35 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2026 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vanornumgreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Stewart v. Board of Parole, 312 Or App 32, 35 , 492 P3d 1283 (2021) (“Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023) 345 be relaxed * * *, such that only preservation-of-error princi- ples were in play, neither of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not reasonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”); see generally State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629-30 , 317 P3d 889 (2013) (describing discretionary plain- error review). 2023See, e.g., Stewart v. Board of Parole, 312 Or App 32, 35 , 492 P3d 1283 (2021) (“Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023) 345 be relaxed * * *, such that only preservation-of-error princi- ples were in play, neither of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not reasonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”); see generally State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629-30 , 317 P3d 889 (2013) (describing discretionary plain- error review). | 3 | 3 |
Tuckenberry v. Board of Parolegreen2 sentences2023Relying on Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 642 , 451 P3d 227 (2019), he asks us to relax or set aside the exhaustion requirement. 2023Relying on Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 642 , 451 P3d 227 (2019), he asks us to relax or set aside the exhaustion requirement. | 2 | 5 |
Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality Commissiongreen2 sentences2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin 2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin | 2 | 4 |
Golden Rule Farms v. Water Resources Dept.green2 sentences2026See Golden Rule Farms v. Water Resources Dept., 321 Or App 43, 48 , 515 P3d 908 (2022) (declining to relax or set aside exhaustion requirement when the “petitioner has offered no convincing reason as to why we should do that here”). 2026See Golden Rule Farms v. Water Resources Dept., 321 Or App 43, 48 , 515 P3d 908 (2022) (declining to relax or set aside exhaustion requirement when the “petitioner has offered no convincing reason as to why we should do that here”). | 2 | 2 |
Dreyer v. Portland General Electric Co.green2 sentences2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument 2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument | 2 | 2 |
Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.green2 sentences2009See 282 Or at 618 . 2004See Fifth Avenue Corp., 282 Or at 618 . | 2 | 2 |
Nutbrown v. Munngreen2 sentences2004See Jenkins, 311 Or at 239-40 (legislature added exhaustion requirement to ORS 144.335 to ensure that inmates would be required to present claims first to the board); Fish and *442 Wildlife Dept. v. LCDC, 37 Or App 607, 615 , 588 P2d 80 (1978), aff'd, 208 Or 203 , 603 P2d 1371 (1979) (goals of exhaustion doctrine include not prematurely interrupting agency review and giving agency, with its specialized expertise and the most information available, a full opportunity to determine factual and policy questions with which it is familiar). 2001If the law provides an adequate administrative remedy, then ORS 305.275(4) requires that it be exhausted before a court challenge may be prosecuted.” Id. at 342-43 (footnote omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Application of Portland General Elec. Co.green2 sentences2025Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 250167R 6 (1977)). 2025Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 250167R 6 (1977)). | 1 | 5 |
Miller v. City of Portlandgreen2 sentences2025The exhaustion requirement “is intended to promote ‘orderly procedure and good administration.’ ” Miller v. City of Portland, 356 Or 402, 420 , 338 P3d 685 (2014) (quoting Marbet v. Portland Gen. 2025The exhaustion requirement “is intended to promote ‘orderly procedure and good administration.’ ” Miller v. City of Portland, 356 Or 402, 420 , 338 P3d 685 (2014) (quoting Marbet v. Portland Gen. | 1 | 3 |
Mullenaux v. STATE, BY AND THROUGH OR., ETC.green2 sentences2011That principle flows from the exhaustion requirement in administrative law, viz., "that as to matters within the jurisdiction of an administrative agency [j]udicial review is only available after the procedure for relief within the administrative body itself has been followed without success," Mullenaux v. Dept. of Revenue, 293 Or. 536, 539 , 651 P.2d 724 (1982) (internal quotation marks omitted; brackets in original). [6] Therefore, if APA review could resolve the legality of a challenged agency action, then a party may not initiate a declaratory judgment action regarding the challenged agenc 2011That principle flows from the exhaustion requirement in administrative law, viz., "that as to matters within the jurisdiction of an administrative agency [j]udicial review is only available after the procedure for relief within the administrative body itself has been followed without success," Mullenaux v. Dept. of Revenue, 293 Or. 536, 539 , 651 P.2d 724 (1982) (internal quotation marks omitted; brackets in original). [6] Therefore, if APA review could resolve the legality of a challenged agency action, then a party may not initiate a declaratory judgment action regarding the challenged agenc | 1 | 3 |
