7 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1988–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Graves v. Garraghtygreen1 sentence2023Here, the trial court concluded that appellant’s proffered evidence of prior consensual sexual encounters with V.N. was of acts that were not “reasonably proximate to the offense date.” This Court has previously held that “[t]he determination whether ‘prior sexual conduct’ is ‘reasonably proximate to the offense charged’ is a function not only of time, but also of ‘the circumstances of [the] case,’ including the situation and factors surrounding the prior conduct, the relationship between the parties, and the circumstances of the alleged offense.” League, 9 -7- Va. App. at 207 (second alterati | 1 | 1 |
Scientific Enterprises, Inc. v. Georgegreen1 sentence2011See Scientific Enters., Inc. v. George, 47 Va. Cir. 9, 14 (Fairfax County 1998). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Charles S. Hammettgreen1 sentence2009See, e.g., United States v. Hammett, 236 F.3d 1054, 1060 (9th Cir.2001) (“[A police] officer may, in good faith, move away from the front door when seeking to contact the occupants of a residence.”); United States v. Raines, 243 F.3d 419, 421 (8th Cir.2001) (recognizing “that law enforcement officers must sometimes move away from the front door when attempting to contact the occupants of a residence”); State v. Fisher, 283 Kan. 272 , 154 P.3d 455, 474 (2007) (‘We also acknowledge that if no one *651 answers the knock, as here, the officers can be justified in knocking on more doors.”). | 1 | 1 |
United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Thomas Jeffrey Raines, Appellant/cross-Appelleegreen1 sentence2009See, e.g., United States v. Hammett, 236 F.3d 1054, 1060 (9th Cir.2001) (“[A police] officer may, in good faith, move away from the front door when seeking to contact the occupants of a residence.”); United States v. Raines, 243 F.3d 419, 421 (8th Cir.2001) (recognizing “that law enforcement officers must sometimes move away from the front door when attempting to contact the occupants of a residence”); State v. Fisher, 283 Kan. 272 , 154 P.3d 455, 474 (2007) (‘We also acknowledge that if no one *651 answers the knock, as here, the officers can be justified in knocking on more doors.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fishergreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., United States v. Hammett, 236 F.3d 1054, 1060 (9th Cir.2001) (“[A police] officer may, in good faith, move away from the front door when seeking to contact the occupants of a residence.”); United States v. Raines, 243 F.3d 419, 421 (8th Cir.2001) (recognizing “that law enforcement officers must sometimes move away from the front door when attempting to contact the occupants of a residence”); State v. Fisher, 283 Kan. 272 , 154 P.3d 455, 474 (2007) (‘We also acknowledge that if no one *651 answers the knock, as here, the officers can be justified in knocking on more doors.”). 2009See, e.g., United States v. Hammett, 236 F.3d 1054, 1060 (9th Cir.2001) (“[A police] officer may, in good faith, move away from the front door when seeking to contact the occupants of a residence.”); United States v. Raines, 243 F.3d 419, 421 (8th Cir.2001) (recognizing “that law enforcement officers must sometimes move away from the front door when attempting to contact the occupants of a residence”); State v. Fisher, 283 Kan. 272 , 154 P.3d 455, 474 (2007) (‘We also acknowledge that if no one *651 answers the knock, as here, the officers can be justified in knocking on more doors.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 381379
green
1 sentence2022Id. at 856 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Thompson v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1999Indeed, the Court in Thompson specifically explained that it "expressied1 no opinion as to whether the search at issue ... might [have] been] justified as consensual." Id. at 23 , 105 S.Ct. 409 . 1999Indeed, the Court in Thompson specifically explained that it "expressied1 no opinion as to whether the search at issue ... might [have] been] justified as consensual." Id. at 23 , 105 S.Ct. 409 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Sutphin v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1990Id. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
McCotter v. Carle
green
1 sentence1988Id. at 674 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.