10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fonvillegreen2 sentences2017See Fonville, 291 Mich App at 384 . 2017See Fonville, 291 Mich App at 384 . | 2 | 2 |
Colorado v. Springgreen2 sentences2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). 2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
Connecticut v. Barrettgreen2 sentences2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). 2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences1993See People v Rodriguez, 192 Mich App 1 ; 480 NW2d 287 (1991); cf. MCL 600.8412; MSA 27A.8412 (waiver of right of appeal from small claims division of district court). 1993See People v Rodriguez, 192 Mich App 1 ; 480 NW2d 287 (1991); cf. MCL 600.8412; MSA 27A.8412 (waiver of right of appeal from small claims division of district court). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Sianggreen1 sentence1982We agree with the majority in Brown v Siang, supra, 104-106, that a more detailed statement of the rights surrounding a trial and the procedures used in arbitration is unnecessary to a voluntary waiver. 1 Finally, plaintiff asks this Court to hold that the medical malpractice arbitration act is unconstitutional as it provides that one member of each *749 three person panel be a hospital administrator or physician. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Daoud
green
1 sentence2020Daoud, 462 Mich at 639 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Shields
green
2 sentences2015This is nearly identical to the trial court’s colloquy in People v Shields, 200 Mich App 554, 560-561 ; 504 NW2d 711 (1993), which this Court deemed sufficient to secure a voluntary waiver. 2015This is nearly identical to the trial court’s colloquy in People v Shields, 200 Mich App 554, 560-561 ; 504 NW2d 711 (1993), which this Court deemed sufficient to secure a voluntary waiver. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Colorado v. Connelly
green
2 sentences2000The preponderance test employed by the majority springs from Colorado v Connelly, 479 US 157, 168 ; 107 S Ct 515 ; 93 L Ed 2d 473 (1986), a United States Supreme Court case discussing the voluntary waiver of constitutional rights protected by Miranda . 2000The preponderance test employed by the majority springs from Colorado v Connelly, 479 US 157, 168 ; 107 S Ct 515 ; 93 L Ed 2d 473 (1986), a United States Supreme Court case discussing the voluntary waiver of constitutional rights protected by Miranda . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Johnson v. Zerbst
green
2 sentences2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). 2000Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see, also, Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 581 , 107 S.Ct. 851 , 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987) (Marshall, J., dissenting), and Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 531 , 107 S.Ct. 828 , 93 L.Ed.2d 920 (1987) (Brennan, J., concurring). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Brannan
neutral
2 sentences1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). 1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). 1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Brannan
green
2 sentences1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). 1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
PEOPLE Ex Rel WAYNE PROSECUTOR v. RECORDER’S COURT JUDGE
green
2 sentences1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). 1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Lewis
green
2 sentences1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). 1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
LaPuma v. United States
green
1 sentence1982In support of his position defendant cites People ex rel Wayne Prosecutor v Recorder’s Court Judge, 79 Mich App 495 ; 261 NW2d 63 (1977), cert den 436 US 958 (1978), People v Brannan, 64 Mich App 374 ; 236 NW2d 80 (1975), rev’d 406 Mich 104 ; 276 NW2d 14 (1979), People v Lewis, 47 Mich App 450 ; 209 NW2d 450 (1973), and Edwards v Arizona, 451 US 477 ; 101 S Ct 1880 ; 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1974According to People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551 ; 194 NW2d 709 (1972), our Court must examine the *8 entire record and make an independent determination on the question of voluntariness. 1974According to People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551 ; 194 NW2d 709 (1972), our Court must examine the *8 entire record and make an independent determination on the question of voluntariness. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
People v. Whisenant
green
2 sentences1970This case is strikingly similar to the Whisenant case in that although defendant was informed of his right to counsel, “. . . nowhere does it appear (in the record) that he was informed of his right to have counsel, retained and appointed present during questioning and the giving of his statement.” People v. Whisenant (supra, p 437 ). 2 We feel constrained to remand for a Walker hearing on the question of whether there was a voluntary waiver of right to counsel after being fully informed of his right to have such counsel present at questioning in line with Miranda v. Arizona, supra, and the de 1970This case is strikingly similar to the Whisenant case in that although defendant was informed of his right to counsel, "... nowhere does it appear (in the record) that he was informed of his right to have counsel, retained and appointed present during questioning and the giving of his statement." People v. Whisenant (supra, p 437 ). [2] *280 We feel constrained to remand for a Walker hearing on the question of whether there was a voluntary waiver of right to counsel after being fully informed of his right to have such counsel present at questioning in line with Miranda v. Arizona, supra , and | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.