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestrygreen2 sentences2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument 2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument | 1 | 2 |
Stewart v. Board of Parolegreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Stewart v. Board of Parole, 312 Or App 32, 35 , 492 P3d 1283 (2021) (“Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023) 345 be relaxed * * *, such that only preservation-of-error princi- ples were in play, neither of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not reasonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”); see generally State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629-30 , 317 P3d 889 (2013) (describing discretionary plain- error review). 2023See, e.g., Stewart v. Board of Parole, 312 Or App 32, 35 , 492 P3d 1283 (2021) (“Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023) 345 be relaxed * * *, such that only preservation-of-error princi- ples were in play, neither of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not reasonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”); see generally State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629-30 , 317 P3d 889 (2013) (describing discretionary plain- error review). | 1 | 1 |
JGB Enterprises, LLC v. OLCCgreen1 sentence2023See, e.g., Stewart v. Board of Parole, 312 Or App 32, 35 , 492 P3d 1283 (2021) (“Even if we were to conclude that the exhaustion requirement should Cite as 325 Or App 326 (2023) 345 be relaxed * * *, such that only preservation-of-error princi- ples were in play, neither of the first two assigned errors is ‘obvious and not reasonably in dispute’ so as to qualify as plain error.”); see generally State v. Vanornum, 354 Or 614, 629-30 , 317 P3d 889 (2013) (describing discretionary plain- error review). | 1 | 1 |
Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson Countygreen2 sentences2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin 2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin | 1 | 1 |
Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugenegreen2 sentences2020See Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugene, 332 Or 293 , 300 n 8, 27 P3d 124 (2001) (“The 1995 Legislature amended ORS 305.275 and eliminated the exhaustion requirement.”). 2020See Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugene, 332 Or 293 , 300 n 8, 27 P3d 124 (2001) (“The 1995 Legislature amended ORS 305.275 and eliminated the exhaustion requirement.”). | 1 | 1 |
Welch v. Washington Countygreen2 sentences2014See Welch v. Washington County, 314 Or 707, 716 , 842 P2d 793 (1992) (noting in tax context that taxpayers have been relieved from obligation to exhaust administrative remedies “most often in situations where the taxpayer has been misled regarding a filing or appeal requirement,” and citing cases); Pierce, 2 Administrative Law Treatise § 15.2 at 1220 (common-law exhaustion requirement does not apply if “considerations of individual justice, efficiency, or wise judicial administration support the need for judicial review in the absence of exhaustion”). 2014See Welch v. Washington County, 314 Or 707, 716 , 842 P2d 793 (1992) (noting in tax context that taxpayers have been relieved from obligation to exhaust administrative remedies “most often in situations where the taxpayer has been misled regarding a filing or appeal requirement,” and citing cases); Pierce, 2 Administrative Law Treatise § 15.2 at 1220 (common-law exhaustion requirement does not apply if “considerations of individual justice, efficiency, or wise judicial administration support the need for judicial review in the absence of exhaustion”). | 1 | 1 |
| Taylor v. Board of Parolegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4Jgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Yousef v. Renogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gonzales-Liranza v. Naranjogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Jenkins v. Board of Parolegreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Dickinsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diegogreen | 1 | 1 |
| First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angelesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bankgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kewin v. Board of Education of the Melvindale-Northern Allen Park Public Schoolsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development Commissiongreen2 sentences2004See Jenkins, 311 Or at 239-40 (legislature added exhaustion requirement to ORS 144.335 to ensure that inmates would be required to present claims first to the board); Fish and *442 Wildlife Dept. v. LCDC, 37 Or App 607, 615 , 588 P2d 80 (1978), aff'd, 208 Or 203 , 603 P2d 1371 (1979) (goals of exhaustion doctrine include not prematurely interrupting agency review and giving agency, with its specialized expertise and the most information available, a full opportunity to determine factual and policy questions with which it is familiar). 1980But see Fish and Wildlife Department v. LCDC, 288 Or 203 , 603 P2d 1391 (1979). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ayres v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
green
