compliance standard in Montana

12 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1907–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
Petty v. Flathead County Board of County Commissionersgreen mont · 1988 · cited in 2 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009Yurczyk v. Yellowstone Co., 2004 MT 3, ¶ 22 , 319 Mont. 169 , 83 P.3d 266 , citing Petty v. Flathead City Bd. of City Commrs., 231 Mont. 428, 431 , 754 P.2d 496, 498-99 (1988). 2009Yurczyk v. Yellowstone Co., 2004 MT 3, ¶ 22 , 319 Mont. 169 , 83 P.3d 266 , citing Petty v. Flathead City Bd. of City Commrs., 231 Mont. 428, 431 , 754 P.2d 496, 498-99 (1988).	2	2
Rush v. Lewis & Clark Countygreen mont · 1908 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 2 sentences 2025Often, very valuable property is lost for a mere pittance.” Moran, 261 Mont. at 4 482-83, 863 P.2d at 398 ; see also Rush v. Lewis & Clark Cnty., 36 Mont. 566, 569 , 93 P. 943, 944 (1908) (“[T]he tax almost always bears a very small proportion to the value of the property sold. . . . [I]t has generally been held that proceedings on tax sales should strictly comply with the statute.”). ¶8 This case is unique in that there was an attempt to redeem, thus presenting an entirely separate question from those cases addressing whether strict compliance was achieved by the party seeking to obtain the t 2025Often, very valuable property is lost for a mere pittance.” Moran, 261 Mont. at 4 482-83, 863 P.2d at 398 ; see also Rush v. Lewis & Clark Cnty., 36 Mont. 566, 569 , 93 P. 943, 944 (1908) (“[T]he tax almost always bears a very small proportion to the value of the property sold. . . . [I]t has generally been held that proceedings on tax sales should strictly comply with the statute.”). ¶8 This case is unique in that there was an attempt to redeem, thus presenting an entirely separate question from those cases addressing whether strict compliance was achieved by the party seeking to obtain the t	1	1
Formicove, Inc. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.green mont · 1983 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021 2 sentences 2021Our decision in Pope is not manifestly wrong ¶13 Stare decisis is a fundamental doctrine that “reflects our concerns for stability, predictability, and equal treatment[.]” Formicove, Inc. v. Burlington N., 207 Mont. 189, 194 , 673 P.2d 469, 472 (citations omitted). 2021Our decision in Pope is not manifestly wrong ¶13 Stare decisis is a fundamental doctrine that “reflects our concerns for stability, predictability, and equal treatment[.]” Formicove, Inc. v. Burlington N., 207 Mont. 189, 194 , 673 P.2d 469, 472 (citations omitted).	1	1
Bridger Canyon Property Owners' Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning Commission for the Bridger Canyon Zoning Districtgreen mont · 1995 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012See Bridger Canyon Property Owners’ Ass’n v. Planning & Zoning Comm’n, 270 Mont. 160, 170 , 890 P.2d 1268, 1274 (1995) (stating that “the propositions established in Little are applicable” to Part 1 zoning). ¶18 HSG argues that the zoning regulations do not substantially comply with the Growth Policy because the zoning board “disregard[ed] the actual use of the land.” HSG points out that the County’s staff report, made at the PZ Commission’s request, noted the existence of five gravel pits in and around the transitional area encompassing District 43. 2012See Bridger Canyon Property Owners’ Ass’n v. Planning & Zoning Comm’n, 270 Mont. 160, 170 , 890 P.2d 1268, 1274 (1995) (stating that “the propositions established in Little are applicable” to Part 1 zoning). ¶18 HSG argues that the zoning regulations do not substantially comply with the Growth Policy because the zoning board “disregard[ed] the actual use of the land.” HSG points out that the County’s staff report, made at the PZ Commission’s request, noted the existence of five gravel pits in and around the transitional area encompassing District 43.	1	1
