10 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Merricksgreen1 sentence2007See, also, State v. Merricks, 831 So. 2d 156, 160 (Fla. 2002) (“the potential for prejudice is the same, if not greater, when a bailiff, rather than a trial judge, answers a jury’s inquiry directly without notice to and outside the presence of defense counsel and the State”). | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Behgreen2 sentences1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. 1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Watt
green
2 sentences2020We recognize that in State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013), we briefly considered a sufficiency of the evidence argument based on Portsche. 2020We recognize that in State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013), we briefly considered a sufficiency of the evidence argument based on Portsche. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1993In State v. Smith, 213 Neb. 446 , 329 N.W.2d 564 (1983), the Nebraska Supreme Court reminded us of the reason for the policy prohibiting the use of prior uncounseled convictions. 1993In State v. Smith, 213 Neb. 446 , 329 N.W.2d 564 (1983), the Nebraska Supreme Court reminded us of the reason for the policy prohibiting the use of prior uncounseled convictions. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Wever v. State
neutral
2 sentences1990In Wever v. State, 121 Neb. 816 , 238 N.W. 736 (1931), the defendant contended he was deprived of a fair trial because of hissing and applauding on the part of spectators in the courtroom during trial. 1990In Wever v. State, 121 Neb. 816 , 238 N.W. 736 (1931), the defendant contended he was deprived of a fair trial because of hissing and applauding on the part of spectators in the courtroom during trial. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. White
green
2 sentences1979In Nebraska, the harmless error rule is set out in State v. White, 191 Neb. 772 , 217 N. W. 2d 916 (1974). 1979In Nebraska, the harmless error rule is set out in State v. White, 191 Neb. 772 , 217 N. W. 2d 916 (1974). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Bucy v. Hieber
neutral
2 sentences1967In re Estate of Bucy, 150 Neb. 263 , 34 N. W. 2d 265 ; Holyoke v. Sipp, 77 Neb. 394 , 109 N. W. 506 . 1967In re Estate of Bucy, 150 Neb. 263 , 34 N. W. 2d 265 ; Holyoke v. Sipp, 77 Neb. 394 , 109 N. W. 506 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Holyoke v. Sipp
neutral
2 sentences1967In re Estate of Bucy, 150 Neb. 263 , 34 N. W. 2d 265 ; Holyoke v. Sipp, 77 Neb. 394 , 109 N. W. 506 . 1967In re Estate of Bucy, 150 Neb. 263 , 34 N. W. 2d 265 ; Holyoke v. Sipp, 77 Neb. 394 , 109 N. W. 506 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Tempero v. Adams
green
2 sentences1955Therefore, by analogy from Tempero v. Adams, 153 Neb. 331 , 44 N. W. 2d 604 , the maximum legal speed limit at point of accident was 45 miles per hour. 1955Therefore, by analogy from Tempero v. Adams, 153 Neb. 331 , 44 N. W. 2d 604 , the maximum legal speed limit at point of accident was 45 miles per hour. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Wahl v. Cunningham
green
2 sentences1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. 1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Wallace v. . Wallace
green
2 sentences1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. 1949See, Lewis v. Beh, 206 Iowa 281 , 218 N. W. 944 ; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 N. Y. 28 , 109 N. E. 872 ; Wahl v. Cunningham, 320 Mo. 57 , 6 S. W. 2d 576 , 67 A. L. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Jones v. State
neutral
1 sentence1914The next complaint is that, when the court had finished, reading its charge to the jury, it announced to counsel in the presence and hearing of the jury the following language: “The instruction asked by defendant is refused.” This did not constitute reversible error, nor does Jones v. State, 87 Neb. 390 , cited bv defendant, so hold. 6. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Blomgren v. Anderson
neutral
1 sentence1905In Blomgren v. Anderson, 48 Neb. 240 , it was held that, in an action to recover for services rendered under special contract, where the defense alleged that the consideration for such services was the plaintiff’s board and lodging during the period, evidence that at that time a third person in the defendant’s presence and hearing offered to employ the plaintiff at substantial wages for work of the same general character was properly admissible as bearing upon the reasonableness of the claim and in some degree corroborative of the plaintiff’s testimony. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.