7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bondgreen1 sentence2020See Bond, 2015 UT 88, ¶ 49 (quotation simplified). | 1 | 1 |
Delia S. v. Torresgreen2 sentences2004However, in only one of these cases, Delia S. v. Torres, 134 Cal.App.3d 471 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 787 (1982), did the court hold that a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress could be made by an absent third party. 2004However, in only one of these cases, Delia S. v. Torres, 134 Cal.App.3d 471 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 787 (1982), did the court hold that a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress could be made by an absent third party. | 1 | 1 |
Croft Ex Rel. Croft v. Wickergreen2 sentences2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst 2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst | 1 | 1 |
Rd v. Whgreen2 sentences2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst 2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst | 1 | 1 |
Schurk v. Christensengreen2 sentences2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst 2004Seq, eg., Croft by Croft v. Wicker, 737 P.2d 789, 792-98 (Alaska 1987) (allowing recovery where hous-eguest molested plaintiffs' daughter although plaintiffs did not witness actual incident); Schurk v. Christensen, 80 Wash.2d 652 , 497 P.2d 937, 940-41 (1972) (relaxing the presence requirement for plaintiffs whose child was molested by baby-sitter); R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26, 33-34 (Wyo.1994) (noting exception to presence requirement where defendant sexually abused plaintiff's wife for several years and indirectly helped her commit suicide). {53 In the instant case, no such compelling cireumst | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richmond v. Bateman
green
2 sentences2024A court visitor is appointed in a guardianship proceeding “to conduct an inquiry into whether to waive the respondent’s presence at the hearing,” id. 2024R. 6-507(2), and may additionally be appointed “to investigate the respondent’s circumstances and well-being, including when an attorney is not appointed,” id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re A.G...
green
1 sentence2022We offer our view that having the relinquishing parent sign the relinquishment document either prior to the relinquishment hearing or in the court’s presence at the hearing—regardless of (continued…) 20210914-CA 12 2022 UT App 126 In re A.G. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hatch v. Davis
green
2 sentences2006Hatch v. Davis, 2004 UT App 378, ¶ 52 , 102 P.3d 774 . $27 What sort of cireumstances are sufficiently atrocious to give rise to the presence exception? 2006Hatch v. Davis, 2004 UT App 378, ¶ 52 , 102 P.3d 774 . $27 What sort of cireumstances are sufficiently atrocious to give rise to the presence exception? | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1991Id. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. at 1628 . 1991Id. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. at 1628 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Brewer v. Williams
green
2 sentences1985It is because of the importance of the presence of defense counsel in protecting the truth-seeking procedures of the criminal process that the standard for determining whether a suspect has waived counsel is strict and the “courts indulge in every reasonable presumption against waiver.” Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct. 1232, 1242 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977). 1985It is because of the importance of the presence of defense counsel in protecting the truth-seeking procedures of the criminal process that the standard for determining whether a suspect has waived counsel is strict and the “courts indulge in every reasonable presumption against waiver.” Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct. 1232, 1242 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.