves without the earnings of the deceased or whether they could have so reduced their living expenses that they could have been supported independent of such earnings.

1980That Rule allows a court to obtain jurisdiction over non-residents in seven situations. 461 F.Supp. at 308 .

1963It is only where there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support the findings that the court is warranted in rejecting the report of the referee.” We cited Davis v. Schwartz, 155 U.S. 631 , 15 S.Ct. 237 , 39 L.Ed. 289 , wherein the court discussed the rule and said that the master’s findings are presumed to be correct and that so far as they depend upon conflicting evidence, or upon the credibility of witnesses, or so far as there is any testimony consistent with the findings, they must be treated as unassailable.

1963It is only where there is a total lack of substantial evidence to support the findings that the court is warranted in rejecting the report of the referee.” We cited Davis v. Schwartz, 155 U.S. 631 , 15 S.Ct. 237 , 39 L.Ed. 289 , wherein the court discussed the rule and said that the master’s findings are presumed to be correct and that so far as they depend upon conflicting evidence, or upon the credibility of witnesses, or so far as there is any testimony consistent with the findings, they must be treated as unassailable.