Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1923–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gregory Scott Bigelow, Vincent Lima, and Anthony W. Vaughan, Cross-Appelleesgreen1 sentence1998See Bigelow, 914 F.2d at 972 . 8 The State acknowledged at oral argument that when a prosecutor is faced with a witness inquiry, it is appropriate for the prosecutor to present the witness with three options: to meet with the defense investigator, to meet with the investigator in the presence of someone from the prosecutor's office, or to decline to meet with anyone from the defense. | 1 | 1 |
Estes v. Texasgreen2 sentences1989Kentucky v. Stincer, supra, 4903; cf. Pointer v. Texas, supra, 406-407; Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 , 88 S. Ct. 1318 , 20 L. 1989Kentucky v. Stincer, supra, 4903; cf. Pointer v. Texas, supra, 406-407; Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 , 88 S. Ct. 1318 , 20 L. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Murchison.green1 sentence1978Thus sec. 972.08, Stats., is not applicable to the case at bar. [18] The State notes that the Court in Murchison found that the one-man grand jury considered himself a part of the prosecution. 349 U.S. 133, 137, n. 8 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mayo
green
2 sentences2025“Wisconsin’s harmless error rule … prohibits reversal in those [criminal] cases for errors that do not affect the substantial rights of a defendant.” Nelson, 355 Wis. 2d 722, ¶29 . 10 No. 2024AP440-CR As the beneficiary of the error, the State bears the burden of proving “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶47 , 301 Wis. 2d 642 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citations omitted). ¶21 As noted above, the State argues that the violation of Aiden’s right to be physically present at his competency hearing did not affect h 2025“Wisconsin’s harmless error rule … prohibits reversal in those [criminal] cases for errors that do not affect the substantial rights of a defendant.” Nelson, 355 Wis. 2d 722, ¶29 . 10 No. 2024AP440-CR As the beneficiary of the error, the State bears the burden of proving “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶47 , 301 Wis. 2d 642 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citations omitted). ¶21 As noted above, the State argues that the violation of Aiden’s right to be physically present at his competency hearing did not affect h | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Angelica C. Nelson
green
1 sentence2025“Wisconsin’s harmless error rule … prohibits reversal in those [criminal] cases for errors that do not affect the substantial rights of a defendant.” Nelson, 355 Wis. 2d 722, ¶29 . 10 No. 2024AP440-CR As the beneficiary of the error, the State bears the burden of proving “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained.” State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶47 , 301 Wis. 2d 642 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citations omitted). ¶21 As noted above, the State argues that the violation of Aiden’s right to be physically present at his competency hearing did not affect h | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Barber v. Page
green
2 sentences1989Kentucky v. Stincer, supra, 4903; cf. Pointer v. Texas, supra, 406-407; Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 , 88 S. Ct. 1318 , 20 L. 1989Kentucky v. Stincer, supra, 4903; cf. Pointer v. Texas, supra, 406-407; Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 , 88 S. Ct. 1318 , 20 L. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Hall
green
1 sentence1986These requirements are discussed in Hall, 65 Wis. 2d at 28-32 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences1984In the later case of State v. Harris, 92 Wis. 2d 836, 841 , 285 N.W.2d 917 (Ct. App. 1979), the witness whose privilege was being challenged had pled guilty and had been sentenced. 1984In the later case of State v. Harris, 92 Wis. 2d 836, 841 , 285 N.W.2d 917 (Ct. App. 1979), the witness whose privilege was being challenged had pled guilty and had been sentenced. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Price v. State
green
2 sentences1976Price v. State (1967), 37 Wis.2d 117, 126 , 154 N.W.2d 222 , cert. den. 391 U.S. 908 . 1976Price v. State (1967), 37 Wis.2d 117, 126 , 154 N.W.2d 222 , cert. den. 391 U.S. 908 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Haines v. Frye
neutral
1 sentence1976Price v. State (1967), 37 Wis.2d 117, 126 , 154 N.W.2d 222 , cert. den. 391 U.S. 908 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Wolke v. Fleming
green
2 sentences1974Wolke v. Fleming (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 606, 618 , 129 N. W. 2d 841 ; State v. Davidson (1943), 242 Wis. 406 , 8 N. W. 2d 275 . 1974Wolke v. Fleming (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 606, 618 , 129 N. W. 2d 841 ; State v. Davidson (1943), 242 Wis. 406 , 8 N. W. 2d 275 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Davidson
green
2 sentences1974Wolke v. Fleming (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 606, 618 , 129 N. W. 2d 841 ; State v. Davidson (1943), 242 Wis. 406 , 8 N. W. 2d 275 . 1974Wolke v. Fleming (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 606, 618 , 129 N. W. 2d 841 ; State v. Davidson (1943), 242 Wis. 406 , 8 N. W. 2d 275 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Page Co. v. MacDonald
green
2 sentences1966Again in Page v. Macdonald (1923), 261 U. S. 446 , 43 Sup. Ct. 416, 67 L. 1966Again in Page v. Macdonald (1923), 261 U. S. 446 , 43 Sup. Ct. 416, 67 L. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
State v. Lloyd
green
2 sentences1934State v. Lloyd, 152 Wis. 24 , 139 N. W. 514 . 1934State v. Lloyd, 152 Wis. 24 , 139 N. W. 514 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Byrnes v. Clark
neutral
2 sentences1923Byrnes v. Clark, 57 Wis. 13, 14 N. W. 815 ; Donelson v. Taylor, 8 Pick. 390 ; 30 Am. & Eng. 1923Byrnes v. Clark, 57 Wis. 13, 14 N. W. 815 ; Donelson v. Taylor, 8 Pick. 390 ; 30 Am. & Eng. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.