United States v. Z. T. Kennedygreen ca5 · 1977 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010"That the clerk's office did not even attempt to follow the law is more than a mere technical irregularity and evades the substantial compliance standard." Norquay directs our attention to State v. LaMere, 2000 MT 45, ¶ 57 , 298 Mont. 358 , 2 P.3d 204 ("A substantial failure to comply encompasses a statutory violation that affects the `random nature or objectivity of the selection process.'" (quoting United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 612 (5th Cir.1977))), and argues that the Clerk's error in selecting Norquay's jury panel constitutes structural error. 2010“That the clerk’s office did not even attempt to follow the law is more than a mere technical irregularity and evades the substantial compliance standard.” Norquay directs our attention to State v. LaMere, 2000 MT 45, ¶ 57 , 298 Mont. 358 , 2 P.3d 204 (“A substantial failure to comply encompasses a statutory violation that affects the ‘random nature or objectivity of the selection process.’ ” (quoting United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 612 (5th Cir. 1977))), and argues that the Clerk’s error in selecting Norquay’s jury panel constitutes structural error.	1	1
Solberg v. County of Yellowstonegreen mont · 1983 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	1
Rambur v. DIEHL LUMBER COMPANYgreen mont · 1964 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998	1	1
Gregory v. City of Forsythgreen mont · 1980 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998	1	1
Dawson v. Saadagreen fla · 1992 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (27)

Case	Cited	Years
Yurczyk v. Yellowstone County green mont · 2004 2 sentences 2009Yurczyk v. Yellowstone Co., 2004 MT 3, ¶ 22 , 319 Mont. 169 , 83 P.3d 266 , citing Petty v. Flathead City Bd. of City Commrs., 231 Mont. 428, 431 , 754 P.2d 496, 498-99 (1988). 2009Yurczyk v. Yellowstone Co., 2004 MT 3, ¶ 22 , 319 Mont. 169 , 83 P.3d 266 , citing Petty v. Flathead City Bd. of City Commrs., 231 Mont. 428, 431 , 754 P.2d 496, 498-99 (1988).	2	2009–2009
Moran v. Robbin green mont · 1993 2 sentences 2025Often, very valuable property is lost for a mere pittance.” Moran, 261 Mont. at 4 482-83, 863 P.2d at 398 ; see also Rush v. Lewis & Clark Cnty., 36 Mont. 566, 569 , 93 P. 943, 944 (1908) (“[T]he tax almost always bears a very small proportion to the value of the property sold. . . . [I]t has generally been held that proceedings on tax sales should strictly comply with the statute.”). ¶8 This case is unique in that there was an attempt to redeem, thus presenting an entirely separate question from those cases addressing whether strict compliance was achieved by the party seeking to obtain the t 2025Often, very valuable property is lost for a mere pittance.” Moran, 261 Mont. at 4 482-83, 863 P.2d at 398 ; see also Rush v. Lewis & Clark Cnty., 36 Mont. 566, 569 , 93 P. 943, 944 (1908) (“[T]he tax almost always bears a very small proportion to the value of the property sold. . . . [I]t has generally been held that proceedings on tax sales should strictly comply with the statute.”). ¶8 This case is unique in that there was an attempt to redeem, thus presenting an entirely separate question from those cases addressing whether strict compliance was achieved by the party seeking to obtain the t	1	2025–2025
State v. LaMere green mont · 2000 2 sentences 2010“That the clerk’s office did not even attempt to follow the law is more than a mere technical irregularity and evades the substantial compliance standard.” Norquay directs our attention to State v. LaMere, 2000 MT 45, ¶ 57 , 298 Mont. 358 , 2 P.3d 204 (“A substantial failure to comply encompasses a statutory violation that affects the ‘random nature or objectivity of the selection process.’ ” (quoting United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 612 (5th Cir. 1977))), and argues that the Clerk’s error in selecting Norquay’s jury panel constitutes structural error. 2010“That the clerk’s office did not even attempt to follow the law is more than a mere technical irregularity and evades the substantial compliance standard.” Norquay directs our attention to State v. LaMere, 2000 MT 45, ¶ 57 , 298 Mont. 358 , 2 P.3d 204 (“A substantial failure to comply encompasses a statutory violation that affects the ‘random nature or objectivity of the selection process.’ ” (quoting United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 612 (5th Cir. 1977))), and argues that the Clerk’s error in selecting Norquay’s jury panel constitutes structural error.	1	2010–2010
Little v. Board of County Commissioners green mont · 1981 2 sentences 2006Little, 193 Mont. at 353 , 631 P.2d at 1293 . 2006Little, 193 Mont. at 353 , 631 P.2d at 1293 .	1	2006–2006
State v. Egelhoff green mont · 1995 2 sentences 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ). 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ).	1	2002–2002
Teague v. Lane green scotus · 1989 2 sentences 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ). 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ).	1	2002–2002
