Davis rule in Alaska

9 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (31)

Case	Followed	Cited
Allen v. Stategreen alaska · 1966 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1972–1976 2 sentences 1976In Allen v. State, 420 P.2d 465, 468 (Alaska 1965) (footnote omitted), we addressed “ . . . the Davis test so far as it requires an instruction to the jury that circumstantial evidence must be of such a nature as to be inconsistent with any other reasonable theory than that of guilt.” We went on to state (footnote omitted), “Such an instruction is unnecessary and may well 'be confusing and therefore should be dispensed with. 1976In Allen v. State, 420 P.2d 465, 468 (Alaska 1965) (footnote omitted), we addressed “ . . . the Davis test so far as it requires an instruction to the jury that circumstantial evidence must be of such a nature as to be inconsistent with any other reasonable theory than that of guilt.” We went on to state (footnote omitted), “Such an instruction is unnecessary and may well 'be confusing and therefore should be dispensed with.	1	2
Jordan v. Stategreen alaska · 1971 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1972–1976 2 sentences 1972For cases indicating our disapproval of the Davis test, see Tarnef v. State, 492 P.2d 109 (Alaska 1971); Jordan v. State, 481 P.2d 383 (Alaska 1971); Allen v. State, 420 P.2d 465 (Alaska 1965). [10] Since we regard this issue as controlling, we see no reason to discuss the other matters raised by Armstrong. 1972For cases indicating our disapproval of the Davis test, see Tarnef v. State, 492 P.2d 109 (Alaska 1971); Jordan v. State, 481 P.2d 383 (Alaska 1971); Allen v. State, 420 P.2d 465 (Alaska 1965). [10] Since we regard this issue as controlling, we see no reason to discuss the other matters raised by Armstrong.	1	2
Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPgreen alaska · 2013 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022He never argued, either in the superior court or on appeal, that their claim was untimely because they were on notice of the 2016 roof failure or its cause more than three years before filing suit in 2019.15 Therefore Griffith has waived any such argument,16 and we affirm the superior court’s ruling that Hemphill 13 (...continued) the plaintiffs could have first maintained the action to a successful conclusion”). 14 Although Griffith does not challenge the damages attributable to his failure to maintain insurance on the property, we observe that his repeated failures to pay for property insura	1	1
Clark v. State, Department of Correctionsgreen alaska · 2007 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017“A claim is moot . . . where a party bringing the action would not be entitled to any relief even if he or she prevailed.” Clark v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 156 P.3d 384, 387 (Alaska 2007) (citing Maynard v. State Farm Mut.	1	1
Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp.green alaska · 2009 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017CONCLUSION We AFFIRM the judgment of the superior court. 13 Cf. Helfrich v. Valdez Motel Corp., 207 P.3d 552, 560 (Alaska 2009) (holding, in case governed by the Uniform Residential Landlord Tenant Act, that statutory anti-retaliation remedy protects only tenant actions intended to vindicate legal rights protected by the landlord-tenant laws). 14 Davis’s challenge to the superior court’s denial of injunctive relief is moot, as he does not challenge the court’s decision granting possession of the property to King.	1	1
Gerald Anthony Coleman v. Harry K. Singletary, Robert A. Butterworthgreen ca11 · 1994 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Commonwealth v. Jonesgreen mass · 2003 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See, e.g., Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. 349 , 566 S.E.2d 668, 672 (2002); Taylor v. State, 689 N.E.2d 699, 703 (Ind.1997); Commonwealth v. Jones, 439 Mass. 249 , 786 N.E.2d 1197, 1206 (2003). 6 . 2005See, e.g., Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. 349 , 566 S.E.2d 668, 672 (2002); Taylor v. State, 689 N.E.2d 699, 703 (Ind.1997); Commonwealth v. Jones, 439 Mass. 249 , 786 N.E.2d 1197, 1206 (2003). 6 .	1	1
United States v. Dontay Banks, Mario Dunlap, Michael Wills, Alton Mills, Robert Gaines, Monica Boguille, and Robert Shippgreen ca7 · 1996 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Frederick C.green nebctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Taylor v. Stategreen ind · 1997 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005See, e.g., Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. 349 , 566 S.E.2d 668, 672 (2002); Taylor v. State, 689 N.E.2d 699, 703 (Ind.1997); Commonwealth v. Jones, 439 Mass. 249 , 786 N.E.2d 1197, 1206 (2003). 6 .	1	1
State v. Greybullgreen nd · 1998 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005	1	1
State v. Owengreen fla · 1997 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Alekseygreen sc · 2000 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Bacongreen vt · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Donesaygreen kan · 1998 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Kinggreen me · 1998 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Whipplegreen idahoctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Dowthitt v. Stategreen texcrimapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Evans v. Demosthenesgreen nvd · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Fitz v. Stategreen ga · 2002 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See, e.g., Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. 349 , 566 S.E.2d 668, 672 (2002); Taylor v. State, 689 N.E.2d 699, 703 (Ind.1997); Commonwealth v. Jones, 439 Mass. 249 , 786 N.E.2d 1197, 1206 (2003). 6 . 2005See, e.g., Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. 349 , 566 S.E.2d 668, 672 (2002); Taylor v. State, 689 N.E.2d 699, 703 (Ind.1997); Commonwealth v. Jones, 439 Mass. 249 , 786 N.E.2d 1197, 1206 (2003). 6 .	1	1
People v. Arroyagreen colo · 1999 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005	1	1
United States v. Scottie Ray Hurstgreen ca6 · 2000 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Bowen v. Stategreen ark · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
State v. Rossgreen wisctapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005	1	1
State v. Murphygreen ohio · 2001 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Midkiff v. Commonwealthgreen va · 1995 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	1
Uptegraft v. Stategreen alaska · 1980 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988	1	1
Green v. Stategreen alaska · 1964 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977	1	1
Beavers v. Stategreen alaska · 1971 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972	1	1
DeSacia v. Stategreen alaska · 1970 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972	1	1
Jennings v. Stategreen alaska · 1965 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
cluster 728150 green ca9 · 1996 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
People v. Cohen green ny · 1997 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
United States v. Perez green scotus · 1996	1	2005–2005
Waller v. Perry green scotus · 1996 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
Billy-Eko v. United States green scotus · 1996 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
State v. Williams green minn · 1995 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
United States v. Alton Mills green ca7 · 1997 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
People v. Cohen green nyappdiv · 1996 2 sentences 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v. 2005See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 759-60 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Banks, 78 F.3d 1190, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1996), vacated sub nom., Mills v. United States, 519 U.S. 990 , 117 S.Ct. 478 , 136 L.Ed.2d 373 (1996), on remand, 122 F.3d 346 (7th Cir.1997); Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F.3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994); Evans v. Demosthenes, 902 F.Supp. 1253, 1258-59 (D.Nev.1995) (predicting that Ninth Circuit would apply Davis to the right-to-silence context), aff 'd 98 F.3d 1174 , 1176 (9th Cir.1996) (leaving open the question of whether the Davis rule extends to right to silence); Bowen v.	1	2005–2005
Tarnef v. State green alaska · 1971	1	1972–1972

