Your MCP token and copy-and-paste setup for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and the rest are on the install page — filled in with your real credentials while you are signed in.
Delete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant — emailed to you with setup instructions, and always available under that icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
George Ready, II v. RWI Transportation, LLCgreen1 sentence2019See Ready v. RWI Transp., LLC, 203 So. 3d 590, 594 (¶ 9) (Miss. 2016) (“While duty and causation both involve a foreseeability analysis, duty is an issue of law, and causation is generally a matter for the jury.” (citing W. | 1 | 1 |
Robison v. McDowellgreen1 sentence2016Robison, 247 So.2d at 686. *595 The requirements of the law as to foreseeability can probably be better expressed in terms of how far the responsibility of an actor extends. | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Boydgreen1 sentence2012Simpson, 880 So.2d at 1051 (¶ 14) (holding plaintiff can prove foreseeability by showing “the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of the assailant’s violent nature”). | 1 | 1 |
Matthews v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2005To confuse matters even more, this Court has quoted with approval the following provision from a legal treatise: “If the actor’s conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about harm to another, the fact that the actor neither foresaw nor should have foreseen the extent of the harm or the manner in which it occurred does not prevent him from being liable.” Section 435, Restatement, Law of Torts. 22 Matthews v. Thompson, 231 Miss. 258 , 95 So. 2d 438, 448 (1957). 2005To confuse matters even more, this Court has quoted with approval the following provision from a legal treatise: “If the actor’s conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about harm to another, the fact that the actor neither foresaw nor should have foreseen the extent of the harm or the manner in which it occurred does not prevent him from being liable.” Section 435, Restatement, Law of Torts. 22 Matthews v. Thompson, 231 Miss. 258 , 95 So. 2d 438, 448 (1957). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Laborers Local 17 Health And Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004As a general rule, proximate cause requires that both be present" Id. at 236 . 2004Laborers Local 17, 191 F.3d at 235-36 . ¶ 23. | 2 | 2001–2004 |
Kilgore v. Fuller
green
1 sentence2021“It would be unfair to require under the foreseeability test that the initial child- support award include anticipated future increased expenses.” Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Varner v. Varner
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Bloodworth
green
1 sentence2012Moreover, the foreseeability inquiry is not governed by hindsight, "weighed on jewelers’ scales, nor calculated by the expert mind of the philosopher,” but instead focuses on “what is likely to happen, — from cause to probable effect.” Mauney, 9 So.2d at 781 (quoting Bloodworth, 145 So. at 336 ). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
green
2 sentences1988The due process analysis of personal jurisdiction has one other component, a foreseeability test deriving from World-wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. *1027 286, 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). 1988The due process analysis of personal jurisdiction has one other component, a foreseeability test deriving from World-wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. *1027 286, 100 S.Ct. 559 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Hanson v. Denckla
green
1 sentence1984In Hansen v. Denckla, supra, the Supreme Court has said that it is fair that a non-resident defendant be subject to an adjudication of his important rights and duties in the forum state where that defendant has "purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state". 357 U.S. at 253 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Green v. Hodges
neutral
2 sentences1971Under the cited cases and Green v. Hodges, 227 Miss. 475 , 86 So.2d 335 , Sug. of Error and Motion to Dismiss Appeal Overruled 87 So.2d 87 (1956), the foreseeability rule is not satisfied. 1971Under the cited cases and Green v. Hodges, 227 Miss. 475 , 86 So.2d 335 , Sug. of Error and Motion to Dismiss Appeal Overruled 87 So.2d 87 (1956), the foreseeability rule is not satisfied. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.