2 sentences2013The “doctrine of exhaustion * * * is somewhat ‘flexible’ and is judicially employed to further ‘orderly procedure and good administration.’” Ayres v. Board of Parole, 194 Or App 429, 436 , 97 P3d 1 (2004) (quoting Marbet v. Portland Gen. 2013The “doctrine of exhaustion * * * is somewhat ‘flexible’ and is judicially employed to further ‘orderly procedure and good administration.’” Ayres v. Board of Parole, 194 Or App 429, 436 , 97 P3d 1 (2004) (quoting Marbet v. Portland Gen. | 5 | 2005–2013 |
Lyke v. Lane County
green
2 sentences2011Lyke v. Lane County, 70 Or.App. 82, 85 , 688 P.2d 411 (1984). 2011Lyke v. Lane County, 70 Or.App. 82, 85 , 688 P.2d 411 (1984). | 3 | 1986–2011 |
State v. Civil
green
2 sentences2023For relief from registration or reclassification under ORS 163A.125, the Board shall consider the registrant’s time sexual offense-free in the community after conviction in determining whether to grant a petition for relief from the registration obligation or reclassification.” OAR 255-085-0020(6) (Nov 25, 2020). 1 See State v. Civil, 283 Or App 395, 416 , 388 P3d 1185 (2017) (articulating a rigorous standard for overruling our own case law when it is “plainly wrong”). 56 Lewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole If we were to relax or set aside the exhaustion requirement and consider petitioner’s argum 2023For relief from registration or reclassification under ORS 163A.125, the Board shall consider the registrant’s time sexual offense-free in the community after conviction in determining whether to grant a petition for relief from the registration obligation or reclassification.” OAR 255-085-0020(6) (Nov 25, 2020). 1 See State v. Civil, 283 Or App 395, 416 , 388 P3d 1185 (2017) (articulating a rigorous standard for overruling our own case law when it is “plainly wrong”). 56 Lewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole If we were to relax or set aside the exhaustion requirement and consider petitioner’s argum | 2 | 2023–2023 |
McKart v. United States
green
2 sentences2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin 2022Quality Comm., 26 Or App 717, 721-22 , 554 P2d 620 (1976) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 US 185 , 89 S Ct 1657 , 23 L Ed 2d 194 (1969)); see also Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson County, 168 Or App 624, 630 , 4 P3d 748 , rev den, 331 Or 429 (2000) (recognizing that APA exclusivity serves the same purposes as the exhaustion requirement, because “the APA establishes a comprehensive pattern for the judicial review of administrative decisions” (internal citation omitted)).1 1 We express no opinion on the propriety of the board’s apparent practice of informing license applicants that pursuin | 2 | 1978–2022 |
Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply
green
2 sentences2016Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply, 336 Or 349, 368 , 84 P3d 119 (2004). 2016Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply, 336 Or 349, 368 , 84 P3d 119 (2004). | 2 | 2006–2016 |
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
green
2 sentences2016“The doctrine of exhaustion [of remedies] applies when a party, without conforming to the applicable statutes or rules, seeks judicial determination of a matter that was or should have been submitted to the administrative agency for decision.” Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or 634, 661 , 20 P3d 180 (2001). 2006"The doctrine of exhaustion [of remedies] applies when a party, without conforming to the applicable statutes or rules, seeks judicial determination of a matter that was or should have been submitted to the administrative agency for decision." Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or. 634, 661 , 20 P.3d 180 (2001). | 2 | 2006–2016 |
State v. Kruchek
green
2 sentences2016“The doctrine of exhaustion [of remedies] applies when a party, without conforming to the applicable statutes or rules, seeks judicial determination of a matter that was or should have been submitted to the administrative agency for decision.” Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or 634, 661 , 20 P3d 180 (2001). 2006"The doctrine of exhaustion [of remedies] applies when a party, without conforming to the applicable statutes or rules, seeks judicial determination of a matter that was or should have been submitted to the administrative agency for decision." Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or. 634, 661 , 20 P.3d 180 (2001). | 2 | 2006–2016 |
McCarthy v. Madigan
red
2 sentences2011In McCarthy , the Court concluded that the exhaustion principle did not prevent the petitioner from bringing his claim seeking compensatory relief for a violation of his rights as guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution because, in part, "the administrative `remedy' does not authorize an award of monetary damagesthe only relief requested by [the petitioner] in this action." Id. at 152 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 . [9] Further, we note again that part of PERB's reasoning for dismissing the contested case proceeding was that plaintiff could not recover in that proceeding the c 2011In McCarthy , the Court concluded that the exhaustion principle did not prevent the petitioner from bringing his claim seeking compensatory relief for a violation of his rights as guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution because, in part, "the administrative `remedy' does not authorize an award of monetary damagesthe only relief requested by [the petitioner] in this action." Id. at 152 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 . [9] Further, we note again that part of PERB's reasoning for dismissing the contested case proceeding was that plaintiff could not recover in that proceeding the c | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Eppler v. Board of Tax Service Examiners
