Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1861–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Lendersgreen2 sentences1983That being the case, we believe the principle of waiver enunciated in In re Estate of Lenders, 247 Iowa 1205, 1210 , 78 N.W.2d 536, 539 (1956), applies. 1983That being the case, we believe the principle of waiver enunciated in In re Estate of Lenders, 247 Iowa 1205, 1210 , 78 N.W.2d 536, 539 (1956), applies. | 2 | 2 |
Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Moormangreen2 sentences2011Iowa Supreme Ct. Bd. of Prof'l Ethics & Conduct v. Moorman, 683 N.W.2d 549, 553 (Iowa 2004). 2006Moorman, 683 N.W.2d at 553 . | 1 | 3 |
Hernandez v. Mesagreen1 sentence2022See Hernandez v. Mesa, 140 S. Ct. 735, 748 (2020) (“[T]he traditional way in which civil litigation addressed abusive conduct by . . . officers was by subjecting them to liability for common-law torts.”); Jaffe, 77 Harv. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maygreen2 sentences2017In State v. May, 20 Iowa 305, 308 (1866), the court stated while possessing “liquor as an article of traffic is prohibited, and is liable when kept as such, to be seized and destroyed, nevertheless, until this is done, it is in its essential nature property” and “it is a principle or rule of property, as old as the common law itself, that the possession of one is good against all others, who cannot show a better right of possession.” The court held, just as “he who steals a stolen article of property from a thief, may himself be convicted notwithstanding the criminality of the possession by hi 2017In State v. May, 20 Iowa 305, 308 (1866), the court stated while possessing “liquor as an article of traffic is prohibited, and is liable when kept as such, to be seized and destroyed, nevertheless, until this is done, it is in its essential nature property” and “it is a principle or rule of property, as old as the common law itself, that the possession of one is good against all others, who cannot show a better right of possession.” The court held, just as “he who steals a stolen article of property from a thief, may himself be convicted notwithstanding the criminality of the possession by hi | 1 | 1 |
IOWA S. CT. ATTY. DISC. BD. v. Irelandgreen1 sentence2014“Our past sanctions in cases where neglect was the principal violation have generally ranged from a public reprimand to a six-month suspension.” Humphrey, 812 N.W.2d at 666 ; accord Ireland, 723 N.W.2d at 442 (“When neglect of client matters is the principle violation, we have observed that the discipline generally falls within the range of a public reprimand to a six-month suspension.”). | 1 | 1 |
Tiffany v. County Board of Review Ex Rel. Greene Countygreen1 sentence1986See Tiffany v. County Board of Review, *151 188 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Iowa 1971); James Black Dry Goods Co. v. Board of Review, 260 Iowa 1269, 1276 , 151 N.W.2d 534, 538 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
JAMES BLACK DRY GOODS COMPANY v. Board of Reviewgreen2 sentences1986See Tiffany v. County Board of Review, *151 188 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Iowa 1971); James Black Dry Goods Co. v. Board of Review, 260 Iowa 1269, 1276 , 151 N.W.2d 534, 538 (1967). 1986See Tiffany v. County Board of Review, *151 188 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Iowa 1971); James Black Dry Goods Co. v. Board of Review, 260 Iowa 1269, 1276 , 151 N.W.2d 534, 538 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maysgreen1 sentence1977State v. Mays, 204 N.W.2d 862, 865 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cameron, 254 Iowa 505, 509 , 117 N.W.2d 816, 818 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cameronred2 sentences1977State v. Mays, 204 N.W.2d 862, 865 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cameron, 254 Iowa 505, 509 , 117 N.W.2d 816, 818 (1962). 1977State v. Mays, 204 N.W.2d 862, 865 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cameron, 254 Iowa 505, 509 , 117 N.W.2d 816, 818 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Dillon
green
1 sentence2017“Today the rule is universal that by prohibiting possession of an item, the government does not license criminals to take it by force or stealth from other criminals.” People v. Dillon, 668 P.2d 697 , 704 n.5 (Cal. 1983). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Bryan J. Humphrey
green
1 sentence2014“Our past sanctions in cases where neglect was the principal violation have generally ranged from a public reprimand to a six-month suspension.” Humphrey, 812 N.W.2d at 666 ; accord Ireland, 723 N.W.2d at 442 (“When neglect of client matters is the principle violation, we have observed that the discipline generally falls within the range of a public reprimand to a six-month suspension.”). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Vachon v. State
green
2 sentences1998Cf. Vachon v. State, 514 N.W.2d 442 (Iowa 1994) (affirming summary judgment for the defendant on statute-of-limitations grounds, despite the plaintiffs claim that statute did not begin until he received a doctor’s report that alerted him to the defendant’s possible negligence). 1998Cf. Vachon v. State, 514 N.W.2d 442 (Iowa 1994) (affirming summary judgment for the defendant on statute-of-limitations grounds, despite the plaintiff's claim that statute did not begin until he received a doctor's report that alerted him to the defendant's possible negligence). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Shontz v. Iowa Employment Security Commission
