Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
31 Alabama opinions name it 4 courts 1859–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Troy Universitygreen1 sentence2015“This form of immunity is distinct from the discretionary or State-agent immunity discussed in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), which dealt with claims against State agents sued in their personal, or individual, capacities, which were not, in effect, claims against the State.” Ex parte Troy Univ., 961 So.2d 105, 108 (Ala.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Cowabunga, Inc.green1 sentence2013Although we acknowledge that there may be valid reasons in certain cases for deeming particular orders, including nonfinal orders pertaining to compensability, to be tantamount to “determination[s] ... entered after ... nonjury trial[s]” in cases arising under the Act so as to trigger the findings- and-conclusions requirement, cf. Ex parte Cowabunga, Inc., 67 So.3d 136, 139 (Ala. Civ.App.2011), the summary judgment entered in this case, which is based primarily upon written submissions of the parties and limited testimony from Devero at the motion hearing, 1 is due to be reviewed on its merits | 1 | 1 |
Elliott v. Elliottgreen1 sentence2012See Robinson v. Robinson, 795 So.2d 729, 731 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (observing that the trial court “awarded the wife periodic alimony in the form of a requirement that the husband pay for her health insurance for 36 months”); Parker v. Parker, 639 So.2d 1376, 1380 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (noting that “the wife was awarded $500 per month plus $215 per month for COBRA coverage as periodic alimony”); and Elliott v. Elliott, 579 So.2d 1383,1384 (Ala.Civ.App.1991) (affirming an award to the wife of “$125.00 per week alimony as long as the husband maintains a specific hospital and medical insurance benefit | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Parkergreen1 sentence2012See Robinson v. Robinson, 795 So.2d 729, 731 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (observing that the trial court “awarded the wife periodic alimony in the form of a requirement that the husband pay for her health insurance for 36 months”); Parker v. Parker, 639 So.2d 1376, 1380 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (noting that “the wife was awarded $500 per month plus $215 per month for COBRA coverage as periodic alimony”); and Elliott v. Elliott, 579 So.2d 1383,1384 (Ala.Civ.App.1991) (affirming an award to the wife of “$125.00 per week alimony as long as the husband maintains a specific hospital and medical insurance benefit | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2012See Robinson v. Robinson, 795 So.2d 729, 731 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (observing that the trial court “awarded the wife periodic alimony in the form of a requirement that the husband pay for her health insurance for 36 months”); Parker v. Parker, 639 So.2d 1376, 1380 (Ala.Civ.App.1994) (noting that “the wife was awarded $500 per month plus $215 per month for COBRA coverage as periodic alimony”); and Elliott v. Elliott, 579 So.2d 1383,1384 (Ala.Civ.App.1991) (affirming an award to the wife of “$125.00 per week alimony as long as the husband maintains a specific hospital and medical insurance benefit | 1 | 1 |
California v. Prysockgreen1 sentence2012See California v, Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 363 (1981) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (holding “[t]he warnings given [defendant] were defective, not because ‘the officer did not parrot the language of Miranda,’ but because, in the form in which the warnings were given, they failed to convey the essential information required by Miranda.”). | 1 | 1 |
Northeast Utilities v. PITTMAN TRUCKINGgreen1 sentence2007Since the personal representative of the estate of a deceased employee who has left dependents has no right to bring a third party action, the courts usually ... consider any payments made to the personal representative to be payments recovered by the dependents.” 2 Moore, Alabama Workers’ Compensation § 21:74 (footnotes omitted); accord Northeast Utils., Inc. v. Pittman Trucking Co., 595 So.2d 1351, 1354 (Ala.1992) (“employers are entitled to be reimbursed out of any judgment recovered by the employee or his personal representative in an action against the third-party tort-feasor” (emphasis a | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Davisgreen1 sentence2003The present form of the doctrine in this State was most recently discussed by the Court of Civil Appeals: "Under Alabama law, `[t]he parental immunity doctrine prohibits all civil suits brought by unemancipated minor children against their parents for the torts of their parents.' Mitchell v. Davis, 598 So.2d 801, 803 (Ala.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Kelley v. Stategreen2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Cranman
green
2 sentences2015“This form of immunity is distinct from the discretionary or State-agent immunity discussed in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), which dealt with claims against State agents sued in their personal, or individual, capacities, which were not, in effect, claims against the State.” Ex parte Troy Univ., 961 So.2d 105, 108 (Ala.2006). 2010This form of immunity has been incorporated into the analysis for determining State-agent immunity under the rule as restated in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), which analysis the trial court in this case has yet to perform. | 3 | 2006–2015 |
Square v. State
green
2 sentences1971The form of warning does not strictly comply with Square v. State, 283 Ala. 548 , 219 So.2d 377 . 1971The form of warning does not strictly comply with Square v. State, 283 Ala. 548 , 219 So.2d 377 . | 3 | 1969–1971 |
