Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dickerson v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2025The jury acquitted him of the charge of preventing a lawful arrest. -5- time to do something about it.” Bethea, 297 Va. at 743 (quoting Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. App. 351, 356 (2011)). 2025The jury acquitted him of the charge of preventing a lawful arrest. -5- time to do something about it.” Bethea, 297 Va. at 743 (quoting Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 58 Va. App. 351, 356 (2011)). | 2 | 2 |
Franklin Minor v. Commonwealth of Virginiagreen2 sentences2023Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Davis’s motion to modify his sentence, “we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal regarding the denial of that motion.” Minor v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. App. 728, 743 (2016). 2023Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Davis’s motion to modify or reconsider his sentence, “we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal regarding the denial of that motion.” Minor, 66 Va. App. at 743 . | 1 | 2 |
Glenn v. Com.green1 sentence2026See, e.g., Glenn v. Commonwealth, 275 Va. 123, 130 (2008) (reviewing Fourth Amendment issues de novo); Secret v. Commonwealth, 296 Va. 204 , 225 (2018) (reviewing Fifth Amendment issues de novo). | 1 | 1 |
Super Fresh Food Markets of Virginia, Inc. v. Ruffingreen1 sentence2023Rule 1:1(a) provides that “[a]ll final judgments, orders, and decrees . . . remain under the control of the trial court and may be modified, vacated, or suspended for twenty-one days after the date of entry, and no longer.” This rule is “mandatory in order to assure the certainty and stability that the finality of judgments brings.” Dobson v. Commonwealth, ___ Va. App. ___, ___ (Feb. 7, 2023) (quoting Super Fresh Food Mkts. of Va., Inc. v. Ruffin, 263 Va. 555, 563 (2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Comed, Inc.green2 sentences2012Id. at 601-02 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 (citing Davis v. Comed, Inc., 619 F.2d 588, 593-94 (6th Cir.1980)). [3] We observed that these factors "are not exclusive and must be considered in the totality of the circumstances found in each case." Id. at 602 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 . 2012Id. at 601-02 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 (citing Davis v. Comed, Inc., 619 F.2d 588, 593-94 (6th Cir.1980)). [3] We observed that these factors "are not exclusive and must be considered in the totality of the circumstances found in each case." Id. at 602 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 . | 1 | 1 |
Washington v. Com.green2 sentences2010Therefore, Officer Herbst’s actions in handcuffing Davis and placing him in the police car did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and the trial court did not err in denying Davis’s motion to suppress. 4 Davis contends that Officer Herbst exceeded the scope of a Terry stop by entering his apartment. “[A] suspect may not defeat an arrest which has been set in motion in a public place . . . by the expedient of escaping to a private place.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 43 (1976); see Washington v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 5, 15 , 509 S.E.2d 512 (1999). 2010Therefore, Officer Herbst’s actions in handcuffing Davis and placing him in the police car did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and the trial court did not err in denying Davis’s motion to suppress. 4 Davis contends that Officer Herbst exceeded the scope of a Terry stop by entering his apartment. “[A] suspect may not defeat an arrest which has been set in motion in a public place . . . by the expedient of escaping to a private place.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 43 (1976); see Washington v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 5, 15 , 509 S.E.2d 512 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Key v. State, 289 Ga.App. 317 , 657 S.E.2d 273 (2008) (holding that a 911 call to report the erratic driving of the defendant was nontestimonial as its primary purpose was to "prevent harm to the public”); see also Cook v. State, 199 S.W.3d 495 (Tex.App.2006). 2010See Key v. State, 289 Ga.App. 317 , 657 S.E.2d 273 (2008) (holding that a 911 call to report the erratic driving of the defendant was nontestimonial as its primary purpose was to "prevent harm to the public”); see also Cook v. State, 199 S.W.3d 495 (Tex.App.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Key v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Key v. State, 289 Ga.App. 317 , 657 S.E.2d 273 (2008) (holding that a 911 call to report the erratic driving of the defendant was nontestimonial as its primary purpose was to "prevent harm to the public”); see also Cook v. State, 199 S.W.3d 495 (Tex.App.2006). 2010See Key v. State, 289 Ga.App. 317 , 657 S.E.2d 273 (2008) (holding that a 911 call to report the erratic driving of the defendant was nontestimonial as its primary purpose was to "prevent harm to the public”); see also Cook v. State, 199 S.W.3d 495 (Tex.App.2006). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Santanagreen1 sentence2010Therefore, Officer Herbst’s actions in handcuffing Davis and placing him in the police car did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and the trial court did not err in denying Davis’s motion to suppress. 4 Davis contends that Officer Herbst exceeded the scope of a Terry stop by entering his apartment. “[A] suspect may not defeat an arrest which has been set in motion in a public place . . . by the expedient of escaping to a private place.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 43 (1976); see Washington v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 5, 15 , 509 S.E.2d 512 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Withrow v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2002Davis's claim is a narrow one; she contends her "confession was an involuntary statement because it was obtained by a promise of leniency . . . [when Detective] Moore promised not to charge [her] with possession of cocaine if she confessed to all of the other break-ins and grand larcenies." In determining the validity of her claim, we examine the "totality of circumstances." Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680, 689 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Terrell v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2002Thus, we have held that when the conduct of the police is questioned, we "must consider the interrogation techniques employed, including evidence of trickery and deceit, psychological pressure, threats or promises of leniency, and duration and circumstances of the interrogation." Terrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 285, 291 , 403 S.E.2d 387, 390 (1991). - 4 - Standing alone, however, a promise of leniency generally is insufficient to support a finding that the accused's will was overborne. 2002Thus, we have held that when the conduct of the police is questioned, we "must consider the interrogation techniques employed, including evidence of trickery and deceit, psychological pressure, threats or promises of leniency, and duration and circumstances of the interrogation." Terrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 285, 291 , 403 S.E.2d 387, 390 (1991). - 4 - Standing alone, however, a promise of leniency generally is insufficient to support a finding that the accused's will was overborne. | 1 | 1 |
McDaniel v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2001In undertaking an Edwards/Davis analysis, a trial court must apply an objective test to determine if an accused "'articulate[d] his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly'" for a "'reasonable police officer'" to "'understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'" McDaniel v. Commonwealth, 30 Va. App. 602, 605 , 518 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1999) (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 459 ). "[W]hether an accused - 11 - requested counsel is . . . a factual determination that will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous." Mills v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 459, 468 , 418 S.E.2d 7 2001In undertaking an Edwards/Davis analysis, a trial court must apply an objective test to determine if an accused "'articulate[d] his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly'" for a "'reasonable police officer'" to "'understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'" McDaniel v. Commonwealth, 30 Va. App. 602, 605 , 518 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1999) (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 459 ). "[W]hether an accused - 11 - requested counsel is . . . a factual determination that will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous." Mills v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 459, 468 , 418 S.E.2d 7 | 1 | 1 |
Mills v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2001In undertaking an Edwards/Davis analysis, a trial court must apply an objective test to determine if an accused "'articulate[d] his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly'" for a "'reasonable police officer'" to "'understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'" McDaniel v. Commonwealth, 30 Va. App. 602, 605 , 518 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1999) (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 459 ). "[W]hether an accused - 11 - requested counsel is . . . a factual determination that will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous." Mills v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 459, 468 , 418 S.E.2d 7 2001In undertaking an Edwards/Davis analysis, a trial court must apply an objective test to determine if an accused "'articulate[d] his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly'" for a "'reasonable police officer'" to "'understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'" McDaniel v. Commonwealth, 30 Va. App. 602, 605 , 518 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1999) (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 459 ). "[W]hether an accused - 11 - requested counsel is . . . a factual determination that will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous." Mills v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 459, 468 , 418 S.E.2d 7 | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1997The identity of women who were later arrested for selling drags from that locale was material not because Davis alleged that *599 they were eyewitnesses, cf. Lowe v. Commonwealth, 218 Va. 670, 679 , 239 S.E.2d 112, 118 (1977), but because it tended to support Davis’ defense of misidentification. 1997The identity of women who were later arrested for selling drags from that locale was material not because Davis alleged that *599 they were eyewitnesses, cf. Lowe v. Commonwealth, 218 Va. 670, 679 , 239 S.E.2d 112, 118 (1977), but because it tended to support Davis’ defense of misidentification. | 1 | 1 |
Bowman v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1997See Bowman v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 130, 133-36 , 445 S.E.2d 110, 112-13 (1994). 1997See Bowman v. Commonwealth, 248 Va. 130, 133-36 , 445 S.E.2d 110, 112-13 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Kehl v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1995See Kehl v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 602, 605 , 426 S.E.2d 127, 130 (1993). 1995See Kehl v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 602, 605 , 426 S.E.2d 127, 130 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilder v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2022Canada contends that the 911 call in his case is analogous to the call in Wilder v. Commonwealth, 55 Va. App. 579 (2010). 2022Canada contends that the 911 call in his case is analogous to the call in Wilder v. Commonwealth, 55 Va. App. 579 (2010). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Jennings v. KAY JENNINGS FAMILY LTD.
green
2 sentences2012Id. at 601-02 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 (citing Davis v. Comed, Inc., 619 F.2d 588, 593-94 (6th Cir.1980)). [3] We observed that these factors "are not exclusive and must be considered in the totality of the circumstances found in each case." Id. at 602 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 . 2012Id. at 601-02 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 (citing Davis v. Comed, Inc., 619 F.2d 588, 593-94 (6th Cir.1980)). [3] We observed that these factors "are not exclusive and must be considered in the totality of the circumstances found in each case." Id. at 602 , 659 S.E.2d at 288 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Fink v. Golenbock
green
2 sentences2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i 2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Elgin v. Alfa Corp.