neutral
2 sentences2011Eppler v. Board of Tax Service Examiners, 189 Or.App. 216, 219 , 75 P.3d 900 (2003); see also Bay River, 26 Or.App. at 720 , 554 P.2d 620 ("A party cannot ignore the judicial review provisions of the APA in favor of a general equitable or declaratory remedy."). 2011Eppler v. Board of Tax Service Examiners, 189 Or.App. 216, 219 , 75 P.3d 900 (2003); see also Bay River, 26 Or.App. at 720 , 554 P.2d 620 ("A party cannot ignore the judicial review provisions of the APA in favor of a general equitable or declaratory remedy."). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Muller v. State
neutral
2 sentences2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument 2011Cf. Boise Cascade Corp., 325 Or. at 193 , 935 P.2d 411 (explaining that, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, "[t]he court retains jurisdiction over the dispute itself and all other issues raised by the dispute, but it cannot resolve that dispute until the agency has resolved the issue that is in its primary jurisdiction" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Dreyer v. PGE, 341 Or. 262, 283, 287 , 142 P.3d 1010 (2006) (concluding that court had "legal duty to abate the proceedings" pending agency's resolution of issues within its primary jurisdiction). [10] According to defendant's argument | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union 223
green
2 sentences2025To exhaust one’s remedies “* * * requires that the issues of the dispute be submitted to the administrative agency for consideration of the merits of the dispute.” See Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union #223, 208 Or App 271, 277 , 145 P3d 187 (2006) (discussing the doctrine of exhaustion, generally). 2025To exhaust one’s remedies “* * * requires that the issues of the dispute be submitted to the administrative agency for consideration of the merits of the dispute.” See Lake County v. Teamsters Local Union #223, 208 Or App 271, 277 , 145 P3d 187 (2006) (discussing the doctrine of exhaustion, generally). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Wang v. Board of Massage Therapists
neutral
1 sentence2022Cite as 322 Or App 491 (2022) 495 Thus, we agree with the trial court that plaintiff’s remedy, if any, was through the administrative process rather than through a declaratory judgment action. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Zollinger v. Warner
green
2 sentences2014The exhaustion doctrine applies “where one seeks prematurely to obtain judicial review of or judicial intervention into the action of an agency * * * without waiting to see whether the agency will in fact take the desired action.” Zollinger v. Warner, 286 Or 19, 25 , 593 P2d 1107 (1979). 2014The exhaustion doctrine applies “where one seeks prematurely to obtain judicial review of or judicial intervention into the action of an agency * * * without waiting to see whether the agency will in fact take the desired action.” Zollinger v. Warner, 286 Or 19, 25 , 593 P2d 1107 (1979). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Olsen v. Deschutes County green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| Department of Revenue v. Welch green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERB green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City red | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Ragsdale v. Department of Revenue green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development Commission green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Carson Lynn Brown v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden Peter W. Vidor, Named as Pete Vidor on Complaint, Deputy Warden Ray Palmer, Adw of Custody T. Luna green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| George Wyatt v. Michael Leonard Geri Mangas Mario Marroquin Lt. Pierce Burton L. Cronk B.G. Hummel C/o Walters, Sgt. Hefner green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Demetrius Knuckles El Errick E. Payton-Bey Michael Vaughn v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Greg Curry v. David Scott green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Alexander L. Baxter v. Jim Rose, James Davis, Nicky Jordan, Scotty Smith, Bobby Pevahouse, Bert Staggs, and Jim Bevis green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Williams v. Bankers National Insurance green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Andrews v. Warren Lumber & Paint Co. green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Franden v. Jonasson green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| United States v. Superior Court green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Miller v. SCHRUNK green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY. green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Willamette Valley Lumber Co. v. State Tax Commission neutral | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.