Morris v. State
green
2 sentences1956Morris v. State, 146 Ala. 66 , 41 So. 274 .” To the same effect is Crenshaw v. State, 153 Ala. 5 , 45 So. 631 ; Pelham v. State, 24 Ala.App, 330, 134 So. 888 ; Woodard v. State, 253 Ala. 259 , 44 So.2d 241 ; Jones v. State, 260 Ala. 341 , 70 So.2d 629 . 1956Morris v. State, 146 Ala. 66 , 41 So. 274 .” To the same effect is Crenshaw v. State, 153 Ala. 5 , 45 So. 631 ; Pelham v. State, 24 Ala.App, 330, 134 So. 888 ; Woodard v. State, 253 Ala. 259 , 44 So.2d 241 ; Jones v. State, 260 Ala. 341 , 70 So.2d 629 . | 3 | 1930–1956 |
Kansas v. Hendricks
green
2 sentences1999Here, the parties seem to agree that this Court should apply a form of the standard recently discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 , 117 S.Ct. 2072 , 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997). 1999Here, the parties seem to agree that this Court should apply a form of the standard recently discussed by the United States Supreme Court in Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 , 117 S.Ct. 2072 , 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Pelham v. State
neutral
2 sentences1956Morris v. State, 146 Ala. 66 , 41 So. 274 .” To the same effect is Crenshaw v. State, 153 Ala. 5 , 45 So. 631 ; Pelham v. State, 24 Ala.App, 330, 134 So. 888 ; Woodard v. State, 253 Ala. 259 , 44 So.2d 241 ; Jones v. State, 260 Ala. 341 , 70 So.2d 629 . 1950Morris v. State, 146 Ala. 66 , 41 So. 274 ; Pelham v. State, 24 Ala.App. 330 , 134 So. 888 , certiorari denied, 223 Ala. 155 , 134 So. 890 ; Bush v. State, 23 Ala.App. 502 , 127 So. 909 . | 2 | 1950–1956 |
Town of Eutaw v. Botnick
green
2 sentences1914It may be conceded that, where the question is whether property has been either damaged or benefited, the proper form of inquiry, if specific, should be as to the value of the property before and after the damnifying or benefiting act has taken effect.—Town of Eutaw v. Botnick, 150 Ala. 429 , 43 South. 739 . 1914It may be conceded that, where the question is whether property has been either damaged or benefited, the proper form of inquiry, if specific, should be as to the value of the property before and after the damnifying or benefiting act has taken effect.—Town of Eutaw v. Botnick, 150 Ala. 429 , 43 South. 739 . | 2 | 1914–1947 |
Wyatt v. Bronner
green
1 sentence2006In January 2002, the federal district court entered an order as to Dupree and Wood's motion, stating that Earl was entitled to "back pay damages in the amount of $794.80" as to Dupree 5 and to "injunctive relief in the form of a hearing before the State Personnel Board" as to Wood, "in his official capacity as the current Executive Director of the DYS." 6 The federal district court stated: "Although [Earl] did not avail himself of the remedies provided under the Alabama Merit System Act when he was discharged, this Court agrees with the court's holding in Wyatt v. Bronner , 500 F.Supp. 817 , 8 | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Gibbons v. United States
green
2 sentences2000The explanation most commonly quoted is that of Mr. Justice Holmes, in Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, (1907) 205 U.S. 349, 353 , 27 S.Ct. 526 , 51 L.Ed. 834 : `A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.' A separate idea of substantive immunity, as distinct from the denial of the right to sue, also appeared in the federal decisions, and in Gibbons v. United States, (1868) 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 269 , 19 L.Ed. 453 , 2000The explanation most commonly quoted is that of Mr. Justice Holmes, in Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, (1907) 205 U.S. 349, 353 , 27 S.Ct. 526 , 51 L.Ed. 834 : `A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.' A separate idea of substantive immunity, as distinct from the denial of the right to sue, also appeared in the federal decisions, and in Gibbons v. United States, (1868) 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 269 , 19 L.Ed. 453 , | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Coffin v. United States
green
2 sentences2000Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 484 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1934 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978); Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 452-53 , 15 S.Ct. 394, 402 , 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895). ‘While the legal scholar may understand that the presumption of innocence and the prosecutor’s burden of proof are logically similar, the ordinary citizen well may draw significant additional guidance from an instruction on the presumption of innocence.’ Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. at 484 , 98 S.Ct. at 1934 . “ ‘[I]n a criminal case the term [presumption of innocence] does convey a special and perhaps useful hint over and 2000Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 484 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1934 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978); Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 452-53 , 15 S.Ct. 394, 402 , 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895). ‘While the legal scholar may understand that the presumption of innocence and the prosecutor’s burden of proof are logically similar, the ordinary citizen well may draw significant additional guidance from an instruction on the presumption of innocence.’ Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. at 484 , 98 S.Ct. at 1934 . “ ‘[I]n a criminal case the term [presumption of innocence] does convey a special and perhaps useful hint over and | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Kawananakoa v. Polyblank
green