green
1 sentence1982The second line of cases “supports the principle that when factors or circumstances directly connected with employment aggravate or cause illness or injury to an employee which makes it impossible for him to continue in the employment, quitting for this reason is for good cause attributable to the employer, even though the employer is free from fault.” Shontz, 248 N.W.2d at 91 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission
green
2 sentences1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. 1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller
green
2 sentences1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. 1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission
green
2 sentences1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. 1976McComber v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 254 Iowa 957 , 119 N.W.2d 792 (1963) (claimant worked with woolen materials to which she developed an allergy); Raffety v. Iowa Employment Security Commission, 247 Iowa 896 , 76 N.W.2d 787 (1956) (claimant contracted jaundice attributed to an on-the-job back injury); Forrest Park Sanitarium v. Miller, 233 Iowa 1341 , 11 N.W.2d 582 (1943) (claimant nurse developed nervous condition when moved from day to night shift); Bussmann Mfg. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Neff
green
2 sentences1973State v. Neff, 228 Iowa 383 , 291 N.W. 415 ; Ritter v. City of Fort Madison, 212 Iowa 564 , 234 N.W. 814 . 1973State v. Neff, 228 Iowa 383 , 291 N.W. 415 ; Ritter v. City of Fort Madison, 212 Iowa 564 , 234 N.W. 814 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Ritter v. City of Fort Madison
green
2 sentences1973State v. Neff, 228 Iowa 383 , 291 N.W. 415 ; Ritter v. City of Fort Madison, 212 Iowa 564 , 234 N.W. 814 . 1973State v. Neff, 228 Iowa 383 , 291 N.W. 415 ; Ritter v. City of Fort Madison, 212 Iowa 564 , 234 N.W. 814 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence1973State v. Smith, 195 N.W.2d at 675 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Arnold v. Arnold
green
2 sentences1969We do not recognize this principle. * * * [Citing authorities]” Arnold v. Arnold, supra, 257 Iowa at 434 , 133 N.W.2d at 56 . 1969We do not recognize this principle. * * * [Citing authorities]” Arnold v. Arnold, supra, 257 Iowa at 434 , 133 N.W.2d at 56 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Lovrien v. Fitzgerald
green
2 sentences1966Lovrien v. Fitzgerald, 245 Iowa 1325, 1330 , 66 N.W.2d 458, 462 , and citations; 18 Am. 1966Lovrien v. Fitzgerald, 245 Iowa 1325, 1330 , 66 N.W.2d 458, 462 , and citations; 18 Am. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Montgomery v. City of Des Moines
neutral
1 sentence1932Montgomery v. City of Des Moines, 190 Iowa 705 . | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Leach v. Iowa State Bank of Atlantic
neutral
1 sentence1928Bank, supra; Whitcomb v. Carpenter, 134 Iowa 227 ; Leach v. Iowa State Bank of *1073 Atlantic, 202 Iowa 887 ; 26 Ruling Case Law 1358, Section 221; Board of Com. v. Strawn, 157 Fed. (6th Circuit) 49; In re Bolognesi & Co., 254 Fed. (2d Circuit) 770; In re Ballard, 279 Fed. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Whitcomb v. Carpenter
green
1 sentence1928Bank, supra; Whitcomb v. Carpenter, 134 Iowa 227 ; Leach v. Iowa State Bank of *1073 Atlantic, 202 Iowa 887 ; 26 Ruling Case Law 1358, Section 221; Board of Com. v. Strawn, 157 Fed. (6th Circuit) 49; In re Bolognesi & Co., 254 Fed. (2d Circuit) 770; In re Ballard, 279 Fed. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Thompson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
neutral
1 sentence1890In this connection, see the following cases: Manville v. Telegraph Co., 37 Iowa, 214 ; Thompson v. Telegraph Co., 64 Wis. 531 ; 25 N. W. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Manville v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
neutral
1 sentence1890In this connection, see the following cases: Manville v. Telegraph Co., 37 Iowa, 214 ; Thompson v. Telegraph Co., 64 Wis. 531 ; 25 N. W. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Lawrence v. Housatonic Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1875The principle of the instruction given was approved by this court in Collins v. The City of Council Bluffs, 32 Iowa, 324 , (329.) See also Lawrence v. Housatonic R’y Co. 29 Conn., 390 ; Stover v. Bluehill, 51 Maine, 439. | 1 | 1875–1875 |
Greenleaf v. Illinois Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1875The principle of this instruction is recognized in Greenleaf v. Illinois Central R’y, 29 Iowa, 14, (48.) See also, Allen v. Willand, 57 Penn., 347 ; C. & P. R. | 1 | 1875–1875 |
Collins v. City of Council Bluffs
green
1 sentence1875The principle of the instruction given was approved by this court in Collins v. The City of Council Bluffs, 32 Iowa, 324 , (329.) See also Lawrence v. Housatonic R’y Co. 29 Conn., 390 ; Stover v. Bluehill, 51 Maine, 439. | 1 | 1875–1875 |
Curtis v. Millard & Co.
green
1 sentence1864This principle or rule of property is distinctly settled in the case of Curtis v. Millard & Co., 14 Iowa, 128 , where the doetrine upon this subject is discussed, as well as by the several authorities therein cited. | 1 | 1864–1864 |
| Walters v. Washington Ins. neutral | 1 | 1861–1861 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.