15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1874–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bowyer v. Clark Equipment Co.green2 sentences1996Co., 171 Ind.App. 431 , 357 N.E.2d 290, 294 (1976) is cited for the principle that a waiver of consent contained in a guaranty must be expressly stated. 1996Co., 171 Ind.App. 431 , 357 N.E.2d 290, 294 (1976) is cited for the principle that a waiver of consent contained in a guaranty must be expressly stated. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Steam Navigation Co. v. Weed
neutral
2 sentences1879So, a person who has borrowed money of a savings institution upon his promissory note, secured by a pledge of bank stock, is not entitled to an injunction to prevent the prosecution of the note, upon the ground that the sayings bank was prohibited by its charter from making loans of that description. ” The case of The Steam Navigation Company v. Weed, 17 Barb. 378 , was one to recover money loaned. 1874So, a person who has borrowed money of a savings institution upon his promissory note, secured by a pledge of bank-stock, is not entitled to an injunction to prevent the prosecution of the note, upon the ground that the savings bank was prohibited by its charter from making loans of that description.” In Township of Pine Grove v. Talcott, 19 Wal. 666, this ^statement of the law is copied into his opinion by Swayne, J., and, although the case was decided upon another point, it was stated by the learned judge, that “the authorities referred to sustain the text.” The Steam Navigation Company v. W | 2 | 1874–1879 |
State v. Arthur
green
1 sentence2013This flies in the face of “the principle that the presumption of innocence abides in the accused for all purposes while awaiting trial.” Arthur, 390 So.2d at 719 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hayden v. State
green
2 sentences1984Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 236 N.E.2d 597 ; Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591 , 199 N.E.2d 102 , cert. denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1013 , 86 S.Ct. 1926 , 16 LEd.2d 1034. 1984Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 236 N.E.2d 597 ; Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591 , 199 N.E.2d 102 , cert. denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1013 , 86 S.Ct. 1926 , 16 LEd.2d 1034. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Bennett v. Texas
green
1 sentence1984Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 236 N.E.2d 597 ; Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591 , 199 N.E.2d 102 , cert. denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1013 , 86 S.Ct. 1926 , 16 LEd.2d 1034. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Groce v. State
green
2 sentences1984Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 236 N.E.2d 597 ; Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591 , 199 N.E.2d 102 , cert. denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1013 , 86 S.Ct. 1926 , 16 LEd.2d 1034. 1984Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 236 N.E.2d 597 ; Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591 , 199 N.E.2d 102 , cert. denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1013 , 86 S.Ct. 1926 , 16 LEd.2d 1034. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Robertson
green
2 sentences1975In 1973, the principle of waiver by failure to appeal from an interlocutory order 23 was reaffirmed by the Indiana Supreme Court in State v. Robertson (1973), 260 Ind. 174, 179 , 293 N.E.2d 775 , 778: “Instead of appealing the order immediately, the State chose instead to file an amended complaint. 1975In 1973, the principle of waiver by failure to appeal from an interlocutory order 23 was reaffirmed by the Indiana Supreme Court in State v. Robertson (1973), 260 Ind. 174, 179 , 293 N.E.2d 775 , 778: “Instead of appealing the order immediately, the State chose instead to file an amended complaint. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Cooper v. Overton
neutral
1 sentence1953Blum v. Weatherford, 121 La. 298 ; Rallo v. Heman Construction Co., supra; Richards v. Connell, 45 Neb. 467 , 63 N. W. 915 ; Bowman v. Omaha, 52 Neb. *266 293, 72 N. W. 316 ; Cooper v. Overton, 102 Tenn. 211 ; Barnhart v. Chicago, etc. R. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Blum v. Weatherford & Cary Bros.