green
2 sentences2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i 2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy Limited
green
2 sentences2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i 2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Larson v. Dumke
green
2 sentences2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i 2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming
green
2 sentences2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i 2008These factors have been utilized in many jurisdictions, see Larson v. Dumke, 900 F.2d 1363 , 1367 (9th Cir.1990), Vanderbilt v. Geo-Energy, Ltd., 725 F.2d 204 , 207 (3d Cir.1983), Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 , 818-19 (Ala.1992), Fink v. Golenbock, 238 Conn. 183 , 680 A.2d 1243 , 1256 (1996), Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, 90 P.3d 724 , 735-36 (Wyo.2004), and the trial court's factual findings here indicate that it considered the Davis factors in reaching its holding. 4 We agree that these factors are relevant in determining whether a limited partner can adequately and fairly represent the i | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Brown v. Haley
green
2 sentences2003In Brown , we stated that “[t]he test to determine whether claims are part of a single cause of action is whether the same evidence is necessary to prove each claim.” 233 Va. at 216 , 355 S.E.2d at 567 . 2003In Brown , we stated that “[t]he test to determine whether claims are part of a single cause of action is whether the same evidence is necessary to prove each claim.” 233 Va. at 216 , 355 S.E.2d at 567 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McGee v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2002“Consent to search obtained as the result of an illegal detention is ‘not an independent source of the evidence, but rather [is] an exploitation of the unlawful [stop].’” McGee, 25 Va.App. at 204 , 487 S.E.2d at 264 (citing Ealy, 12 Va.App. at 757 , 407 S.E.2d at 689 ). 2002“Consent to search obtained as the result of an illegal detention is ‘not an independent source of the evidence, but rather [is] an exploitation of the unlawful [stop].’” McGee, 25 Va.App. at 204 , 487 S.E.2d at 264 (citing Ealy, 12 Va.App. at 757 , 407 S.E.2d at 689 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Commonwealth v. Ealy
green
2 sentences2002“Consent to search obtained as the result of an illegal detention is ‘not an independent source of the evidence, but rather [is] an exploitation of the unlawful [stop].’” McGee, 25 Va.App. at 204 , 487 S.E.2d at 264 (citing Ealy, 12 Va.App. at 757 , 407 S.E.2d at 689 ). 2002“Consent to search obtained as the result of an illegal detention is ‘not an independent source of the evidence, but rather [is] an exploitation of the unlawful [stop].’” McGee, 25 Va.App. at 204 , 487 S.E.2d at 264 (citing Ealy, 12 Va.App. at 757 , 407 S.E.2d at 689 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Davis v. United States
green
1 sentence2001In undertaking an Edwards/Davis analysis, a trial court must apply an objective test to determine if an accused "'articulate[d] his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly'" for a "'reasonable police officer'" to "'understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.'" McDaniel v. Commonwealth, 30 Va. App. 602, 605 , 518 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1999) (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 459 ). "[W]hether an accused - 11 - requested counsel is . . . a factual determination that will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous." Mills v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 459, 468 , 418 S.E.2d 7 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Illinois v. Wardlow
green
2 sentences2001In Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 , 120 S.Ct. 673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000), police officers were “converging on an area known for heavy narcotics trafficking in order to investigate drug transactions” when the officers “observed ... 2001In Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 , 120 S.Ct. 673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000), police officers were “converging on an area known for heavy narcotics trafficking in order to investigate drug transactions” when the officers “observed ... | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Davis v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1993The trial judge “assume[d] the General Assembly was aware of the process used tó convert the breath analysis to a blood alcohol concentration when they enacted the legislation permitting use of the breath test.” That statement evidences recognition that margin of error was an issue and “[ujnless rebutted .. ., [breathalyzer] test results are sufficient to establish the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving.” Davis, 8 Va. App. at 300 , 381 S.E.2d at 16 . 1993The trial judge “assume[d] the General Assembly was aware of the process used tó convert the breath analysis to a blood alcohol concentration when they enacted the legislation permitting use of the breath test.” That statement evidences recognition that margin of error was an issue and “[ujnless rebutted .. ., [breathalyzer] test results are sufficient to establish the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving.” Davis, 8 Va. App. at 300 , 381 S.E.2d at 16 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Davis v. Davis
green
2 sentences1990Davis v. Davis, 8 Va.App. 12 , 377 S.E.2d 640 (1989). [3] While it is true that Donna's $9,000 spousal-support award was not entered until a day after Davis had divested himself of title to the property, the statute affords its remedy to "persons" as well as to "creditors" and applies not only to what they are entitled to but also to what they "may be entitled to". 1990Davis v. Davis, 8 Va.App. 12 , 377 S.E.2d 640 (1989). [3] While it is true that Donna's $9,000 spousal-support award was not entered until a day after Davis had divested himself of title to the property, the statute affords its remedy to "persons" as well as to "creditors" and applies not only to what they are entitled to but also to what they "may be entitled to". | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.