2 sentences2000The explanation most commonly quoted is that of Mr. Justice Holmes, in Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, (1907) 205 U.S. 349, 353 , 27 S.Ct. 526 , 51 L.Ed. 834 : `A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.' A separate idea of substantive immunity, as distinct from the denial of the right to sue, also appeared in the federal decisions, and in Gibbons v. United States, (1868) 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 269 , 19 L.Ed. 453 , 2000The explanation most commonly quoted is that of Mr. Justice Holmes, in Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, (1907) 205 U.S. 349, 353 , 27 S.Ct. 526 , 51 L.Ed. 834 : `A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.' A separate idea of substantive immunity, as distinct from the denial of the right to sue, also appeared in the federal decisions, and in Gibbons v. United States, (1868) 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 269 , 19 L.Ed. 453 , | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Taylor v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2000Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 484 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1934 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978); Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 452-53 , 15 S.Ct. 394, 402 , 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895). ‘While the legal scholar may understand that the presumption of innocence and the prosecutor’s burden of proof are logically similar, the ordinary citizen well may draw significant additional guidance from an instruction on the presumption of innocence.’ Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. at 484 , 98 S.Ct. at 1934 . “ ‘[I]n a criminal case the term [presumption of innocence] does convey a special and perhaps useful hint over and 2000Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 484 , 98 S.Ct. 1930, 1934 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978); Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 452-53 , 15 S.Ct. 394, 402 , 39 L.Ed. 481 (1895). ‘While the legal scholar may understand that the presumption of innocence and the prosecutor’s burden of proof are logically similar, the ordinary citizen well may draw significant additional guidance from an instruction on the presumption of innocence.’ Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. at 484 , 98 S.Ct. at 1934 . “ ‘[I]n a criminal case the term [presumption of innocence] does convey a special and perhaps useful hint over and | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Veith v. State
green
2 sentences1985Veith v. State, 48 Ala.App. 688, 697 , 267 So.2d 480 (1972). 1985Veith v. State, 48 Ala.App. 688, 697 , 267 So.2d 480 (1972). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Montgomery v. State
green
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Moss v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Davis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Garrett v. State
neutral
1 sentence1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Webb v. State
green
1 sentence1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Davis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Ex Parte Corbin
green
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Corbin v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). 1979Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18 , 14 So. 327 ; Webb v. State, 106 Ala. 52 , 18 So. 491 ." To the same effect are Montgomery v. State, 160 Ala. 7 , 49 So. 902 (1909); Moss v. State, 190 Ala. 14 , 67 So. 431 (1914); Corbin v. State, 19 Ala.App. 439 , 98 So. 132, 134 , cert. denied, 210 Ala. 369 , 98 So. 134 (1923); Kelley v. State, 32 Ala.App. 408 , 26 So.2d 633, 637 (1946); Davis v. State, 36 Ala.App. 573 , 62 So.2d 224 , cert. denied, 258 Ala. 281 , 62 So.2d 229 (1953). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
McCants v. State
green
2 sentences1971However, since Dotson was not an indigent it would seem that McCants v. State, 282 Ala. 397 , 211 So.2d 877 , would control here as an exception to Square . 1971However, since Dotson was not an indigent it would seem that McCants v. State, 282 Ala. 397 , 211 So.2d 877 , would control here as an exception to Square . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| Crenshaw v. State green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Woodard v. State green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Jones v. State neutral | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Bush v. State neutral | 1 | 1950–1950 |
| Pelham v. State green | 1 | 1950–1950 |
| Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. Mobile Mutual Insurance neutral | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Trammell green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Espalla v. Richard & Sons green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Blan v. Hollywood Realty Co. green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Hicks v. Biddle green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| State ex rel. Garber v. Semmes neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Meyers v. Martinez neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Eslava v. Jones neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Wise v. Spears green | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| State Ex Rel. Wright v. Kemp neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Carothers v. McNabb neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Cooper v. Cooper green | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Martin v. Alabama Power Co. neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
| Lathrop Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber Co. neutral | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.