Where else courts name it

TX 81 (1972–2026) GA 60 (1976–2025) FL 58 (1971–2025) OH 57 (1996–2026) CA 50 (1965–2026) PA 39 (1971–2026) WA 38 (1978–2024) IN 34 (1978–2026) IL 30 (1975–2026) MS 25 (1992–2024) MD 25 (1979–2025) MO 24 (1959–2024) VA 19 (1990–2026) MI 18 (1977–2026) SC 17 (1990–2026) NY 16 (1944–2026) TN 16 (1962–2019) DC 14 (1976–2023) KS 14 (1992–2021) AL 14 (1965–2024) IA 13 (1979–2025) MN 13 (2006–2025) LA 12 (1978–2020) AZ 12 (1989–2021) AR 10 (1996–2025) NC 10 (1974–2025) NE 10 (1988–2024) NJ 10 (1967–2025) AK 9 (1966–2022) ME 9 (1997–2026) MT 9 (1978–2016) UT 8 (1987–2013) CO 8 (1967–2022) WY 8 (1997–2017) OK 7 (1978–2016) WI 7 (1985–2026) CT 7 (1970–2026) KY 6 (1993–2026) ID 6 (1998–2023) OR 6 (1977–2025) DE 5 (2014–2024) HI 4 (2007–2017) SD 4 (1981–2022) MA 4 (1999–2011) VT 4 (1988–2008) NV 3 (1990–2019) ND 3 (1989–2010) NM 3 (2009–2024) WV 2 (1978–1979) VI 2 (2010–2026) RI 2 (1987–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check