neutral
1 sentence1953Blum v. Weatherford, 121 La. 298 ; Rallo v. Heman Construction Co., supra; Richards v. Connell, 45 Neb. 467 , 63 N. W. 915 ; Bowman v. Omaha, 52 Neb. *266 293, 72 N. W. 316 ; Cooper v. Overton, 102 Tenn. 211 ; Barnhart v. Chicago, etc. R. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
City of Omaha v. Bowman
neutral
1 sentence1953Blum v. Weatherford, 121 La. 298 ; Rallo v. Heman Construction Co., supra; Richards v. Connell, 45 Neb. 467 , 63 N. W. 915 ; Bowman v. Omaha, 52 Neb. *266 293, 72 N. W. 316 ; Cooper v. Overton, 102 Tenn. 211 ; Barnhart v. Chicago, etc. R. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Richards v. Connell
neutral
2 sentences1953Blum v. Weatherford, 121 La. 298 ; Rallo v. Heman Construction Co., supra; Richards v. Connell, 45 Neb. 467 , 63 N. W. 915 ; Bowman v. Omaha, 52 Neb. *266 293, 72 N. W. 316 ; Cooper v. Overton, 102 Tenn. 211 ; Barnhart v. Chicago, etc. R. 1953Blum v. Weatherford, 121 La. 298 ; Rallo v. Heman Construction Co., supra; Richards v. Connell, 45 Neb. 467 , 63 N. W. 915 ; Bowman v. Omaha, 52 Neb. *266 293, 72 N. W. 316 ; Cooper v. Overton, 102 Tenn. 211 ; Barnhart v. Chicago, etc. R. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Barnes
neutral
2 sentences1922Co. v. Barnes (1906), 166 Ind. 7 , 76 N. E. 629 , 3 L. 1922Co. v. Barnes (1906), 166 Ind. 7 , 76 N. E. 629 , 3 L. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Schilling v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co.
neutral
2 sentences1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. 1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
American Car & Foundry Co. v. Inzer
neutral
2 sentences1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. 1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. Spiegel
neutral
2 sentences1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. 1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. Croly
green
2 sentences1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. 1913Evansville, etc., Traction Co. v. Spiegel (1912), 49 Ind. App. 412 , 94 N. E. 718 , 97 N. E. 949 ; Schilling v. Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. (1912), 51 Ind. App. 131 , 96 N. E. 167 , 97 N. E. 124 ; Indianapolis, etc., Traction Co. v. Croly (1913), 54 Ind. App. 566 , 96 N. E. 973 , 98 N. E. 1091 ; American Car, etc., Co. v. Inzer (1913), 53 Ind. App. 316 , 101 N. E. 676 . 5. 6. 7. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Cambria Iron Co. v. Union Trust Co.
neutral
1 sentence1901Cambria Iron Co. v. Union Trust Co., supra. In the case at bar every principle of equity, good faith, and fair dealing demands that the claims of appellants should be preferred. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Ryan v. Ray
neutral
1 sentence1899It seems to us that the question now under consideration should be ruled by the case of Ryan v. Ray, 105 Ind. 101 . | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. Custer
neutral
1 sentence1894Co. v. Custer, 128 Ind. 25 , and Replogle v. American Ins. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Kyle v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence1890In the case of Kyle v. Miller, 108 Ind. 90 , it is held that the question as to the public utility of a proposed highway is a question of fact for the jury, and where the evidence is conflicting the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed on appeal, and this principle must rule in this case. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Patterson v. Pope
green
1 sentence1883In Patterson v. Pope, 5 Dana, 241 , the person who asserted •a right of subrogation was a surety on an injunction bond, ■and his position was not like that of a replevin bail under our statute, so that even conceding that the decision is sound, it does not applyto this case. | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Cozine v. Graham & Bleeker
neutral
1 sentence1879This puts the plaintiff' to proof of the agreement at the trial or hearing, and he then must produce a writing.” In the case of Cozine v. Graham, 2 Paige, 177, 181 , it was said: “The rule of pleading on this subject is well settled in the courts of law, and I do not see why the principle of that rule is not equally applicable to this court. | 1 | 1879–1879 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.