Montana v. Egelhoff green scotus · 1996 2 sentences 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ). 2002LaMere , ¶¶ 32, 35. ¶18 Finally, the State contends that LaMere cannot be retroactively applied to Robbins in a collateral proceeding such as postconviction relief based on the test for retroactive application set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Teague v. Lane (1989), 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 , and followed by this Court in State v. Egelhoff (1995), 272 Mont. 114 , 900 P.2d 260 (rev’d on other grounds by Montana v. Egelhoff (1996), 518 U.S. 37 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 ).	1	2002–2002
State Ex Rel. Henningsen v. District Court of the Second Judicial District green mont · 1959 2 sentences 2000Henningson v. District Court (1959), 136 Mont. 354, 360 , 348 P.2d 143, 146 . ¶67 The substantial compliance standard is appropriate, in our view, as a matter of public policy. 2000Henningson v. District Court (1959), 136 Mont. 354, 360 , 348 P.2d 143, 146 . ¶67 The substantial compliance standard is appropriate, in our view, as a matter of public policy.	1	2000–2000
State v. Groom green mont · 1914 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
State v. Miller neutral mont · 1914 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
State v. Diedtman green · 1920 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
State v. Taylor green mont · 1975 2 sentences 2000Taylor, 168 Mont. at 146 , 542 P.2d at 102 . 2000Taylor, 168 Mont. at 146 , 542 P.2d at 102 .	1	2000–2000
Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation District green mont · 1981 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
United States v. Royal green ca1 · 1999 2 sentences 2000Royal, 174 F.3d at 11 . 2000Royal, 174 F.3d at 11 .	1	2000–2000
State v. Hay neutral mont · 1948 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
Glasser v. United States green scotus · 1942 2 sentences 2000For this Court has long recognized “the insistence with which the people of this country maintain the right of trial by jury.” Clark, 86 Mont. at 512 , 284 R at 267. ¶68 The rationale underlying the substantial compliance standard, then, is that any material deviation from statutory procedures designed to ensure that jury selection results in “trial by a representative group are undermining processes weakening the institution of jury trial, and should be sturdily resisted.” Glasser, 315 U.S. at 86 , 62 S.Ct. at 472 , 86 L.Ed. at 707 . 2000For this Court has long recognized “the insistence with which the people of this country maintain the right of trial by jury.” Clark, 86 Mont. at 512 , 284 R at 267. ¶68 The rationale underlying the substantial compliance standard, then, is that any material deviation from statutory procedures designed to ensure that jury selection results in “trial by a representative group are undermining processes weakening the institution of jury trial, and should be sturdily resisted.” Glasser, 315 U.S. at 86 , 62 S.Ct. at 472 , 86 L.Ed. at 707 .	1	2000–2000
State v. Deeds neutral mont · 1957 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
State Ex Rel. Clark v. District Court green mont · 1930 2 sentences 2000For this Court has long recognized "the insistence with which the people of this country maintain the right of trial by jury." Clark, 86 Mont. at 512 , 284 P. at 267 . ¶ 68 The rationale underlying the substantial compliance standard, then, is that any material deviation from statutory procedures designed to ensure that jury selection results in "trial by a representative group are undermining processes weakening the institution of jury trial, and should be sturdily resisted." Glasser, 315 U.S. at 86 , 62 S.Ct. at 472 , 86 L.Ed. at 707 . 2000For this Court has long recognized “the insistence with which the people of this country maintain the right of trial by jury.” Clark, 86 Mont. at 512 , 284 R at 267. ¶68 The rationale underlying the substantial compliance standard, then, is that any material deviation from statutory procedures designed to ensure that jury selection results in “trial by a representative group are undermining processes weakening the institution of jury trial, and should be sturdily resisted.” Glasser, 315 U.S. at 86 , 62 S.Ct. at 472 , 86 L.Ed. at 707 .	1	2000–2000
Kennon v. Gilmer neutral mont · 1882	1	2000–2000
State v. Tighe green · 1903 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
