Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Simpson v. Tobingreen2 sentences1998Simpson v. Tobin, 367 N.W.2d 757, 768 (S.D.1985). [¶ 33.] Our review of the record persuades us that the Legislature would have intended the appropriation for salary increases for Regents’ employees to take effect even without the unconstitutional clause in' section 31 on collective bargaining. 1998Simpson v. Tobin, 367 N.W.2d 757, 768 (S.D. 1985). [¶ 33.] Our review of the record persuades us that the Legislature would have intended the appropriation for salary increases for Regents' employees to take effect even without the unconstitutional clause in section 31 on collective bargaining. | 1 | 1 |
Yakus v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1997In Yakus , the challenged statute mandated that the Administrator exercise his authority to fix prices in a manner which would “effectuate the purposes of [the] Act”, which had been set forth hy the legislature as follows: "to stabilize prices and to prevent speculative, unwarranted, and abnormal increases in prices and rents; to eliminate and prevent profiteering, hoarding, manipulation, speculation, and other disruptive practices resulting from abnormal market conditions or scarcities caused by or contributing to the national emergency; to assure that defense appropriations are not dissipate 1997In Yakus , the challenged statute mandated that the Administrator exercise his authority to fix prices in a manner which would “effectuate the purposes of [the] Act”, which had been set forth hy the legislature as follows: "to stabilize prices and to prevent speculative, unwarranted, and abnormal increases in prices and rents; to eliminate and prevent profiteering, hoarding, manipulation, speculation, and other disruptive practices resulting from abnormal market conditions or scarcities caused by or contributing to the national emergency; to assure that defense appropriations are not dissipate | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gould v. Pennington County Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences2001VIII § 15 of the South Dakota Constitution in the case of Gould v. Pennington Cty Bd of Equal, 1997 SD 129 , 570 NW2d 846 . 2001VIII § 15 of the South Dakota Constitution in the case of Gould v. Pennington Cty Bd of Equal, 1997 SD 129 , 570 NW2d 846 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Gillis
green
2 sentences1997“The presumption that [the Board] will not act arbitrarily but will exercise sound judgment and good faith cannot sustain a delegation of unregulated discretion.” Affiliated Distillers, 130 N.W.2d at 600 . [¶ 37.] I agree with the majority’s holding on Issue 2 that SDCL 36-20A-15 is not an unconstitutional violation of Boever’s due process rights. . 1997"The presumption that [the Board] will not act arbitrarily but will exercise sound judgment and good faith cannot sustain a delegation of unregulated discretion." Affiliated Distillers , 130 NW2d at 600 . [¶37] I agree with the majority's holding on Issue 2 that SDCL 36-20A-15 is not an unconstitutional violation of Boever's due process rights. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Clark v. Jeter
green
2 sentences1993Clark, 486 U.S. 456 , 108 S.Ct. 1910 , 100 L.Ed.2d 465 . 1993Clark, 486 U.S. 456 , 108 S.Ct. 1910 , 100 L.Ed.2d 465 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
City of Mitchell v. Western Public Service Co.
neutral
2 sentences1966City of Mitchell v. Western Public Service Co., 124 Neb. 248 , 246 N.W. 484 . 2. & 5. 1966City of Mitchell v. Western Public Service Co., 124 Neb. 248 , 246 N.W. 484 . 2. & 5. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.