8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc.green2 sentences2007The rationale underlying this rule being that "recovery of interest on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." 676 So.2d at 96-97 (citations omitted). 2004This Court, quoting Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 794 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1986), stated, "The rationale underlying this rule being that `recovery of interest' on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Milstead, 676 So.2d at 97 . [19] *949 In Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), 808 So.2d 852, 864 ; writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766 , writ recalled as improvidently granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), 833 So.2d 942 , an employee filed suit against his former employer for wrongful termination under the Family a | 2 | 3 |
City of Lake Charles v. Bellgreen1 sentence2014The rationale underlying this principle was explaihed in City of Lake Charles v. Bell, 347 So.2d at 496-97 (citations omitted), as follows: Inviolability of court orders is unique among governmental commands. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Celestinegreen1 sentence2004However, Louisiana law also holds that "an intermediary who arranges or facilitates the transfer of narcotics from the *510 seller to the buyer may ... be charged and punished as a principal in the act of distribution." Celestine , 95-1393 at 3, 671 So.2d at 897 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ira L. Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004This Court, quoting Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 794 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1986), stated, "The rationale underlying this rule being that `recovery of interest' on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Milstead, 676 So.2d at 97 . [19] *949 In Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), 808 So.2d 852, 864 ; writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766 , writ recalled as improvidently granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), 833 So.2d 942 , an employee filed suit against his former employer for wrongful termination under the Family a 1996The rationale underlying this rule being that "recovery of interest on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Martin, supra . | 2 | 1996–2004 |
Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co.
green
2 sentences1969Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: "All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. 1967Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 , cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: “All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. | 2 | 1967–1969 |
O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
neutral
2 sentences1969Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: "All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. 1967Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 , cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: “All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. | 2 | 1967–1969 |
American Surety Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1969Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: "All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. 1967Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 , cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: “All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. | 2 | 1967–1969 |
Mercury Press, Inc. v. District of CoLumbia
green
2 sentences1969Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: "All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. 1967Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 173 F.2d 844 , cert. denied, 337 U.S. 930 , 69 S.Ct. 1495 , 93 L.Ed. 1737 , which gives the rationale underlying this rule of law thusly: “All legislation making foreign corporations amenable to judicial process in the state in which they seek the privilege of doing business is predicated upon the right of the state to protect its citizens in their controversies with such corporations by requiring that the same be adjudicated in the courts of the state rather than compelling its citizens to travel to remote places to litigate such controversies. | 2 | 1967–1969 |
Williams v. Rubicon, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004This Court, quoting Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 794 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1986), stated, "The rationale underlying this rule being that `recovery of interest' on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Milstead, 676 So.2d at 97 . [19] *949 In Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), 808 So.2d 852, 864 ; writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766 , writ recalled as improvidently granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), 833 So.2d 942 , an employee filed suit against his former employer for wrongful termination under the Family a | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Williams v. Rubicon, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004This Court, quoting Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 794 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1986), stated, "The rationale underlying this rule being that `recovery of interest' on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Milstead, 676 So.2d at 97 . [19] *949 In Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), 808 So.2d 852, 864 ; writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766 , writ recalled as improvidently granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), 833 So.2d 942 , an employee filed suit against his former employer for wrongful termination under the Family a | 1 | 2004–2004 |
United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los Santos
green
1 sentence2004The rationale underlying this rule is that "[s]ince both acquire possession from the outset and neither intends to distribute the drug to a third person, neither serves as a link in the chain of distribution." Swiderski, 548 F.2d at 450 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Williams v. Rubicon, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004This Court, quoting Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 794 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.1986), stated, "The rationale underlying this rule being that `recovery of interest' on losses not yet incurred effectively grants the recipient double recovery." Milstead, 676 So.2d at 97 . [19] *949 In Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), 808 So.2d 852, 864 ; writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766 , writ recalled as improvidently granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), 833 So.2d 942 , an employee filed suit against his former employer for wrongful termination under the Family a | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.