Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1892–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Malnak v. Yogigreen2 sentences2013The genesis of this approach was a 5 In Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), the Supreme Court examined and “balanced” the interests of the state and the defendants in determining whether the “exercise of religion” by Amish who believed children should not attend school past a certain age, prevented a criminal conviction for violating the State’s compulsory school attendance law. 8 concurring opinion in Malnak v. Yogi, 592 F.2d 197 (3d Cir. 1979), and a form of its analysis has since been adopted by at least five of the federal circuit courts of appeals and numerous district and state cour 2013The genesis of this approach was a concurring opinion in Malnak v. Yogi 592 F.2d 197 (3d Cir.1979), and a form of its analysis has since been adopted by at least five of the federal circuit courts of appeals and numerous district and state courts. | 2 | 2 |
Aldape v. Akinsgreen2 sentences1985See Aldape v. Akins, 105 Idaho 254 , 668 P.2d 130 (Ct. App.1983). 1985See Aldape v. Akins, 105 Idaho 254 , 668 P.2d 130 (Ct. App.1983). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hamptongreen1 sentence2025See State v. Hampton, 92 P.3d 871, 874 (Ariz. 2004) (explaining that the court must “both warn[] the defendant 22 that further disruptive conduct may result in the loss of the right to counsel and explain[] the implications of such a waiver.”); United States v. McLeod, 53 F.3d 322 , 325–26 (11th Cir. 1995) (distinguishing between “waiver” and “forfeiture,” the Eleventh Circuit held that a defendant’s abusive conduct toward his attorney could result in the forfeiture of the right to counsel.); United States v. Allen, 895 F.2d 1577 (10th Cir.1990) (district court properly treated defendant’s dil | 1 | 1 |
Jordan v. Massachusettsgreen1 sentence2013The question presented is whether an inquiry should have been allowed at all. 4 The United States Supreme Court has long recognized that “[d]ue process implies a tribunal both impartial and mentally competent to afford a hearing.” Jordan v. Com. of Massachusetts, 225 U.S. 167, 176 (1912). | 1 | 1 |
Halen v. Stategreen2 sentences2010In Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 832 , 41 P.3d 257, 260 (2002), the Court stated: “The defendant’s willingness to take another form of test generally does not negate the effect of his refusal to submit to the form of test requested by the officer.” (citing Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 ). 2010In Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 832 , 41 P.3d 257, 260 (2002), the Court stated: “The defendant’s willingness to take another form of test generally does not negate the effect of his refusal to submit to the form of test requested by the officer.” (citing Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 ). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hickmanngreen2 sentences1990See State v. Hickmann, 273 Or. 358 , 540 P.2d 1406, 1407 (1975) ("Since the State did not rely upon `consent' as a basis to justify the warrantless search at the trial court level or on appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals [remanding to the trial court for findings on the issue of consent] is reversed.") 1990See State v. Hickmann, 273 Or. 358 , 540 P.2d 1406, 1407 (1975) ("Since the State did not rely upon `consent' as a basis to justify the warrantless search at the trial court level or on appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals [remanding to the trial court for findings on the issue of consent] is reversed.") | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Watsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Garciagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ratliff v. Eplinggreen | 1 | 1 |
| Young v. Hamilton Watch Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Griffiths
green
2 sentences2010In Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 832 , 41 P.3d 257, 260 (2002), the Court stated: “The defendant’s willingness to take another form of test generally does not negate the effect of his refusal to submit to the form of test requested by the officer.” (citing Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 ). 2010In Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 832 , 41 P.3d 257, 260 (2002), the Court stated: “The defendant’s willingness to take another form of test generally does not negate the effect of his refusal to submit to the form of test requested by the officer.” (citing Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 ). | 2 | 2002–2010 |
United States v. Jackie McLeod
green
1 sentence2025See State v. Hampton, 92 P.3d 871, 874 (Ariz. 2004) (explaining that the court must “both warn[] the defendant 22 that further disruptive conduct may result in the loss of the right to counsel and explain[] the implications of such a waiver.”); United States v. McLeod, 53 F.3d 322 , 325–26 (11th Cir. 1995) (distinguishing between “waiver” and “forfeiture,” the Eleventh Circuit held that a defendant’s abusive conduct toward his attorney could result in the forfeiture of the right to counsel.); United States v. Allen, 895 F.2d 1577 (10th Cir.1990) (district court properly treated defendant’s dil | 1 | 2025–2025 |
United States v. Lewis D. Allen
green
1 sentence2025See State v. Hampton, 92 P.3d 871, 874 (Ariz. 2004) (explaining that the court must “both warn[] the defendant 22 that further disruptive conduct may result in the loss of the right to counsel and explain[] the implications of such a waiver.”); United States v. McLeod, 53 F.3d 322 , 325–26 (11th Cir. 1995) (distinguishing between “waiver” and “forfeiture,” the Eleventh Circuit held that a defendant’s abusive conduct toward his attorney could result in the forfeiture of the right to counsel.); United States v. Allen, 895 F.2d 1577 (10th Cir.1990) (district court properly treated defendant’s dil | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Wisconsin v. Yoder
