19 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1908–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.green1 sentence2025See Monell v. New York City Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (discussing the municipality immunity standard). 20 common-law qualified immunity as the same thing, while often failing to address municipal immunity altogether. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Ark. Farmers Ass'ngreen2 sentences2008If he relies on defects in form in refusing to allow a claim, he should make known his objection seasonably.” 232 Ark. at 187-88 , 334 S.W.2d at 888 (emphasis added). 2008If he relies on defects in form in refusing to allow a claim, he should make known his objection seasonably.” 232 Ark. at 187-88 , 334 S.W.2d at 888 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heigle v. Miller
green
2 sentences2015Heigle v. Miller, 332 Ark. 315 , 965 S.W.2d 116 (1998). | fiTo constitute willful or wanton conduct, there must be deliberate intention to harm or an utter indifference to, or conscious disregard of, the safety of others. 2015Heigle v. Miller, 332 Ark. 315 , 965 S.W.2d 116 (1998). | fiTo constitute willful or wanton conduct, there must be deliberate intention to harm or an utter indifference to, or conscious disregard of, the safety of others. | 2 | 2014–2015 |
Bader v. Lawson
green
2 sentences1998Id. 1997Id. | 2 | 1997–1998 |
Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Serv., Inc., 361 Ark. 390 , 206 S.W.3d 842 (2005). 2016Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Serv., Inc., 361 Ark. 390 , 206 S.W.3d 842 (2005). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
BALDWIN BY BALDWIN v. Mosley
green
2 sentences2003Heigle, supra. Appellant cites Baldwin v. Mosley, 295 Ark. 285 , 748 S.W.2d 146 (1998), for the proposition that parental supervision is only relevant where the dangerous condition is open and obvious or where the parent has been warned of danger. 2003Heigle, supra. Appellant cites Baldwin v. Mosley, 295 Ark. 285 , 748 S.W.2d 146 (1998), for the proposition that parental supervision is only relevant where the dangerous condition is open and obvious or where the parent has been warned of danger. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Charles Goss v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Charles Goss v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas
green
1 sentence2001Sincerely, MARK PRYOR Attorney General MP:JD/cyh Enclosures 1 In Goss v. City of Little Rock, 151 F.3d 861 (8th Cir. 1998), the court affirmed the trial court's subsequent determination that the city's condition amounted to a taking. 2 Black's Law Dictionary (7 th ed. 1999) defines the term "dedication" in the alternative as "[t]he donation of land or creation of an easement for public use." 3 This pronouncement is dictum because the Court ruled that it need not even reach this issue given that appellant had failed to raise it below in the form of a challenge to a jury instruction. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Hill v. State
green
2 sentences1991Hill, 303 Ark. at 468-69 , 798 S.W.2d at 69 . 1991Hill, 303 Ark. at 468-69 , 798 S.W.2d at 69 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Spies v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1978Spies v. People, 122 Ill. 1 , 12 N.E. 865 , error dism. 123 U.S. 131 , 8 S. Ct. 22 , 31 L. 1978Spies v. People, 122 Ill. 1 , 12 N.E. 865 , error dism. 123 U.S. 131 , 8 S. Ct. 22 , 31 L. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Spies v. People
green
2 sentences1978Spies v. People, 122 Ill. 1 , 12 N.E. 865 , error dism. 123 U.S. 131 , 8 S. Ct. 22 , 31 L. 1978Spies v. People, 122 Ill. 1 , 12 N.E. 865 , error dism. 123 U.S. 131 , 8 S. Ct. 22 , 31 L. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1975Co., 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S. Ct. 652 , 94 L. 1975Co., 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S. Ct. 652 , 94 L. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Mills v. Franklin
neutral
2 sentences1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . 1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson
neutral
2 sentences1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . 1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell
neutral
2 sentences1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . 1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber & Handle Co. v. Good
green
2 sentences1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . 1929Prairie Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Kittrell, 106 Ark. 138 , 153 S. W. 89 ; Ferguson & Wheeler Land, Lumber Handle Co. v. Good, 112 Ark. 260 , 165 S. W. 628 ; Mills v. Franklin, 130 Ark. 80 , 196 S. W. 928 ; Arkansas Short Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilkinson, 154 Ark. 455 , 243 S. W. 819 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Ware v. State
green
2 sentences1928It is substantially in the same form as the instruction given in Ware v. State, 59 Ark. 379 , 27 S. W. 485 . 1928It is substantially in the same form as the instruction given in Ware v. State, 59 Ark. 379 , 27 S. W. 485 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Burnett v. State
green
1 sentence1925In the case of Burnett v. State, 80 Ark. 225 -227, the court having under consideration an -objection of similar purport, speaking through Chief Justice Hill, used the following language: “But, the court having used the- esa-ct language of the statute, which is reasonably clear, it devolved upon the appellant to point out this formal defect if he was not satisfied that the form of this instruction correctly presented the thought of it,. ’ ’ The fact that the jury returned a verdict finding appellant guilty of murder in the ¡second degree ¡showed that they believed him guilty, ¡and whether this | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Benson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1923An instruction numbered 7 was given which reads as follows: “In determining whether or not the defendant was interested in the making and manufacture of the mash or beer, as alleged in the indictment, you have a right to take into consideration the fact that he visited the home of the witness Moore in the night time, if you so find; the fact that he procured a horse and slide and moved a still away from the home, if you so find; his actions and conduct at the time; his statements to the officers, if any; and all other facts and circumstances offered in proof; and, if you find from the testimon | 1 | 1923–1923 |
State v. Maupin
neutral
1 sentence1914In the case of State v. Maupin, 57 Mo. 205 , the charge in the indictment was that the defendant had forged a judge’s certificate to a fee bill, and the indictment set forth, in extenso, the certificate, but not the fee bill. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Hogue v. State
green
1 sentence1910It does not necessarily constitute prejudicial error to give such an instruction (Hogue v. State, 93 Ark. 316 ); but this court has several times held that it is better practice not to give an instruction in that form, and that a case will not be reversed on account of the failure of a trial court to do so. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Fordyce v. Nix
green
1 sentence1908Fordyce v. Nix, 58 Ark. 136 ; St. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.