Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 370277green2 sentences2005See, e.g. , Kartell , at 550; Shore , at 356; Brookshire , at 923. 2005See, e.g., Kartell, at 550; Shore , at 356; Brookshire , at 923. | 3 | 3 |
Brookshire Ex Rel. Brookshire v. Retzgreen2 sentences2005See, e.g. , Kartell , at 550; Shore , at 356; Brookshire , at 923. 2005See, e.g., Kartell, at 550; Shore , at 356; Brookshire , at 923. | 3 | 3 |
James P. Kartell, M.D., and Grant v. Rodkey, M.D., Intervenor-Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.green1 sentence2005See, e.g. , Kartell , at 550; Shore , at 356; Brookshire , at 923. | 1 | 1 |
Louis v. Louisgreen2 sentences2004"The rationale underlying the rule eliminating a duty where the dangers are *776 known or obvious is that `no one needs notice of what he knows or reasonably may be expected to know.'" Steenson, supra, at 146 (quoting Louis v. Louis, 636 N.W.2d 314, 321-22 (Minn.2001) (quotation omitted)). 2004“The rationale underlying the rule eliminating a duty where the dangers are known or obvious is that ‘no one needs notice of what he knows or reasonably may be expected to know.’ ” Steenson, supra, at 146 (quoting Louis v. Louis, 636 N.W.2d 314, 321-22 (Minn.2001) (quotation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Judd & Detweiler, Inc. v. Gittingsgreen1 sentence1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman
green
2 sentences1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). 1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Burt v. Gahan
green
2 sentences1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). 1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Monick v. Melnicoff
neutral
1 sentence1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Molezzo Reporters v. Patt
green
2 sentences1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). 1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg
green
2 sentences1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). 1985See Judd & Detweiler v. Gittings, 43 App.D.C. 304 (1915); Molezzo Reporters v. Patt, 94 Nev. 540 , 579 P.2d 1243 (1978); Burt v. Gahan, 351 Mass. 340 , 220 N.E.2d 817 (1966); Monick v. Melnicoff, 144 A.2d 381 (D.C.Mun.App.1958); Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman, 109 N.J.Super. 594 , 264 A.2d 237 (1970); Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242 Ga. 232 , 248 S.E.2d 631 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Mitchell v. Forsyth
green
2 sentences1985Legislators are accountable to their constituents, ..., and the judicial process is largely self-correcting: procedural rules, appeals, and the possibility of collateral challenges obviate the need for damage actions to prevent unjust results.” Mitchell v. Forsyth, — U.S. -, - - -, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). 1985Legislators are accountable to their constituents, ..., and the judicial process is largely self-correcting: procedural rules, appeals, and the possibility of collateral challenges obviate the need for damage actions to prevent unjust results.” Mitchell v. Forsyth, — U.S. -, - - -, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.