green
1 sentence2013The genesis of this approach was a 5 In Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), the Supreme Court examined and “balanced” the interests of the state and the defendants in determining whether the “exercise of religion” by Amish who believed children should not attend school past a certain age, prevented a criminal conviction for violating the State’s compulsory school attendance law. 8 concurring opinion in Malnak v. Yogi, 592 F.2d 197 (3d Cir. 1979), and a form of its analysis has since been adopted by at least five of the federal circuit courts of appeals and numerous district and state cour | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Young v. Scott
green
2 sentences2008Our decision in Young v. Scott, 108 Idaho 506 , 700 P.2d 128 , is not to the contrary. 2008Our decision in Young v. Scott, 108 Idaho 506 , 700 P.2d 128 , is not to the contrary. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Gibson green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Fetterly green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Major green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Windsor green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Scroggins green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Stuart
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. McKinney
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Bainbridge
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Aragon green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Makin v. Liddle green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Charboneau
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Needs green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Olin
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Sivak green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Fuchs
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| McKinney v. State green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Lindquist
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Padilla green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Creech
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Fetterly
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Beam
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Lankford
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Griffiths
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Osborn
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
David W. McKay v. Texas
green
2 sentences1990State v. Lankford, 116 Idaho 860 , 781 P.2d 197 , stay granted, 490 U.S. 1061 , 109 S.Ct. 2058 , 104 L.Ed.2d 623 (1989); State v. Charboneau, 116 Idaho 129 , 774 P.2d 299 (1989); McKinney v. State, 115 Idaho 1125 , 772 P.2d 1219 (1989); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231 , 766 P.2d 701 (1988); State v. Scroggins, 110 Idaho 380 , 716 P.2d 1152 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Windsor, 110 Idaho 410 , 716 P.2d 1182 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985), 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Reiter v. Huffman green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Harvey v. Breeding green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
California v. Tenneco Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1990State v. Lankford, 116 Idaho 860 , 781 P.2d 197 , stay granted, 490 U.S. 1061 , 109 S.Ct. 2058 , 104 L.Ed.2d 623 (1989); State v. Charboneau, 116 Idaho 129 , 774 P.2d 299 (1989); McKinney v. State, 115 Idaho 1125 , 772 P.2d 1219 (1989); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231 , 766 P.2d 701 (1988); State v. Scroggins, 110 Idaho 380 , 716 P.2d 1152 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Windsor, 110 Idaho 410 , 716 P.2d 1182 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985), 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Dobbert v. Strickland green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Mahoney v. United States
green
2 sentences1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Woolls v. Texas green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Craig v. Engle green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Salgado-Hernandez v. United States green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Riveland v. Ball
green
2 sentences1990State v. Lankford, 116 Idaho 860 , 781 P.2d 197 , stay granted, 490 U.S. 1061 , 109 S.Ct. 2058 , 104 L.Ed.2d 623 (1989); State v. Charboneau, 116 Idaho 129 , 774 P.2d 299 (1989); McKinney v. State, 115 Idaho 1125 , 772 P.2d 1219 (1989); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231 , 766 P.2d 701 (1988); State v. Scroggins, 110 Idaho 380 , 716 P.2d 1152 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Windsor, 110 Idaho 410 , 716 P.2d 1182 (1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 964 , 107 S.Ct. 463 , 93 L.Ed.2d 408 (1986); State v. Fetterly, 109 Idaho 766 , 710 P.2d 1202 (1985), 1990The report may be in the form of a standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the Supreme Court of Idaho. (b) The Supreme Court of Idaho shall consider the punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal. (c) With regard to the sentence the court shall determine: (1) Whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor, and (2) Whether the evidence supports the judge's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance form among those enumerated in section 19-2515, Idaho Code, and (3) Whether the sentence of death is | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.