Duncan v. Louisiana green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 2000Duncan, 391 U.S. at 156 , 88 S.Ct. at 1451 , 20 L.Ed.2d at 500 . 2000Duncan, 391 U.S. at 156 , 88 S.Ct. at 1451 , 20 L.Ed.2d at 500 .	1	2000–2000
State v. Porter green mont · 1952 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
State v. Landry green mont · 1903 2 sentences 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1 2000See generally Solberg v. County of Yellowstone (1983), 203 Mont. 79 , 659 P.2d 290 ; Dvorak v. Huntley Project Irrigation Dist. (1981), 196 Mont. 167 , 639 P.2d 62 ; State v. Deeds (1957), 130 Mont. 503 , 305 P.2d 321 ; State v. Porter (1952), 125 Mont. 503 , 242 P.2d 984 ; State v. Hay (1948), 120 Mont. 573 , 194 P.2d 232 ; State v. Diedtman (1920), 58 Mont. 13 , 190 P. 117 ; State v. Miller (1914), 49 Mont. 360 , 141 P. 860 ; State v. Groom (1914), 49 Mont. 354 , 141 P. 858 ; State v. Landry (1903), 29 Mont. 218 , 74 P. 418 ; State v. Tighe (1903), 27 Mont. 327 , 71 P. 3; Kennon v. Gilmer (1	1	2000–2000
Taylor v. Louisiana green scotus · 1975 2 sentences 2000Although the statutory procedures for jury selection are designed to protect the constitutional, fair cross-section guarantee, the substantial compliance standard and the constitutional test have as their object of inquiry entirely different subject matters. ¶63 To illustrate, under Taylor and Duren , the fair cross-section test is designed to ensure that “ ‘jury wheels, pools of names, panels, or venires from which juries are drawn [do] not systematically exclude distinctive groups in the community and thereby fail to be reasonably representative thereof.’ ’’Duren, 439 U.S. at 363-64 , 99 S.C 2000Although the statutory procedures for jury selection are designed to protect the constitutional, fair cross-section guarantee, the substantial compliance standard and the constitutional test have as their object of inquiry entirely different subject matters. ¶63 To illustrate, under Taylor and Duren , the fair cross-section test is designed to ensure that “ ‘jury wheels, pools of names, panels, or venires from which juries are drawn [do] not systematically exclude distinctive groups in the community and thereby fail to be reasonably representative thereof.’ ’’Duren, 439 U.S. at 363-64 , 99 S.C	1	2000–2000
Duren v. Missouri green scotus · 1979	1	2000–2000
Bourjaily v. United States green scotus · 1987 2 sentences 2000I Introduction: Diversity Begets Impartiality ¶28 “Our notions of what a proper jury is have developed in harmony with our basic concepts of a democratic society and a representative government.” Glasser v. United States (1942), 315 U.S. 60, 85 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 472 , 86 L.Ed. 680, 707 , superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized by Bourjaily v. United States (1987), 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 . 2000I Introduction: Diversity Begets Impartiality ¶28 “Our notions of what a proper jury is have developed in harmony with our basic concepts of a democratic society and a representative government.” Glasser v. United States (1942), 315 U.S. 60, 85 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 472 , 86 L.Ed. 680, 707 , superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized by Bourjaily v. United States (1987), 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 .	1	2000–2000
Reeve v. City of Oshkosh neutral wis · 1873	1	1907–1907

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 1-2-101 (3) MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 76-2-205 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 186 (1892–2026) OH 184 (1896–2026) TX 123 (1878–2026) WA 110 (1931–2026) IL 109 (1874–2026) NJ 87 (1924–2026) IA 79 (1885–2025) NY 73 (1845–2026) MS 71 (1870–2026) MI 60 (1887–2025) KY 52 (1921–2026) PA 52 (1859–2025) MO 49 (1890–2018) UT 49 (1988–2024) CO 36 (1890–2026) GA 36 (1898–2025) IN 31 (1870–2020) KS 31 (1890–2025) MD 29 (1909–2019) CT 27 (1926–2024) LA 26 (1916–2024) AL 26 (1909–1995) FL 26 (1893–2024) TN 26 (1967–2026) OK 21 (1911–2024) AR 19 (1906–2021) MN 19 (1892–2016) AZ 17 (1934–2026) WI 14 (1958–2026) NV 13 (1923–2023) VA 13 (1891–2025) DC 13 (1948–2024) MT 12 (1907–2025) NE 12 (1898–2020) NM 12 (1987–2019) SD 11 (1996–2024) OR 10 (1909–2026) NC 10 (1896–2020) HI 9 (1912–2006) ME 7 (1982–2016) MA 7 (1915–2023) WV 7 (1921–1999) VT 6 (1908–2018) WY 6 (1921–2005) ND 5 (1898–1995) AK 5 (1977–2021) SC 5 (1929–2007) DE 4 (1971–2015) ID 4 (1931–2023) NH 3 (1989–2020) PR 2 (1929–1930) VI 2 (2000–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check